When all the Montagues were dead he would start killing randomly until being caught and killed. The quote “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford. No better team than this: thou art a villain.” , says Tybalt. Now what Tybalt is telling us is that Romeo has killed before but has only been sentenced to be a villain and not to death. So not only has he killed before he has bribed the judge of his real sentence.
Doing the unthinkable crime of murder is one thing, but not being hurt by the death of your own husband, is baleful enough. Moreover, Mary hid the truth from, all with the help
Tybalt's challenges but Romeo rejects the challenge, saying, “I do protest I never injured thee,”(3.1.64).Essentially in this scene, Tybalt challenges Romeo, but he rejects the challenge. This causes Mercutio to step up and fight Tybalt. Mercutio gets killed, and Romeo avenges him by killing Tybalt. This is situational irony because Romeo didn’t want to fight, and was calm during the whole situation. This is ironic because by doing this Tybalt ends up killing Mercutio.
Titus, in this scene, has started to lose his civility when he stabbed his own flesh and blood. Titus’ civility is diminishing because he showed no reason or thought into his careless action of killing his son, it was a senseless act. This act of murder was not civil because he murdered his own kin which is also seen as a barbaric act because barbarism is killing with no reasoning. Titus explicitly defines barbarism by not assessing the matter before stabbing his son for no other reason than for being in his way. Titus’ slow crawl into the realm of barbarism is shown in this scene as he is showing no logic in his actions and no forgiveness to his sons for betraying Rome.
George has very different morals based on protecting Lennie, his travel companion and friend. His ultimate goal of helping Lennie leads to him ending Lennie’s life in order to prevent his suffering at the hands of Curley. The concept that morality takes precedence over the law in certain cases is manifested through the decision of Curley to hunt Lennie down and the decision of George to end Lennie’s life in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. Curley’s decision to hunt Lennie down for the murder of his wife is one circumstance in which a character’s morals are deemed more important than the laws that govern society.
Question One - Not killing (Pros and Cons) He believes that murder is wrong because he identifies as a “revolutionary” and in his opinion, this is quite different from being a murderer. “I am a revolutionary, not a murder” The barber realizes that murdering Captain Torres will create more problems than it would solve.
Essentially in this scene, Tybalt 's challenges but Romeo rejects the challenge this causes Mercutio to set up and fight Tybalt. Mercutio gets killed and Romeo avenges him by killing Tybalt. This is situational Irony because Romeo didn’t want to fight and was calm during the whole situation. This is ironic because by doing this Tybalt ends up killing Mercutio. He takes revenge for Mercutio and kills Tybalt.
Even though Darnay did nothing wrong and was not like his ancestors, Madame Defarge throws him in jail and successfully condemns him to die the next day. Charles Darnay tried to live a life apart from his ancestors, but he ends up having to pay for the wrongs that they have done. Madame Defarge is abusing her power to oppress
This is proof Tom Robinson is a symbol of a Mockingbird. he was killed for no reason so he was innocent and killed without a reason. Just like there is no reason to kill a Mockingbird, there is no reason to kill an innocent person. When Tom Robinson went to court for his rape case, he had lost the case before the jury even had time to come up with the verdict. I can prove this by saying"Scout realizes that although it may appear that Tom is given a fair trial, “in the secret court of men’s hearts Atticus had no case.
I think this isn’t because, the ghost of the king said, “Till the foul crimes done in my days of nature” is meaning he did some bad stuff when he was alive that he is not proud of (DOC.A). Also in the Treatment of Gertrude, hamlet accidently killed Polonius thinking it was the king spying on them in front of Gertrude, before Polonius dies he says “O, I am slain!”. Right after that Hamlet told his mother, Gertrude, that the new king killed his father, she didn’t believe and told him to be quiet that she couldn’t handle it. After that happened Hamlet sees the ghost of the king again, saying that “To speak to her, hamlet” (doc.
Either way, they would’ve died, and he would’ve deserved his death. General MacArthur: He “deliberately sent his wife’s lover, Arthur Richmond, to his death.” Here is another case where the person didn’t kill someone themselves, but caused their death intentionally. He sent Richmond because he knew that anyone who went would be killed, and therefore technically commit murder. If he believes Richmond should have died for doing something to him, then he deserves his death because he did something to someone else as well.
Prosecuting Romeo I, Jackson L. Weiss as Prosecutor of Summit County, Ohio, do charge Romeo Montague with voluntary manslaughter for the death of Tybalt Capulet and involuntary manslaughter for the death of Count Paris. The death of Tybalt Capulet was quite the tragedy as he was such a young man and had so much to live for. Romeo Montague will step up and take responsibility for the actions he has caused. He will be charged with voluntary manslaughter.
Have you ever wanted to or even attempted to kill someone who was not supposed to be invited to your party but somehow found out about it. No, did not think so. If you have read the play of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare then you may think of Tybalt think of killing people for coming to parties. Tybalt, in Romeo and Juliet had been mad because someone came to the party hosted by the Capulets who should not have. He then proceeded to try to kill them.
Comparison and Effect of Mercutio’s Death Scene There is only one way that a scene is written, but multiple ways, that scenes are portrayed. In the aftermath of 9/11, multiple screenwriters wrote films that depicted their own thoughts on the tragedy and how it should be perceived by the public. Oliver Stone’s World Trade Center focuses on the struggle of two police officers stuck under piles of mountainous rubble and the chaos that surrounded New York City at its height. Paul Greengrass's United 93 another 9/11 movie, focuses on flight United 93 which was hijacked, and the havoc that was created trying to save the lives of its target; Capitol Hill. The two films illustrated a horrific tragedy but was displayed in different interpretations
Who’s Responsible? In the book Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Tybalt is like the parasite in this story. It is evident that Tybalt is primarily responsible for Romeo’s death and the people he killed. He engaged Mercutio and held a grudge against Romeo for crashing his party.