Snyder V Phelps Summary
Supreme Court Case in a Bag Snyder v. Phelps On his way to his son 's funeral, Albert Snyder could see the tops of picketers’ signs, but never knew what had been written on them until watching a news broadcast later that night. Fred Phelps and some of his followers from the Westboro Baptist church were picketing on public land a few hundred feet from the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder. The picketers displayed signs stating things that could be found offensive and personally targeting the Snyder family. With signs with things like “Thank God for Dead Soldiers,” “America is Doomed,” and "Don 't Pray for the USA" (even though he could not see them in times of the funeral service) Snyder sued Phelps and the church with claims that their actions have caused him severe emotional distress, intrusion upon seclusion, and civil conspiracy. Phelps argued that the first amendment protected their form of speech. The District Court of Maryland agreed with Snyder and awarded him a total of five million dollars, but left the verdict otherwise intact. The Fourth Circuit contradicted the District Courts, concluding that Westboro’s statements were entitled to First Amendment protections on religious expression because those statements were on matters of public concern, were not provably false, and were expressed …show more content…
The 8-1 of the Supreme Court justices affirmed the lower court 's decision and agreed that the Phelps and his followers were "speaking" on matters of public concern on public property making them entitled to protection under the First Amendment. Justice Stephen J. Breyer filed a concurring opinion in which he wrote that while he agreed with the majority 's conclusion in the case, "I do not believe that our First Amendment analysis can stop at that point." Justice Samuel Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which he argued: "Our profound national commitment to free and open debate is not a license for the vicious verbal assault that occurred in this
Mccreary County V. ACLU Case Study
1108 Words | 5 PagesFirst, was displaying the Ten Commandments in courthouses and public schools a violation of the First Amendment?s establishment clause that prevents the government from passing laws in favor of any religion (Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, 2004a)? Secondly, was an assumption that the purpose of these displays had been for promoting religion enough of a determination for prohibition (Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, 2004a)? With a dissenting opinion on the matter, Justice Scalia first tells how he was in Rome, Italy on September 11, 2001. The President of the United States gave an address to the nation, ending it with ?
Mississippi University For Women Case Study
730 Words | 3 PagesThe fourteenth amendment states in the equal protection clause that states may not discriminate against any citizen for any reason, and must allow the same privileges, rights, and conservation. Hogan was on a mission to gain relief as well as compensation for the damages caused. The case was argued on March 22, 1982. The argument from Joe Hogan was proposed by advocate, Wilbur Colom. The petitioner’s side was presented by Hunter M. Gholson, in representation for Mississippi University for Women.
Case Brief Of Brandenburg V. Ohio
767 Words | 4 PagesIn contrast, The Supreme Court found Brandenburg innocent in the Brandenburg v. Ohio case. After threatening the U.S Government for suppressing the white race, Brandenburg advocated revengeance. His actions and words did not seem to present any specific danger towards the U.S Government because he was only defending the KKK’s position. For this reason, Brandenburg’s beliefs could not be persecuted by the Government and the Court named him not
Morse V. Frederick Case Summary
208 Words | 1 PagesThe issue was, “Should a principal restrict student speech at a public school event when that speech can reasonably be viewed as promoting illegal drug use?”, they said yes it’s conservative. Justice said that the 1st Amendment rights
Case Brief Griswold V. Connecticut
624 Words | 3 PagesGriswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) Facts: Two plaintiff, Griswold and Buxton, were the Executive and Medical Directors for Planned Parenthood League at Connecticut State respectively. They had been accused and later convicted and fined $100 each for violating the Connecticut Comstock Act of 1873. The Act illegalized any use of drugs, medical item, or any other appliance for the purposes of preventing conception. Griswold and Buxton had been found quilt of giving information, medical advices, and counselling to couples about family planning.
New York Times V Sullivan Summary
514 Words | 3 PagesAs New York Times v. Sullivan began in 1960 and continued through 1964, the South overflowed with racial tensions. Just one month before the Times published “Heed Their Rising Voices” in 1960, a student-sit-in at a Woolworth lunch counter sparked the sit-in movement that spread throughout the Deep South. Not long after that, the Freedom Riders boarded buses across the Southern States in ‘62 and faced violence from the Ku Klux Klan, which only provoked more protests. This situation attracted the attention of both the media and the Court. The “Heed Their Rising Voices” ad boldly summarized: “Again and again the Southern violators have answered Dr. King’s peaceful protests with intimida-tion and violence.”
Case Brief Of Loving V. Virginia
585 Words | 3 PagesLoving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) Facts of the case: In 1924, the state of Virginia passed the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 which banned the marriage between a white person and a person of color. The law only targeted interracial marriages that consisted of a white person and a non-white person. The act had additional provisions that penalized the travel out of state for purposes of marriage between a white person and person of color; upon return to Virginia, the marriage would be subject to Virginian law. The punishment for the marriage was one to five years incarceration, and the marriage would be void “without any judicial proceeding.” Aware of the Racial Integrity Act, Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, traveled
Summary Of Clements V State
1178 Words | 5 PagesOverview of Clements v. State The case of Clements v. State is an example of how the legal framework of stalking laws in Texas should be interpreted and the effectiveness of this law to ensure justice for the victims. The case depicts how the law should operate despite certain vagueness in aspects of the First Amendment. The decision of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas to uphold the conviction while disagreeing with some conclusions arrived at by the trial court proves that stalkers will not be allowed to slide through cracks in the legal system. The case, based on a sequence of events where the complainant, Jennifer Clements, was subject to psychological trauma accompanied by an imminent physical threat to her from Nathan Clement, her estranged husband, is a forthright condition of stalking which complies with the Statues of
United States Vs Eichman Essay
820 Words | 4 PagesJustice Paul Steven was the allocate for the dissenting opinion. Their main point was ¨it is now conceded that the Federal Government has a legitimate interest in protecting the symbolic value of the American flag,” (LII) and that “the flag uniquely symbolizes the ideas of liberty, equality, and tolerance -- ideas that Americans have passionately defended and debated throughout our history. The flag embodies the spirit of our national commitment to those ideals” (LII). People today still debate is the burning of the flag should be protected under the first amendment or if it is a symbol of American and therefore should not be
Westside Community Schools Case Study
660 Words | 3 PagesGisselle Zepeda Mr. Lievre American Government Credit 5 Board of Education of Westside Community Schools Versus Mergens The Equal Access Act upheld by the Supreme Court in Board of Education v. Mergens, 1990, requires public secondary schools to allow access to religiously based student groups on the same basis as other student clubs. The school administration denied a group of students their right to create a Christian after school club. The students intended for their club to have just the same privileges and club meetings as all other after school clubs. The schools excuse being that it lacked faculty support which led to the school and district being sued by the students.
The Pentagon Papers Case
337 Words | 2 PagesThis case highlighted the First Amendment condemning any limit on free speech. However, during the case proceeding, the Court had dissents for deciding when the government may restrict the First Amendment. The case spread the fact that
Why Do Phillips Faith And Integrity?
184 Words | 1 PagesWashington Post). The U.S Supreme Court took this “anti-religious bias” as
Abel Fields Essay
520 Words | 3 PagesThe government appealed the court of appeals decision to bring to the Supreme Court where it is now. I stand with full belief, and the majority opinion of the Supreme Court that Abel Fields’ conviction be overturned. His First Amendment rights had been violated. Even though he was
Supreme Court Case: Texas V. Johnson Case
150 Words | 1 PagesTexas v. Johnson (1989) was a Supreme court case deciding whether or not flag burning is supported by “symbolic speech” protected by the first amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson is caught burning the American flag in Dallas, Texas in 1989 to protest Ronald Reagan`s policies. When Johnson had burned the flag during the protest the state of Texas arrested him for desecrating a venerated object. Although Johnson did not hurt or threaten to hurt anyone witnesses and spectators claimed to be seriously offended by seeing Johnson burn the flag. Most of the people in the courtroom were sided with Gregory Johnson supporting the fact that flag burning is considered as symbolic speech which is protected by the first amendment.
Case Study: Dogs Of Velvet And Steel
619 Words | 3 PagesThe Third Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed with Stevens, which made 18 U.S.C. Section 48 unconstitutional and reversed Steven’s convictions. The court reasoning was that the dog-fighting videos that Stevens sold were protected speech and prohibiting the depictions of animal cruelty would create a new section of speech that is unprotected by the free speech provision of the Amendment under the law that was in question. In 2009 of April, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. The Supreme Court task was to conclude if prohibiting videos showing animal cruelty breaches the First Amendment.
More about Snyder V Phelps Summary
Mccreary County V. ACLU Case Study
1108 Words | 5 PagesMississippi University For Women Case Study
730 Words | 3 PagesCase Brief Of Brandenburg V. Ohio
767 Words | 4 PagesMorse V. Frederick Case Summary
208 Words | 1 PagesCase Brief Griswold V. Connecticut
624 Words | 3 PagesNew York Times V Sullivan Summary
514 Words | 3 PagesCase Brief Of Loving V. Virginia
585 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Clements V State
1178 Words | 5 PagesUnited States Vs Eichman Essay
820 Words | 4 PagesWestside Community Schools Case Study
660 Words | 3 PagesThe Pentagon Papers Case
337 Words | 2 PagesWhy Do Phillips Faith And Integrity?
184 Words | 1 PagesAbel Fields Essay
520 Words | 3 PagesSupreme Court Case: Texas V. Johnson Case
150 Words | 1 PagesCase Study: Dogs Of Velvet And Steel
619 Words | 3 Pages