Silence is golden. Elie Wiesel states that “being silent means being complicit”. But that’s not true. Because there are plenty of stories where people go above and beyond the call of duty and end up making the situation worse. For example, when a group of hoodlums had approached me. Now the evidence says that the German Workers are awful people because they didn't intervene by helping the Jewish people flee from the camp. But instead, we're throwing bread and making them kill each other now a regular person would have spoken up and probably help them but, let me tell you why that was wrong. With the heavy influence of the Nazis, people wouldn't want to go against the Nazi regime now let's say for example one of the workers did speak up there will probably plenty of spies or one of his own workers would have probably …show more content…
Speaking up is a very situational there are times where speaking up alters the outcome for the better and other times where you’ve made it worse by not being silent. I had seen it happen before my eyes, a 7th grader getting bullied by an 8th grader. One of the 7th grader's friends had run and told a teacher the next day the 8th grader wasn’t there but, when he came back the bullying was worse than before. Now, this isn’t for all situations but, sometimes turning away is the answer. After walking back from watching a movie with my friends a group of troublemakers had approached us asking “where are you from?” stunned by the question I had turned to my friends no even fazed walking the group of thief’s. I shortly followed them pushing past the group and after we had walked past them my friends started to make fun of me for putting my hands up. But in that situation if my friends were to speak up or if I made a comment they didn’t like they could have pulled out a gun and ended us right there, I wasn’t complacent with what they were doing but in that case, silence was the best
Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, Nobel Laureate and the author of Night, gave the speech “Perils of Indifference” on April 12, 1999 during the Millennium Lecture series which was hosted by President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton. According to Bill Clinton “The White House millennium program will guide and direct America's celebration of the millennium by showcasing the achievements that define us as a nation -- our culture, our scholarship, our scientific exploration," going into the new twenty-first century. Wiesel was invited to Lecture to speak about the horrific Holocaust which happened during the years 1933-1945 and to try help move on from the past it as the world goes into a new millennium. In the summer of 1944, Wiesel
The Actors Simon, one of the Pharisees: owner of a house large enough to have a dinner guests recline at a table. It would not be much of a stretch that this Simon had wealth and position in the city. It may reasonable to assume that Simon was a better class of Pharisee who had a certain measure of respect for our Lord’s teaching, and was half-inclined to acknowledge Him as a prophet (Luke 7v39). It would be a stretch to think that this Simon is connected to any other Simon mentioned in the NT. Simon was a very common name in Palestine, and maybe Luke’s way of making the person common with those that share his same contempt for this peculiar authority being taught by Jesus.
Humanity's Responsibility “And this is one of the most important lessons of this, outgoing century’s wide-ranging experiments in good and evil.” This is a sample from Elie Wiesel's “Perils of Indifference” speech. Elie as a Holocaust survivor and made it a job to show America how cruel and horrible it is to be absent during crisis. Wiesel uses ethos to show his knowledge and experience on the Holocaust subject, imagery to describe the suffering and cruelty toward the Jewish people, and rhetorical questions to convey how we, as a society need to be able to question our actions, as well as our inactions.
“Never shall I forget those moments that murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams to ashes.” This quote explains how traumatizing the first night of the next two years would be like for Eliezer. In Elie Wiesel’s book, Night, he retells his horrific story about him and his father enduring the challenges of multiple concentration camps. Eliezer changes throughout this book by, questioning his faith, learning self-preservation, and realizing that evil is worse than he could imagine. Primarily, Eliezer believed in an all powerful God, but after he experienced the tragedy of the concentration camps, he questions his faith.
The movie Carved in Silence was a very provoking and eye opening documentary for me. It depicted the experience of the Chinese immigrants of Angel Island very well through the narration and the dramatic recreation. As an immigrant, the opening scene and the many stories told evoked many memories and reflections of my family 's journey and aspirations. The stories and descriptions in this documentary were very surreal because they were too hard to believe.
The writing “We Choose Honor” has a very moving subject that includes a variety of syntax, diction, imagery, and tone to achieve its claim. The subject itself is 9/11, the catastrophic disaster that moved the United States in a way it hadn’t in decades. With such a large topic at hand, Elie Wiesel takes the disaster and shapes it into a writing that emotionally captures millions of readers. The all-around purpose of this writing is to empower and inform the people reading; Unfortunately, such an instance will be forever engraved in the skull’s of those affected by this tragedy, and Wiesel was one of them. Nonetheless, the tragic loss of thousands of individuals on that day will be eternally remembered through history.
“Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor -- never his victim, whose pain is magnified when he or she feels forgotten” (Wiesel, 1999, para. 10). Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and Nobel peace Laureate, demonstrates how the perils of indifference can affect the future to come. He strongly argues “indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred” (Wiesel, 1999, para. 9). Wiesel’s purpose was to point out to society that not only do we need to learn from our past, but change for the future.
The general statement made by Elie Wiesel in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, is that indifference is sinful. More specifically, Wiesel argues that awareness needs to be brought that indifference is dangerous. He writes “Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end”. In this speech, Wiesel is suggesting that indifference is dangerous it can bring the end to many lives. In conclusion Wiesel's belief is suggesting that indifference is an end, it needs to be noticed and taken care of.
Personal Narrative Essay One word is worth one coin, silence is worth two. This theme is the most significant in the novel The Chosen, by Chaim Potok. Reuven speaks about his experience with Danny, his friend through silence, and the difficulties they face in fact they can talk but can’t because Reb Saunders forbids Danny to speak or communicate with Reuven in any way after they’ve become best friends. This theme corresponds to my life and my personal experiences.
Does being alone for help a person to think well? In Pico Iyer’s article, “The Joy of Quiet,” he addresses the issue of children not having enough time alone. The question posed by many is what made rhetorical strategies did he use to convince the reader of his main idea. Iyer uses many different types of rhetorical strategies, but the ones, which stood out were the evidences he backed up his main idea with. In “The Joy of Quiet,” Pico Iyers convinces the reader of his main idea that children should spend time away from electronic devices in order to gain more control of their lives by the use of textual evidence, statistical evidence and anecdotal evidence.
War is a harsh reality that is inflicted upon the unwilling through the “need” of it’s predecessors and those whom wish it. All Quiet on The Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque is about 19 year old Paul and his friends in the “Second Company”. Even though they are just out of school age, they have already seen things that many could not bear to even think about. Eventually, all of his friends die, and even Paul too, dies. Remarque uses diction and syntax as literary devices to express his anti-war theme, or lesson.
The stimulus I decided to use is “The Sound of Silence” - Simon and Garfunkel. When listening to the song and reading the lyrics, I thought of people who aren’t heard and are constantly in silence. After doing a bit of research, I decided to make our piece about selective mutism (a severe mental disorder where a person is unable to speak in certain social situations). I decided to choose this as it seemed to relate to the lyrics of the song. You can see the information I have collected and the monologues I wrote on page 3 of my supporting evidence.
In the book The Things They Carried, Tim O’brien explores various stories he experienced during his time serving in the Vietnam War. He goes in depth into the casualties of his fellow troops in order to analyze the significance and how it affected him and his friends psychologically. One of the many things he makes sure to include is the specific silence and sounds that occupies the tense situations they endure. Whether it is a death or a more uplifting moment, he never failed to include the recurring silence the environment produced. O’brien manipulates the use of silence throughout his novel to further enhance the reader 's imagination to get as close as they can to being as emotionally impacted the way O’brien was while experiencing the stories first-hand.
When your brother or sister hits you, you automatically want to hit them back harder or get revenge, right? Elie Wiesel chooses to do the opposite in the story “The Watch.” Elie Wiesel lived in a small religious town, then he was sent to Auschwitz. After being in Auschwitz he was sent to Buchenwald, for his religion. After the war he lived in France, then he moved to the U.S and became a teacher at Boston University.
“The Sound of Silence” by Simon and Garfunkel conveys through its lyrics that people are afraid to be put down for sharing their meaningful ideas and as such are trapped in their own personal ignorant bubbles that blindly follow the media. “The Sound of Silence” was released in Simon and Garfunkel’s debut album “Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.” in 1964; however it was initially a commercial failure. This caused the music duo to split up until their producer Tom Wilson got word that radio stations had been giving this song growing airplay. Tom Wilson remixed the track by overdubbing the original acoustic version with other instruments and released it as a single in 1965. This single quickly became famous hitting No.1 on the “Billboard Hot 100” in