The new constitution, a document granting the framework for a new democratic government, replacing the Articles of the Confederation. This new document gained approval from some of the citizens, but also raised questions and concerns from others. There was a constant back and forth between the two groups on whether or not the constitution should be ratified. This editorial provides historical background on the issue and expresses my opinion on which side I would’ve chosen. The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change. Soon after the …show more content…
They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document. Eventually, they came to a compromise and added a bill of right, later on, the Constitution was
The articles of confederation is the first national government of the United states America, however, this constitution is flawed. The new independent nation needed an organization that would hold all of the states together, send a military off in the future if needed and of course a stronger economy. The articles seemed to be the best route to take for the United States in order to build unity in their nation. The U.S wanted to avoid higher power like Great Britain with King George the third. They wanted to spread power to the people evenly.
The Articles of Confederation was the first standard government created in the United States, yet unsuccessful. The Articles failure made it clear that a new government was needed to secure the nation. The
Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..
The Article of Confederation was a document that gave a national government to the United states, after the US declared independence from Great Britain. However, this was the first written constitution for the united states, and this was necessary to have a national government. In addition, after the March 1, 1787 the Continental Congress implement the new government into the thirteen states and the economy. Furthermore, the constitution was a form of government that protect the people rights, as a citizen of the United States.
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of United States in November 1777. There were many weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. There was no national executive i.e. president, and no national judiciary. This confederation did not give national government any power of direct taxation. Before making any changes to the Article, 9 out of 13 states had to approve the law before it was passed.
When the states were first independent, they needed a government to run the country, thus creating the Articles of Confederation. Under The Articles of Confederation, the government was feeble and the country was failing. America was in major debt due to The Revolutionary War, states weren’t paying their federal duties, and Congress was unable to tax the states, which led to the government having no money. The image depicted was Shays Rebellion. Shays Rebellion was an army of Massachusetts farmers, led by Daniel Shays, who had created a rebellion against government, angered by taxes forced upon them.
The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views about the U.S. Constitution and how the government should have been organized. While the Federalists sought after a stronger national government and wanted to ratify the Constitution “as is”; the Anti-Federalists favored a stronger state government and a weaker national government. When the U.S. Constitution was presented to the Anti-Federalists, they were not necessarily against the U.S. Constitution, however, they wanted to incorporate a couple of additions to ensure that the national government would not gain too much power over the people. Due to the discourse between the two, they came up with a compromise and added the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. The Bill of Rights was
The Revolutionary War ended and now the Articles of Confederation are showing how weak they really are. On May 25th - September 25th 1787, delegates led by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton came together to fix the Articles of Confederation, but ended up creating a whole new document. That Document was the Constitution. After that, the whole country was debating whether the Constitution should be ratified. Based on the sources, the Constitution should have been ratified because the country was in economic distress, the nation was vulnerable, and the authors wanted the best for the country.
Still the anti-federalist felt that the government had too much power and The Bill of Rights address the concerns of the anti-federalist. Which was to protect individual freedoms from the threat of potential tyrannous federal government. The compromise help establishes the Constitution and it has pretty much unchanged and still used
The Articles of Confederation was full of weaknesses from the start. It provided no federal courts and no power to enforce its resolutions and ordinances. It had no power to levy taxes and had to rely on the states to provide the budget, which was often ignored. The government wasn 't able to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. Essentially, under the Articles, the government was not a uniform entity supported by the states, but a jumbled nation of states governing themselves under a common name.
Ratifying the Constitution Ratifying the Constitution has saved our country from being like England and from not falling apart. Before the constitution we had the articles and those weren’t working out at the time and we weren’t able to fight against rebellions and or against other countries when. We could act faster with the Constitution and we had a checks and balance system and also we had a checks and balances system. We could have acted faster with the constitution instead of wanting around for all states to agree on doing something.
All throughout history the largest and most successful nations, empires, and dynasties have thrived due to one main point: their foundation. Just as the Romans had their own constitution as a basis for the moral code of laws and infrastructure based on one document, the United States has their very own constitution. Consisting of a total of 27 amendments, 10 original and 17 later added, America has relied on this document and its various functions as a basis for running and maintaining the country for years on end. The constitution acts in the way of a parent or parents to a young child. The child appreciates and sees what his or her guardians does for them, but does not truly realize how each aspect of their daily lives is heavily influenced
Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.
The U.S. endorse the U.S. constitution in 1789, much of the time has been utilized as a model by rising countries. A constitution is the basic law of a state or nation that outlines the primary structure and functions of government. State constitutions, nonetheless, sometimes appreciate such esteem. Most definitely, the constitution of the state of Texas is more frequently disparaged than applauded in view of its length, indefinite quality, and its obsolete, unworkable arrangements. The political conditions that encompassed the written work of the national constitution varied impressively from those that existed at the times when large portions of the fifty states were composing their constitutions.
Right now a debate is occurring about whether not we should ratify the Constitution. This is an important moment in our country's history because this is the moment where we could unify and become a government or we could disapprove of the Constitution and have troubles between the country. The Articles of Confederation were not very credible because it gave the states too much power; which were too weak. The debts were not getting payed and the country was in great trouble. The Constitution would let the power will lie with the wealthy men, and not give the power to the states to raise money to pay off debt; the country will still remain in debt if we ratify the Constitution.