Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
The Federalist agreed with the Constitution and its provisions. The wanted to create a strong federal government that will combine both the federal and the states as one nation. One of the weakness that the Articles of Confederation address is that the state had rights to levy taxes and regulate commerce. The states where in charge of the money coming in. The government concern was that if the states did not provide funds for the military they could not do anything about it. Plus, they were in debt, to begin with, because of the war and would make it difficult to find creditors that would help handle the nation’s fiscal affairs. They were also unable to transport goods between states because there was no central authority to manage it. Each state had its own currency, levels of inflation and own taxes …show more content…
The Constitution gave powers to Congress to collect taxes and raise revenue, regulate commerce, both foreign and domestic, declare war, maintain an army, and make changes “necessary and proper” to pursue the powers, and it added, “all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States.” They also added The Executive Branch that consists of a president and his cabinet. The president was to be elected through the Electoral College. The president would have the power to create treaties, but only if two-thirds of the Senate approved them, oversee the army and navy as commander-in-chief, name diplomats with the consent of the Senate, execute the laws passed by Congress and veto acts of Congress that he did not feel were constitutional. The great Compromise also helps to grant each state equal representation. Still the anti-federalist felt that the government had too much power and The Bill of Rights address the concerns of the anti-federalist. Which was to protect individual freedoms from the threat of potential tyrannous federal government. The compromise help establishes the Constitution and it has pretty much unchanged and still used
Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution
1511 Words | 7 PagesThe federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
234 Words | 1 PagesThe Articles of Confederation gave states more power which lead to a weak central government. The Articles of Confederation has some weaknesses because it because the central government lacked the power to impose taxes. Additionally, the Articles of Confederation made it hard to enforce the laws which caused the need for a Constitution Convention to be held since there was extensive debt and no control over the people to keep them in line with the laws. Federalists wanted a strong Central government by having the constitution ratified as well as a system of checks and balances. Anti-Federalists wanted the bill of rights passed to guarantee safety of right for citizens.
Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesThe Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.
Bill Of Rights: Ratification Of The Constitution In 1787
157 Words | 1 PagesAfter the Declaration of Independence in 1787, the Federal Government turned to the creation of the Constitution in which delegates from 13 states convened to make compromises on their beliefs for the betterment of a nation. Although the Bill of Rights was initially not a part of the Constitution, the Federalists thought that it was crucial to ensure ratification of the Constitution. This ratification was one of the main reasons why the Bill of Rights needed to be added. Federalists feared a strong, central government, and created a Bill of Rights in order to prevent government abuse. Others believed that a dominating Government could prohibit rights in the future, which would not necessarily be expressed in the Bill of Rights.
Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay
827 Words | 4 PagesHence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.
Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq
516 Words | 3 PagesThe structure and powers of the federal government changed under the Constitution as compared to the Articles of Confederation. Many people, known as the anti-Federalists, opposed these changes while on the contrary, many people, known as the Federalists, supported them. The framework and function of the federal government changed drastically under the Constitution. The federal government was much stronger under the Constitution because it was given the power to run the states under more unified control.
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
263 Words | 2 PagesAs it applies to the Articles of Confederation there were many weaknesses in the way it went about governing the United States. For one, the loose federation of the states was too weak to act as a foundation to be considered or act as a central government. In addition the state legislatures had too much power and in turn had the ability to influence economic issues of all kinds. This strong legislature is the same one that allowed for mob ruling and actions by debtors. The Articles of confederation were also weak because the required congress to have all 13 colonies in agreement when a new tax was to be passed.
Differences Between The Federalists And Anti-Federalists
203 Words | 1 PagesWhen it came to the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists the differences are many and at times very complex, due to the beliefs that the Federalists are nationalist at heart. The Federalists had an incredibly big role in shaping the new Constitution, which the Federalists used to create a stronger Constitution at great cost to the Anti-Federalists. If you ask the Anti-Federalists They believe that should be a ratification of the US Constitution in every state. But due to the Anti-Federalists being poor at organizing they really didn’t gain any ground. Although they didn’t achieve their goals of ratification of the US Constitution, but they did force the first congress under a new Constitution along with the bill of rights.
Articles Of Confederation Thematic Essay
379 Words | 2 PagesThe Articles of Confederation was written when the United States was a fairly new country, and from the people wanting to create a different government from the king of England. Although this document respected individual rights, it was too loose of a document that could drive the country to success. After revising what they had created, the founding father of the us the created the us constitution. It was more strict, but still valued peoples rights.
Articles Of Confederation Federalism
203 Words | 1 PagesThe Federalist papers were made for two specifics reason of events that happened before the revolution that the leaders wanted to prevent in the future by coming up with the idea of editing the Articles of Confederation. this two reason were: American federal organization were practicing of the old British empire as it existed before 1764, and the arguments of the generation from the French and Indian war to the adoption of the federal Constitution, and, more particularly, the discussions in the ten or twelve years before independence, made the way they want to organize the country difficult because the population was used to it they were afraid of a change meant. “The center of this problem was the difficulty of recognizing federalism; and,
Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay
585 Words | 3 PagesThe Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.
Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists
622 Words | 3 PagesFederalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.
Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis
882 Words | 4 PagesFederalism helped the Constitution guard against tyranny by specifying which powers belong to the Federal government and which ones belong to the State government. This separation leads to a double security so that the state government can watch the federal government and the federal can watch the state. James Madison states in his Federalist Papers #51(Document A), “power surrendered by the people is first divided between two
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
724 Words | 3 PagesThe Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.
Articles Of Confederation Problems
784 Words | 4 PagesThe United States confronted many problems once they gained their independence from Great Britain. One of the biggest problems was their form of government at that time, which was stated in the Articles of Confederation. This presented many problem to the states, as stated in a document about the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, some of the problems of the Articles of Confederation were the poor international trade, poor foreign relations, weak economy, and Shay’s Rebellion. The people, specifically the Federalists, wanted a new government because of the weakness of the government at that moment. According to many history books, the government also faced financial problems and tried to resolve them by taxing the states, because
More about Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution
1511 Words | 7 PagesStrengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
234 Words | 1 PagesExplain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesBill Of Rights: Ratification Of The Constitution In 1787
157 Words | 1 PagesRatification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay
827 Words | 4 PagesArticles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq
516 Words | 3 PagesStrengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
263 Words | 2 PagesDifferences Between The Federalists And Anti-Federalists
203 Words | 1 PagesArticles Of Confederation Thematic Essay
379 Words | 2 PagesArticles Of Confederation Federalism
203 Words | 1 PagesArticles Of Confederation Dbq Essay
585 Words | 3 PagesDifferences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists
622 Words | 3 PagesConstitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis
882 Words | 4 PagesStrengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
724 Words | 3 PagesArticles Of Confederation Problems
784 Words | 4 Pages