ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

468 Words2 Pages

After the Revolutionary War the thirteen colonies wanted a government to replace the British system they wanted overthrown. So they came up with the Articles of Confederation. The articles went into effect in 1781, but were short lived because they had too many flaws in them to work effectively. Even though they went into effect there was still a problem the colonies had and that was that they had no real national leadership. Another inherent weakness was that congress did not have the power to levy or collect taxes from individuals. Taxes were collected by each state from the citizens within and then the money was too turned over to the government. Another flaw was the fact that congress did not have any power when it came to regulating …show more content…

When political leaders met in Philadelphia to figure out how they could strengthen the Articles of Confederation they soon realized that they needed to replace the entire thing with the US Constitution. Those that did not support the constitution were became known as the anti-federalist and those that supported it were known as the Federalists. The federalist wrote the Federalists Papers that were published in newspapers trying to gain support for the constitution. Two states, Massachusetts and South Carolina wrote up a resolution list to ratify the Constitution in order to get them to support it. Both states wanted “all Powers not expressly delegated by the aforesaid Constitution to be reserved to the several States to be by them exercised” (Avalon Project, 1788). Massachusetts also wanted one representative for every 30,000 people from the census that the Constitution mentioned until there were 200 representatives. According to the reading last week the antifederalists wanted a bill of rights to secure the rights of the people. Madison argued with them stating that “the constitution is itself….a BILL OF RIGHTS” (Divine 2013, p. 152). The Antifederalists wanted to make certain that the people’s rights of free speech, and freedom of religion were protected and this is one thing that the Bill of

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    419 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses as well as positives. From the pros side we have Josh DiGiorgio and Jacob Chrispim. From the cons side we have Grayson Jons and Lexi Rosmarin. We will start with the cons.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    605 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the American secession from Britain in 1776, the colonies needed to implement a form of self-governance. In the early years of the Revolutionary War, the colonies drafted the Articles of Confederation, which outlined an agreement to loosely ally the states. At the time, American colonists were extremely wary of strong central governments. Thus, under the Articles, the United States maintained a weak central government with strong state governments. With this situation in place, the success of the U.S. government was mixed.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    260 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the Independent War, each state already had its own laws. Speaking from a certain perspective, each state could be seen as an independent country. After America won its independence from the Great Britain in the Revolutionary War, the new country needed a mechanism to unify the thirteen states to form a government. The Articles of Confederation was the first national constitution that was acknowledged by the thirteen American states that was submitted to the Second continental Congress on July 12, 1776. It was sought to be the solution to group the thirteen states to be a country.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Articles Of Confederation

    578 Words  | 3 Pages

    er, the Articles placed the power in the hands of the state, which led to economic troubles; but it also led to leadership shortfall. The fact that there was no independent judiciary, no leader of foreign affairs, and an inability to deal with internal and external threats made, caused a lot of problems for America. Finally, the Articles of Confederation was ineffective in making a set of rules that made legislating under this structure inefficient. Each state had one vote, therefore, states with a large population or small population had the same weight in voting in Congress. It also took nine votes out of thirteen to approve legislation.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    774 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Revolutionary War had ended and the colonies successfully signed a treaty of paris with England, proclaiming their independence from Britain and establishing other terms of the treaty. No longer were the colonies divided, they had now become the United States of America and consisted of states. Throughout the colonists' "road to recovery" from Britain, and their journey to becoming a successful and powerful nation, they were faced with numerous challenges including one large one - creating a country! They needed to establish a strong but restricted central government, create a set of fair rules, laws, and regulations, and elect political leaders to represent each state and the nation as a whole, thus, the Articles of Confederation

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    825 Words  | 4 Pages

    Liberty Sumners 712 The Articles of Confederation were a great change to our Government. With time spent using this system, we realized the weaknesses associated with it. This lead to the Constitutional Convention being convened on 1787 in Philadelphia. We needed to find out what was weakening our Government.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    652 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most powerful objection raised by the Antifederalists, however, revolved around on the lack of protection for individual liberties in the Constitution. Most of the state constitutions of the era had built on the Virginia model that included an accurate protection of individual rights that could not be intruded upon by the state. This was seen as a central deserved fate of people's rights and was considered a major revolutionary improvement over the unwritten protections of the British constitution. The bill of rights was supported as an essential by anti-fed because in the original Constitution was seen as a real threat to individual citizens’ liberties. They believed that they didnt need to get rid of the articles of confederation but all they needed was to ammend it.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    Of course, the Federalists, who supported the Virginia Plan, wanted proportional representation while the Anti-Federalists, who supported the New Jersey Plan, wanted equal representation. The Federalists thought that an equal number of people should have an equal number of representatives while a different number of people should have a different number of representatives. They feared rule by minority. They also believed that no proper government could work on equal representation. The Anti-Federalists believed that if they were to have proportional representation that the small states would be “destroyed,” that the energy and stability of government would be in danger.

    Read More

  • What Are The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    History and Geography: Articles of Confederation Here are a few weakness of the Articles of Confederation • The Articles gave “immense power to the state government”. The state’s power to control the government according to their choice or belief was enforced. • The “states were not liable to make a payment to the Central Government but could offer money if they chose to”.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    453 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1781,the articles of confederation were ratified. This was the first form of central government in America. America just got out of a tyranny, so they tried their best to limit the government's power. This resulted in a very weak Central Government. What two main weaknesses of the articles of confederation caused the articles to be a bad form of government.

    Read More

  • What Are The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    113 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain. The Articles created a weak central government because of the fear that too much centralized political power would jeopardize liberty. It stated that the new national government be a “perpetual union.” The Articles formed a loose confederation of sovereign states. The central government could make treaties and alliances, keep up armed forces, and coin money but lacked the ability to levy taxes and regulate commerce.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Articles Of Confederation

    790 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before the Articles of Confederation were written, America was in the midst of a full blown revolution against Britain. The United States needed a government to seem like they were in control and help the U.S. become a respectable, independent nation. Thus the Articles of Confederation was written and adopted as the government. The Articles of Confederation were an improvement on the weak country of America’s government. However, the articles helped to improve several aspects such as forming a new government, an economy, and dictating what happens in the territories; but they also caused the nation hardships with no power in the federal government, and the economy was tanking.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    326 Words  | 2 Pages

    Confederations are loose unions of independent states in which most power resides in each state government. The United States of America originally created a confederation government in 1781 after declaring independence from Britain. The Articles of Confederation established the role of the United States’ national government, like maintaining an army and regulating foreign affairs. Though these articles, were well written, they were not thoroughly thought out. The Articles of Confederation had multiple weaknesses.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    1304 Words  | 6 Pages

    To rectify the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, a constitutional convention created a federal system and built into it practical devices to control factions who would otherwise pursue their own ends to the detriment of the larger society. Those safeguards were representative government, three branches of government that contained checks and balances, and a federal system. The branches are similar in their organization with elected leaders, legislators and judges. However, some states appoint their judges while the President decides Supreme Court Judges.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    After proclaiming independence from Great Britain, the United States needed an established document to help unify the thirteen colonies. The Articles of confederation being the first “constitution” was created to get individual states to come together as one. SerDaniella Herrera Page 1 3/8/18ving as a rough draft, this document was a loose outline for the federal government, which was meant to promote economic growth and help the people. The weak document led to the eventual ratification, which allowed the nation to adopt the new and improved constitution. The Articles of Confederation brought issues with trade, State Representation, and taxation that provoked the eventual ratification, allowing for the Constitution to take its place.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

Open Document