Should America Use Atomic Bombs Against Japan?
Should the USA have used atomic bombs against Japan to end World War II?
War always takes several lives; it destroys balance and brings a bloody story. World War II began on 1939 until 1945 being this one black memory of mankind history. On August 6 and 9, 1945 Japan was scene of one of the cruelest attacks in the history. The United States´ President Harry S. Truman authorized the launch of the atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ending with the life of almost 214.000 people, civilians mostly. However, it is analyzed the necessity of those actions starting of the hypothesis of what was right; therefore, a questionable point of view emerges. USA should not have launched atomic bombs because they caused an unnecessary damage, dead people, damage to the environment and diseases to the citizens.
…show more content…
The atomic bombs were launched in order to show superiority. They detonated on less than 5 seconds causing a collateral disaster in the cities that received the impacts. On the impact corresponding to Hiroshima 80000-people died, leaving after the bang a desolated city. It was not taken into account the innocent people who lived there, they just were killed for power. For example, a kid, who could have offered a lot of things to humanity was, murdered without mercy. Besides, there was another bomb that exploded in Nagasaki where another 40000-people died owing to the war. It is possible to see some silhouettes on the buildings of people who died because of the shock wave. To sum up, innocent people were murdered due to the fact that were launched atomic bombs; it was not taken into account if they had any participation in the world
How Did The Us Make Decisions About The Atomic Bomb Dbq
732 Words | 3 PagesThis demonstrates how it was mentally scarring for their people to experience. Students were at loss since they were too young to understand what to do in a case like this. The bombing of Nagasaki caused 39,000 deaths and left 25,000 injured. The historical narrative, Hiroshima as Victimization argues that
To What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb
608 Words | 3 PagesWWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.
Hiroshima Bombing Dbq
735 Words | 3 Pages(Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). The bomb killed eighty thousand people instantly. Radiation exposure killed tens of thousands more. The bomb destroyed ninety percent of one of Japan’s biggest cities in an instant. Therefore, the event that occurred at Hiroshima was a huge shock to the
Atomic Bomb Dbq Research Paper
757 Words | 4 PagesDuring WWII there were many deaths and terrible battles but the worst of all of them was America dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This tactic of bombing a city was the wrong decision by America, it was completely barbaric and was an act of total war something no country should ever use. The main issues with this decision was that it wasn’t an attack on a military base like Pearl Harbor but it was an attack on a populated city and Japan was prepared to surrender because they knew America and the Allied Powers would win the war. The main argument others have is that the Atomic bomb saved lives by creating a fast end to the war so it wouldn’t be strung out resulting in more deaths on both sides but Japan was prepared to surrender
The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima
805 Words | 4 PagesImagine the sudden loss of 70,000 lives: 70,000 futures obliterated, 70,000 bodies decimated, and 70,000 families grieving. That was the impact of the bombing of Hiroshima. Similar results happened at Nagasaki. The decision of whether or not the United States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been heavily debated for decades. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima was not a military necessity because there were other options, it was ethically wrong, and the United States was already winning.
Drop The Bomb Dbq
345 Words | 2 PagesTherefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and
To What Extent Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq
687 Words | 3 PagesFirst of all, in the case of the Americans the bomb was compared to the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Truman says in a press release, “We have used it against those who attacked without warning at Pearl Harbor, against those who have abandoned the pretense of obeying international laws of warfare” (Doc I). Second, the bombing of Pearl Harbor was an uncalled for action that was against the “laws of international warfare” and was rectified by the atomic bomb. The soldiers in Europe were extremely relieved that they would not have to invade, which would be a fatal battle where our soldiers would be shot at constantly and have bombs flying around them while they were rushing the beaches of Japan (Doc H). This bomb avoided the invasion of Japan which would have ended in an estimated 1.7 to 4 million casualties for the Allied powers (OI ladailypost.com).
Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay
810 Words | 4 PagesThe bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very controversial event in history that led to the inevitable end of WWII. Some think that the bomb was necessary to end the war and without it, the war couldn’t end. But others think the bomb was overkill because the Japanese were already on the brink of surrender. Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had positive and negative effects.
Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
676 Words | 3 PagesWas America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.
Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper
1838 Words | 8 PagesImagine that there is a decision to be made to launch the atomic bomb or not. The bomb was launched but was it justified? Years ago during WWll, a scientist Albert Einstein sent a letter to the president. It said that Germany was creating a bomb that would cause major destruction and the United States had to make one as well. Scientists started making the bomb and it became the Project Manhattan.
Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
852 Words | 4 PagesIn the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
Why Was Hiroshima Justified
1840 Words | 8 Pagesthe bomb’s code name was “Little Boy”. Three days later, on August 9th, 1945, America dropped another bomb on Nagasaki with the code name “Fat Man”. As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by “Little Boy” alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. The dropping of the Atom bomb on Hiroshima is an extremely debatable issue with no right or wrong answer. In this essay I will describe both sides to the argument then conclude using my final opinion on whether I am for or against the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.
Atomic Bomb Dbq
311 Words | 2 PagesUp to 40,000 feet buildings collapsed, and homes were destroyed up to ½ of a mile of both towns. The total number of houses that were there before the atomic explosion was 50,000, and the total houses and buildings that were destroyed were 19,587, but 30,413 were undamaged. The souls of people who died because of the bomb in Nagasaki 135,000 and the total number of people who died in Hiroshima was 64,000. People died into dust with the nuclear chemicals that were impossible to survive if you were too close to the bomb. People who survived still have nuclear acid in their bodies that can give them numerous amounts of cancer when they grow up if they survived still in their young age.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb
630 Words | 3 PagesImagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and
Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq
882 Words | 4 PagesAfterwards, the United States declared war on Japan, and joined allies against the axis powers. The United States’ use of the atomic bombs is justified because it saved American lives; Japan was given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S. The atomic bombs on Japan saved many American lives. Document 15 reads: The entire population of Japan is
More about Should America Use Atomic Bombs Against Japan?
How Did The Us Make Decisions About The Atomic Bomb Dbq
732 Words | 3 PagesTo What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb
608 Words | 3 PagesHiroshima Bombing Dbq
735 Words | 3 PagesAtomic Bomb Dbq Research Paper
757 Words | 4 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima
805 Words | 4 PagesDrop The Bomb Dbq
345 Words | 2 PagesTo What Extent Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq
687 Words | 3 PagesHiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay
810 Words | 4 PagesAtomic Bomb Dbq Essay
676 Words | 3 PagesAtomic Bomb Justified Research Paper
1838 Words | 8 PagesShould We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
852 Words | 4 PagesWhy Was Hiroshima Justified
1840 Words | 8 PagesAtomic Bomb Dbq
311 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb
630 Words | 3 PagesAtomic Bomb Justified Dbq
882 Words | 4 Pages