Emma Marris uses many types of persuasive elements in her essay “Emma Marris: In Defense of Everglade Pythons”. In her writing she persuades her readers that the pythons should be allowed to be in the everglades since it is not their fault that they are there in the first place. She uses metaphors to relate to the reader and word choice to enhance her writing. Metaphors are widely used tools by writers to engage the reader and to make him/her understand the text further. Marris uses them throughout this passage and it makes the information relatable and easy for the intended audience to comprehend. When she explains her conversation with E. O. Wilson she states, “He then suggested that I was carrying around a white flag of surrender, and I rejoined that I never enlisted in the war …show more content…
In Marris’ case, she uses it to make herself appear competent and as though she is fully educated on the subject. To persuade another to agree with one’s own argument, he/she must at least seem to know what he/she is talking about. People want opinions from educated individuals. In turn, Marris makes herself out to be one of those individuals. Just in the first paragraph she uses words such as “fascinating”, “enormous”, and “intrinsically”. These could have easily been substituted with “interesting”or “big”. Instead she uses more intellectual words to appear as a reliable source. Ensuring the reader’s trust is vital in making a persuasive essay and this is what Marris does over and over again in her writing. There are many different tools that Marris uses in her passage “Emma Marris: In Defense of Everglade Pythons” to persuade her audience that the pythons should be allowed in the everglades. Her use of metaphors and her word choice both engage the reader and make herself out to be an intelligent author. These are essential qualities in building an argument and persuading a reader in believing one’s
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Barbara Ehrenreich describes to us what she believes today’s world thinks about the definition of civility. Her purpose is to argue about the misconception of civility. She believes that “competitive gratitude” is not what having etiquette is about and that it is absolutely absurd to be forced into fake politeness. Ehrenreich uses satire and irony to clearly differentiate between civility and unnecessary flattery. In her second sentence, Ehrenreich uses the oxymoron “heck-no” and “with all due respect” together to mock the critics that claim that America needs a little more civility.
The reading states that several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that the measures in the reading passage are unsuccessful and cause unwanted damage and refutes each of the authors ' reasons. First, the reading states that one way to prevent the spread of the toad would be to build a national fence. The professor opposes this point by saying that this way will not stop the spread of the cane toad.
Adam B. Summers, in his essay Bag Ban Bad For Freedom and Environment, effectively utilizes numerous stylistic and literary devices that persuade the reader. Summers utilizes facts, disproves various counter arguments and uses logical and emotional reasoning to persuade the reader to agree to his claim. However, Summers’ argument falls short due to the lack of power, as he holds no highly esteemed position of power. This, in addition to his colloquialism, intimates that he is just a layman and tells the reader that the source is not to be trusted.
In Jimmy Carter’s foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, he strongly advocates for the preservation of the Artic Refuge. To build upon his argument and persuade his readers, Jimmy Carter by providing specific facts about the wildlife that resides in the Arctic Refuge. In addition, he provides reasoning to support his claim such as, how the people living in that area would be affected. Finally, his selective and persuasive word choice further builds upon his argument and evokes the reader. Jimmy Carter supports his own idea by providing evidence related to his experience.
Most people feel protective towards things they love, and hate the idea of losing those things. In his foreward to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, President Jimmy Carter presents a case for why he believes the national park ought to be preserved, playing upon that protective feeling. The piece uses a mostly emotional appeal to convince the reader, with some factual backing. The piece is organized in such a way that it carries the reader through Carter’s argument, building within the reader an emotional connection to the Refuge. The piece primarily uses its organization and emotive word choice to persuade the reader, as well as a small amount of factual evidence.
The state of California recently banned the trapping of bobcats throughout the entire state. Carla Hall, a reporter for the Los Angeles Times, shared her opinion on the topic through an editorial. Immediately, the author establishes tone in the first paragraph. After briefly stating that the murder of Cecil the lion in Zimbabwe caused people around the world to become enraged, she writes, “...there is good-- and heartening!-- news from the wilds of California!” This opening sentence shows the author’s tone by taking on a glass-half-full attitude-- an optimistic and pleased tone for most article.
Breyden Baker Mrs. Guritz English 11 12 January 2023 Unit 3 Essay As people, we use persuasion techniques in our lives everyday, even though we may not realize it. There are many different ways and types of persuasion, authors also use them to write stories, and people use them in their everyday lives. There are pathos, logos, and ethos. Also repetition and alliteration could be used, and they are very effective when used in the right sense.
Suzan Harjo’s, “Last Rites for Indian Dead”,is a student persuasive essay criticizing the destruction of Indian remains. She strongly believes that this is an injustice to American Indians and their remains should be protected by law. She uses rhetorical appeal along with facts and her opinions to why Congress should pass a bill to make sure that her, along with her other families relative’s remains aren’t put up for show in museums. Harjo employs the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos effectively. However, her use of logical appeal causes her readers to doubt her claim.
The use of language throughout the essay shows that she knows what she is talking about while making it easy on the reader. Even though the diction isn’t the juiciest I have seen before, she is able to get her point across easily while being able to keep the audience’s attention throughout the whole essay. All of this ultimately comes down to her strong use of ethos and logos to get her point across in this essay. She relies more on statistics and quotes from outside sources to present her argument which ultimately makes it much more effective. Her credibility is established in the first paragraph with her use of the statistic in the first sentence which makes it much easier for her audience to listen to her and agree with her
Did you know Burmese pythons are causing many problems ? in this essay i will be explaining why when these pythons get to big there owners release them into the wild or the everglades. People choose these snakes because of there beautiful skin. Burmese pythons have been lowering the ecosystem .since these snakes have no wildlife predators they have been eating rabbits and more.
By saying this, Eleanor presents the rhetorical device pathos, because she uses inspirational words to grab attention and connect with the listeners in a way that relates to them. She also uses vivid language to truly intrigue the audience to compromise and work together to provide peace for the country. Eleanor uses a strong form of ethos in the quote from paragraph 10 , “ This declaration is based upon the spiritual fact
People seem to have come up with a solution against these pythons. " ... The challenge is to kill and hunt Burmese pythons..." This illustrates that people are willing to take responsibility for their actions. The only question is, is challenging people to come hunt Burmese pythons
The announcement of a new, censored, version of Mark Twain’s classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn sparked controversy across the United States regarding which version provides the better educational experience. Even though the revised publication may be more politically correct in the present day, it dampens the milieu of the story. Additionally, the argument for censorship in the novel is weak considering the social discomfort created from word ‘nigger’ can be used to form an educational lesson or discussion. The original edition of the novel provides would be a better a inclusion to an educational curriculum because it includes improved syntax when compared to Alan Gribben’s publication. Dr. Sarah Churchwell of the University of East
Allowing a deadly viper to roam free increases the risk of being bitten. Buckley coerces the jury into believing it would be downright sinful to allow such a threat to live. Buckley makes Bigger’s guilt appear impossible to deny. His appeals create a call for action to put the beast to
As a result she proves no matter which stage in life, people still desire things that do not belong to them. Lydia Tanner expresses herself to convey her point to her readers vigorously by entertaining them. She does this by implementing dialogue, humor, and giving relatable examples throughout her essay.