ipl-logo

Similarities Between Checks And Balances

423 Words2 Pages

Federalists are folks that agreed with the Constitution while anti-federalists disagreed. The federalists wanted a strong natinal government so the nation could be protected. Anti-federalists thought that a strong executive could become a king and similar to a monarchy. Both sides relied on Virginia's vote to raitfy the Constitution, and little states to follow behind, so it could go into effect. New Hampshire was the final state to vote and the Constitution went into effect, so the people celebrated on a day known as the 4th of July today. Federalists supported the constituion and wanted a strong elected government. They believed that a powerful national government was needed so that the nation would be protected and to address domestic issues. Federalists also believed that the Constitution should be allowed to place limitations on the powers of each branch of government. So therefore, Checks and Balances …show more content…

They were passionate that the Constitution created a strong executive authority and that the president could easily become king by being reelected pver and over again. They also wanted a Bill of Rights specifically protecting citizens from the national government. Anti-federalists wanted fewer limits on political participation by all citizens. They didnt want the Constitution to go into effect, hoping that nine states wouldnt ratify it. Federalist and Anti-federalist depended on Virginia's vote since it was a big powerful state and smaller states would follow behind. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote 85 essays in newspapers in support of the Constitution. While they were waiting for Virginia's vote, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the Constitutuion. So then it went into effect on July 4, 1788. They had a parade where militiamen that fought in the Revolution

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

    238 Words  | 1 Pages

    Federalists believed the Constitution provided just the right mix of power and limitations. The federalists wanted to make sure the central government either had more or less power. The first government of the US was a one-house legislature with no executive. It couldn't raise money, it relied on the states for military power, and was generally seen as ineffective and weak. The US Constitution was written to remedy those weaknesses and provide the US with a better, more representative form of government.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Hamilton And The Federalists

    314 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists believed in many things and had strong support. They believed in strong federal government and rule by the wealthy class, which caused them to favor the idea of national bank and business. They argued that the national bank was allowed because the Consitution gave Congress the power to issue money and regulate trade. They also trusted a loose interpretation of the Consitution, this made them think they had implied powers, which were powers not included in the Consitution. Another thing that the Federalists believed in was protective tariffs.

    Read More

  • Hamilton Compare And Contrast Essay

    464 Words  | 2 Pages

    When our government first started, our founding fathers had different views on how we should interpret the constitution. Influential people like Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had opposing sides to topics, so they went and formed political parties. Jefferson formed the party known as the Democratic-Republicans, and Hamilton formed the group known as the Federalists. One topic they faced was whether they should be strict or loose on viewing the constitution. The Federalist believed that we should look at the constitution very loosely.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    481 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists believed the Executive branch overruled the other two branches of government. They also thought the rights of the people should be listed. This is to ensure that people can’t be unfairly accused over something they have the right to do or say.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Whigs And Democrats

    1041 Words  | 5 Pages

    5. Compare and contrast the views of the Federalists, early Republicans (Jeffersonians), Whigs and Democrats (Jacksonians) on a.) the powers of the federal government relative to the states b.) the powers of the president relative to Congress. a.) STATES Federalists believed liberty was more secure in large republics, where government was more distant from the passions of the people and factions were larger yet weaker as a whole. They believed a bill of rights was unnecessary or even dangerous (could be construed as a finite list of rights).

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of New Constitution

    1120 Words  | 5 Pages

    Introduction The 1780s is believed as a crucial period in the history of the United States which, around then, was consider as a new country. The monetary stagnation confronted by the congress in around mid-1780s were a surprise for the people in America, which in the end was brought a major concern by the natives. The conflict with the British people had greatly damaged the America’s economy. The British navy had taken full control of the United States of America’s seashore, therefor American can’t trade.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    204 Words  | 1 Pages

    Federalist and Anti-federalist had two different views for the government. The Federalist wanted a centered government that would make the states one continental nation. The Anti-federalist wanted each state to have their own government. These totally different view point lead to a lot of heated debates. The major points were, what rights to protect, which form of government is best and how to divide government power.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    1480 Words  | 6 Pages

    Federalists (Pro-Constitution) and Anti-Federalists (Anti-Constitution) were two groups that emerged and had a huge impact on the issue regarding the Constitution (61). My thesis is that the Constitution was able to bring both of the groups concerns together and offer a solution, which would eventually change the future of the 13 colonies. Problems began to arise for some in Great Britain. There were 13 colonies that were heavily impacted. They became angry.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast A Strong State Government

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    They thought it was too much like Great Britain and they didn’t want that again. A strong state government helped reduce the power of the president and that is exactly what Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists wanted. The Anti-Federalists used the Articles of Confederation in most of their decisions. The Articles greatly influenced the Democratic-Republicans in most of their opinions. The Anti- Federalists liked the Articles better because it gave states more powers and rights than the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Views Of The Anti Federalists

    1089 Words  | 5 Pages

    he Anti-Federalists were centered around two fundamental things; making an oppressive government and absence of individual power on the off chance that the focal government turned out to be all the more intense (Kaminski et al 3). They held the conviction that the Constitution gave the focal government a great deal of forces through the lawmaking body, legal and official. They were of the contention that, much the same as King George III, the official would be onerous to the general population as opposed to ensuring their individual rights. In supporting their claim, the counter Federalists contended that Americans had been included in a grisly and exceedingly expensive progressive clash to wind up free from British run the show. Setting themselves in a place like that of an unregulated government would not be valuable to the eventual fate of the country.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

    138 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists side was that the constitution was enough to protect peoples rights. While the Anti-federalists believed that if they didn't have there rights stated they would be taken away so after the constitution was ratified the anti federalists fought for the bill of rights. In conclusion, the Federalists

    Read More

  • Anti Federalists Research Paper

    440 Words  | 2 Pages

    I’m a big believer in taking power into your hands and that if you want something done right you have to do it yourself. They wanted an established government governed by the people while the Anti-Federalists desired to stay with the monarchy and never sought to seek change. Federalists wanted to separate the powers of the government into their respected branches, avoiding a corrupt government controlled only by the rich, the high class and the powerful. Federalists believed in a centralized government that would be run by the people as a whole and a government that was separated into branches. Anti-Federalists wanted just the opposite; these two completely opposing viewpoints caused a great deal of aggression and tension in the

    Read More

  • Difference Between Federalist And Anti Federalists

    150 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Anti-federalists wanted more power for people, they believed states better represented the needs of the people, and the hardness for

    Read More

  • Anti Federalists Arguments

    487 Words  | 2 Pages

    The federalists believed in having a strong national government with supreme power over state governments. They also argued that if they were to give too much power to the states, it would no doubt create a government with not enough power to act. They believed this was great movement that would protect the people's rights from the Bill of Rights, government, and the

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    659 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1787 many important people, like Benjamin Franklin and John Hancock, had different views and beliefs on ratifying the Constitution. This lead to two groups forming the federalists and the anti federalists. The federalist believed that the Constitution should be ratified for the sake of a strong government, while the anti federalist believed that the Constitution should not be ratified because of the lack of individual rights. Specifically, the antifederalists point of view was more reasonable towards the public due to the fact the anti federalists wanted power within each state and not the central government. One reason why the anti federalist’s point of view is more sensible than the federalists is because the anti federalist thought

    Read More

More about Similarities Between Checks And Balances

Open Document