Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

481 Words2 Pages

The new constitution couldn’t please everyone. Some people liked it but some didn't. The two sides were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution, whereas the Anti-Federalists were opposed to it. They would have debates about ratifying the Constitution. They needed to debate in each state to decide if the state was voting for or against the Constitution and the new government. The Anti-Federalists thought the new Constitution gave the Federal government too much power over the states. They believed that Congress was given an absurd amount of power as well. Anti-Federalists figured the powers of the branches wouldn’t be separated well. The Anti-Federalists believed the Executive branch overruled the other two branches of government. They also thought the rights of the people should be listed. This is to ensure that people can’t be unfairly accused over something they have the right to do or say. …show more content…

They stated that the separation of powers would stay in place. This means that the Executive branch couldn’t have too much power over the other branches. They also argued against the listing of the rights. The Federalists believed that listing the rights could be bad. They said that they couldn’t list all of the rights. This means that people wouldn’t have a set group of rights. It would also be hard to keep track of them. People could also violate the rights that aren’t listed. Anti- Federalists responded pleading that we should have listed rights so that we couldn’t ignore them. Simply put, the Federalists thought listing the rights would be dangerous, but the Anti-Federalists did

Open Document