Spencer’s main thesis is how an individual’s race, gender, religion, social class, and/or ethnicity have an effect on such person’s privileges and whether they will be oppressed from equal opportunity. Spencer explains that if one does not fit into societal norms, such as being white American and Christian, for example, then the result will be that such people will be oppressed from equal opportunity. Spencer explains that people who are of different race, gender, religion and/or social class, people will often experience discrimination, as a result of racism. For example, power and privilege are often held by white American’s in the United States and if someone does not fit that class, often times, people are treated differently than what …show more content…
Like Spencer illustrated, as a woman, I am disadvantaged at walking through an alley at night- it is never safe for a woman. Spencer’s article made me aware of certain privileges I have because of the color of my skin. However, I felt such privileges taken away once I spoke in my mother’s native tongue or when I am seen walking to shul (synagogue). Due to past oppression, dating back generations in my family because we are Hispanic and Jewish, privilege is often taken for granted because oppression has had no effect in other people’s lives. Therefore, with the power of education, I can be the voice for the oppressed and disadvantage. The key is not to allow my education to get in the way of resentment, but to cultivate change when speaking to people in position of power. Spencer made me aware that I do not put much thought into my gender identity, as I conform to society’s “accepted” form of identity. I do however, respect and accept others who identity different than me. I do experience the privilege of having a full cognitive capacity, without the need to ask for accommodations. I rarely think about going to be placed where accessible entrance is necessary for the disabled or having to be worry having the police called on me because of the color of my …show more content…
To be an ally, as Spencer explains, is to be the voice of societal change so the dominant ideology can be rejected. To be an ally also means to defend groups who are disadvantaged. We live in a dominant society that is ruled by a common ideology on certain beliefs that impedes all other secondary beliefs. I am aware that as a result of the dominant society we live in, it will hinder the ability for the marginalized groups equal opportunity. As future social workers, we should provide anti-oppressed services to all people. We should also be conscious of the privileges we may have than other who do not as a way to ensure we do not participate in the oppression of people. Spencer raised awareness into the impact of privileges we may have that others do not. We are encouraged to transform the affects of oppression onto others into challenging our dominant society. I am aware that oppression has always been a problem in our society, however with Spencer’s points of view, he has encouraged me to focus on how privilege has been constructed and so on, maintained. In future practice I must give attention to how the dominate culture has depended on the oppressed as a way to generate the dominant own privileges to thus challenge the
(page 1, par. 3). As he continues to write, he uses the word “privilege” liberally throughout his essay. In this essay, I will be analyzing how the author uses the word “privilege” in his essay to gain credibility and an emotional response from his readers.
I sometimes get irritated when people don’t agree on the same ideas that I have or when the other person says something that I don’t agree with. The objective of this chapter made me comprehend that based on an individual’s experiences and viewpoints impacts the person’s behavior. Some experience may deal with the oppressions and privileges a person has, the article “Explaining White Privilege to a Broke White Person…” made me realize that I am more privilege than what I thought. The author didn’t think she was privilege until she read a book she got recommended and from her article she summarizes
Whites are privileged because we are seen as the average American. We do not get second glances, because nobody suspects we are doing anything but living our lives. Though since we are not subject to this intense scrutiny we do not realize that we in turn do this to African Americans, just simply living their daily lives as well. McIntosh (1988) points out that she repeatedly forgot each of the realizations on this list until I wrote it down. For me white privilege has turned out to be an elusive and fugitive subject.
Over the past decade the term white privilege has emerged in our American history. White privilege is the concept that one particular group is benefited which is typically identified as white people. Most of the victims experiencing harsh conditions are non-white people under the same social, political, or economic circumstances of mistreatment. A conversation took place with a few people about white privilege whose race is identified as white. An interviewer started that “the belief that being white comes with unearned advantages and everyday perks”.
And I can see from the outside in, driven by the old voices of childhood and lost in anger and fear.” This quote explains how a child could be effected with racist comments. Although it happened when she was a child, the racist comments came back to her because that’s what she believes she was. This ties in with Americans having equal opportunities because it shows how one could be affected by racism. If the American government was to restrict every race
Reading and Reimagining Social Life In Allan Johnson’s Privilege, Power, and Difference, Patricia Hill Collins describes the Matrix of Domination as an intersectionality between all the isms, especially racism and sexism. Collins describes this cycle of domination saying “that each form of privilege is part of a much larger system of privilege” (Johnson, 52). Work for change needs to focus on the idea of privilege in all forms and the way in which it enables people to think in relation to inequality and power. The only way to understand the matrix, is by understanding its dimensions.
doesn’t act now against the discrimination, future generations will have no hope or optimism to end it. This helps Chisholm by giving the audience a glimpse of what the future would be like if the prejudice doesn’t stop. Chisholm then says, “Of course laws will not eliminate prejudice in the hearts of human beings.” Chisholm assures the audience that laws alone won’t solve the problem. She continues, “but that is no reason to allow prejudice to continue to be enshrined in our laws -- to perpetuate injustice through inaction.”
However, Making Systems of Privilege Visible is not the only collaborative writing done by Wildman and Davis. They published a novel titled Privilege Revealed: How Invisible Preference Undermines America in 1996, which won the Gustavus Myers Center for Human Right’s Outstanding Book Award in 1997. It focuses on how many Americans who advocate for a merit-based, race-free society do not acknowledge the invisible systems of privilege that are benefiting them more and more everyday, just like the advocating theme of their other
Whether by ignorance or by will, inequality is viewed differently based on personal experiences.” He points out that when we discuss race, depending on who you are having the conversation, you are not talking about the same topic or issues(Lebron). The writer also states that we believe our democracy to be a superior form of government mainly because we have evolved to respecting the rights of one another, for the most part. The argument to that theory is systemic racism and how it continues to affect wealth, jobs, education and public services for minorities(Lebron). Other people would argue that minorities cause their own problems and hinder their own progress.
In chapter one, "Privilege, Oppression, and Difference, Allan Johnson begins his argument that "difference is not the problem"( Johnson, pg 5 ). The author goes on to explain that difference by itself is not the problem, rather difference in conjunction with our ideas that cause fear. That being said, discrimination was a bigger problem in the past and it still is today. We starts with talking about Rodney King and racism he had received from police officers in Los Angeles. Johnson continues on with the idea that people are judged not for who they are or the things they have accomplished, but how they are perceived by others.
People see whiteness because they experience its effects. A useful comparison can be drawn between the unrecognised privileges of males, and those of white people (McIntosh, 1988). It is not unusual for men to acknowledge that women are disadvantaged. With that said, McIntosh (1988) argues that white privilege is in the same manner without recognition and thus preserved. McIntosh (1988) views white privilege as an invisible collection of unearned assets that is of benefit to white people on a daily basis.
What does it mean to be “normal” What happens to those who fall outside of the normative standards? Barbara Perry borrows elements of Audrey Lorde’s conception of “the mythical norm” to receive a thorough understanding on why individuals who fall outside of the norm often feel oppressed. The mythical norm can be viewed as an ideology. It is a characteristic of society that maintains power, and creates oppression for others. Due to the power that the mythical norm contains, it also delivers a series of privileges that many whites may not realize that they have.
Without applying intersectionality in analysis, oppression can only be understood in general terms, which can cause forms of oppression to become undetected (Mattsson, 2014). Instead, intersectionality, demonstrates the complexity of gender, sexuality, class, and race avoiding stereotypes as a whole, rather than simplifying an individual based on one characteristic (Mattsson, 2014). For example, when I was working at a Community Centre in the Jane and Finch area, I had a conversation with my co-worker. He described the barriers and struggles he has faced because of his race and socioeconomic status. It was through this conversation that I realized the pre-conceived notions my co-worker had about me, as a white individual who did not grow-up in the same neighbourhood.
Kareen Harboyan English 1C Professor Supekar March 15, 2018 Word Count: Crenshaw’s Mapping the Margins: The Marginalization of Women of Color Analyzed Through Generalization and A Feminist Lens Crenshaw's Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color expands on the multifaceted struggles of women of color and the generalizations ingrained in society that limit women of color and keep them in a box. In this text, Crenshaw builds on the concept of intersectionality which proposes that social categorizations such as gender and race are intertwined and have great influence on one another.
They support this claim by using the matrix of domination in relation to gender, race and class, then advise the reader to look at an issue through a broad perspective- realizing both the oppressor and the oppressed, and finally distinguish between recognizing and understanding diversity and not just acknowledging it. Andersen and Collins’ purpose is to have students think about race, class and gender as systems of power, how the three categories matter in shaping everyone lived experiences, and to understand race, class, and gender are linked experiences. Furthermore, Anderson and Collins adopt an unbiased, and assertive yet friendly tone for his/her audience, the readers and others interested in the topic of race, class and gender. By doing this, the readers can relate to the struggles that the issues bring up, however the authors can still get their point or message across