A persons’ preconceived notion that their authority has their best interest at hand can often lead to a corrupt society. According to Septima Poinsette Clark, “The greatest evil in our country today is...ignorance...We need to be taught to study rather than to believe.” In other words, people are taught to blindly believe what they are told without questioning whether it is right or wrong. This quote is valid because if the masses of a society believe in a corrupt authority then the few who rebel will be dismissed and thought of as outcasts. Two literary works that support this quote are “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. In both story’s the societies believe in an unjust authority which ultimately …show more content…
The lottery happens once a year, and consist of everyone in the village. The archaic lottery had been around since the village was first establish. The villagers never knew a time when the lottery was not around. The kids were the first to show up “… Selecting the smoothest and roundest stones” (Jackson). They were accustomed to the routine they had been taught. After the children came the men then the women who all flocked in like sheep. The man in charge of it all was Mr. Summer he had no family and was the only one “Who had time and energy to devote to civic activities” (Jackson). One man oversaw the lottery that decided the fate of one “lucky” contestants’ life. No one spoke up about this normalized lottery expect for Mr. Adams. Without support from anyone he mentioned “that over in the north village they’re talking of giving up the lottery” (Jackson). “Pack of crazy fools” was the response he got from the oldest man in the village who had been in the lottery for 77 years (Jackson). No else spoke out because the of the old saying “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon” (Jackson). This implied the lottery was held as a ritual for good crops to come and no one wanted to starve so they never preached against it. The general view from the people was that the system was in place for a reason, that’s what they had been taught since they were …show more content…
They are taught to believe that the handicaps placed upon them make everyone “… equal every which way” (Vonnegut). The two main characters Hazel and George had recently had Harrison, their 14-year-old son, taken from the by the H-G men the policy of their era. They could not sob over this for long because “Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn’t think about anything except in short bursts” (Vonnegut). As for George “while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear” (Vonnegut). This was required by the law and caused frequent extremely loud noises to occur in his head which disrupted his thought train. This kept him and people like him “from taking unfair advantage of their brains” (Vonnegut). Everyone in this society had some sort of handicap so that nobody was better than anyone else. The government had total control over how the society was run “… due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General” (Vonnegut). It seemed to be like the only people without handicaps were the people high up in the government. There were also laws put in place so that no one would tamper with their handicaps. “Two years in prison and two thousand dollars fine for every
In the community, they had a Handicapper General which was the person who was in charge of the handicaps. Handicaps are basically restrictions. If you were strong you would wear weights, if you were pretty you would wear a mask, and if you were smart they would put a buzzer in your ear to scatter away all of your thoughts. Everyone was brought down to the same level and had no freedom to be themselves all because the Handicapper General wanted to make a utopia but in reality, she was making a dystopia. "Two years in prison and two thousand dollars fine for every ball I took out," said George.
However, society in previous generations are not as great as they are depicted. In the olden times, traditions are often followed by blind obedience; In other words, people follow societal norms without much reasoning. In the short stories "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut and "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson,
The same goes for George even though we don't know his appearance we know he was an intellectual person because he falls into the same category of being born with a great mind. “and George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. ”(232). His thoughts were being disrupted through a device , this is considered to be fair to the average thinkers. Vonnegut Jr. portrays his ideas towards the illusion of equality because he mentions equality at the beginning of the story, explaining the wonders of everyone being equal in their own individuality.
Some background information about utopian fiction is the creation of an ideal society, or utopia, as the setting foror dystopia. Dystopia, which is the direct opposite of utopia, is a term used to describe a utopian society in which things have gone wrong. Both utopias and dystopias share characteristics of science fiction and fantasy, and both are usually set in a future in which technology has been used to create perfect living conditions. Utopia is a perfect society, everyone is working together, and everyone can do what they love to do by being free, and being equal. Therefore my specific utopian characteristic essay will focus on equality.
On the other hand, Vonnegut Jr. uses his story "Harrison Bergeron" to illustrate the lack of empathy people in society shows towards one another. In this society, people with strong attributes such as beauty, intelligence, and strength are forced to lower themselves by wearing handicaps, so they will not be a threat to other people. For an example, one character named George is very intelligent therefore he had a mental handicap in his ear, unlike his wife Hazel. Her intelligence was average, so she could only think in short burst. For an example, the text states, "Every twenty seconds or so, the
Harrison Bergeron and The Lottery both have a sort of calm tone throughout the stories. The Lottery starts off with a warm, welcoming tone, then evolves to a more detached The serious tone of the stories lead you away from thinking that the two societies are anything but normal. While each story ends jarringly the tones are oddly deadpan; both of the stories end with the characters brushing off the death of a loved one. A cold, chilling, or creepy tone would have taken away from the surprise ending.
In the book The Pearl and the short story “The Lottery”, the topic of morals is provoked in the reader/watcher’s mind. In The Pearl, people try to steal a valuable pearl, yet in “The Lottery”, people randomly choose a member of their community to brutally murder, or stone. This makes people think of themselves, whether about money or hoping not to be stoned. In the lottery, the moral debate has to do with tradition.
While real life traditions are rarely so extreme, Jackson’s exaggerated fictional example emphasizes her point to great effect. By the end of the story, the audience is convinced that the town is wrong to uphold the lottery tradition, but Jackson is not really writing about a lottery; she is writing about how damaging it can
The Lottery and Harrison Bergeron, both share common themes and differences in their stories. One would be that both societies claim theses “traditions give them unity and equality”. Another theme commonly shared is both stories show how people can be blind to tradition. Although these stories are similar they have their differences one being Harrison Bergeron tried dyeing like a martyr while Ms. Hutchinson died trying to save her own life. In both of theses stories society believes that their barbaric traditions bring them equality and unity.
Elie Wiesel once said, “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.” “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson is a story about a small town that has a lottery in which one person is picked randomly to be killed. Tessie Hutchinson, the lottery “winner”, believes the lottery is fair up until she gets chosen. “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut is a story about a society in 2081 where all people are equal. Harrison disobeys the rules and is forced to lower his level as a human being, while George, Harrison’s father, will only obey the rules even if it means losing his memory.
In this short story, everything has to do with equality. No one can be more intelligent, stronger, or more attractive. Handicaps are making people unequal. People in this short story isn’t equal because the most intelligent people have to suffer because of the handicaps. “Every twenty minutes or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantages of their brain” (page 2).
In the short story “Harrison Bergeron” Vonnegut criticizes egalitarianism through the usage of symbolism and Irony , ultimately demonstrating how the government's ability to limit an individual's potential is harmful to society. Firstly, in this story, symbolism is used to reveal the effects of individuals being restricted in this society. One of the characters in this story, George is extremely smart and sensitive but unfortunately been crippled by the government's handicapping program. When George makes intelligent remarks or thinks analytically about situations “every twenty seconds or so, [a] transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains (Vonnegut 33). George’s brain handicap symbolizes a legitimate restriction that the government has placed on his body.
These handicaps are an attempt at making it so no one is inferior to anyone and there is no competition. In “Harrison Bergeron”, Vonnegut uses description and multiple plot lines to show that true equality is impossible to obtain, and in an effort to make everyone equal, people aren’t able to utilize the talents that they have. Vonnegut uses description in order to set up the problem for his reader. By using description,
Throughout centuries, traditions and rituals have had the ability to control one’s behavior. In Shirley Jackson’s, “The Lottery”, she tells the reader of a small village. On the surface, this community may seem relatively normal. However, despite the picturesque appeal, this falsely serene village has a distinct deceitful flaw. On June 27th, every year, a lottery takes place.
Adam’s and Old Man Warner’s discussion about the idea of giving up the lottery. Old Man Warner states that “there’s always been a lottery” (Jackson 142). The inference of Old Man Warner’s words and tone suggests that there will always be a lottery, and that it should always remain, that it is wrong to question its existence. Given the violent nature of the lottery’s results and its enduring tradition throughout generations of participants, each succeeding generation obviously grows accustom to the violence and brutality it calls for. The children, for example, readily prepare for the occasion by amassing “a great pile of stones in one corner of the square and [guarding] it” (Jackson 139).