ipl-logo

Socrates Ignorance Is Evil

433 Words2 Pages

Amongst the crowded market of a place where anything can happen, Socrates was hosting his traditional circle of students when someone ran past him saying, “Thomas Aquinas is here!” People began to lose their minds as the “greatest” theologian and philosopher in Church history decided to grace the marketplace streets with his presence. Socrates rolled his eyes with disgust and continued teaching his lesson, “Anyways, as I was saying, ignorance is evil.” His students nodded in agreement. A voice behind him, pretentious sounding in tone, said, “Pagan! How would you know anything of the true nature of evil? Evil is nothingness, an absence of our lord and savior, God.” Thomas Aquinas stopped walking. Clearly, Aquinas was not in the mood to …show more content…

I find that truth now, is that you’re too stubborn to accept the lord as your god. I also know that evil is the absence of god. Therefore, everyone that has an absence of god in their lives is evil.” “Or maybe you need to take into effect that not everyone has to believe what you say,” Socrates said, “many people are not part of your religion are not evil. I believe the ignorance born of people like you who are ignorant. Therefore, ignorance is evil.” Aquinas seemed shocked that someone could actually knock his theory down to nothing. At this point and time, everyone was laughing –silently to themselves– at Aquinas. Here, the Catholic Churches best and brightest was reduced to nothing more than your average high-horsed jerk. Embarrassed, Aquinas desperately tried to defend himself against that career-ending remark Socrates made. However, no amount of retorts or sass could bring him back to being taken seriously. Aquinas had failed miserably to do what he had set out to accomplish. Socrates had beat him into submission in a matter of moments, using only

Show More
Related

  • Bless Me Ultima Study Questions And Answers

    262 Words  | 2 Pages

    If “evil” cannot be understood simply, then similarly, its opposite --“good”-- cannot be comprehended plainly either. For that reason, it can be said that the

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Warren Flew Debate

    757 Words  | 4 Pages

    The debate was immense for several reasons, one of utmost importance is that it meets the assertion that Christianity can be reasoned logically and rationally. In this debate, Thomas Warren uses the same tools of logic and rationality employed by atheists and agnostics to respond to and defeat Anthony Flew

    Read More

  • Comparing Authority In Apology Of Socrates And Hebrew Bible

    1800 Words  | 8 Pages

    Socrates is not an atheist because he says that if he believes in divinities, then he believes there are gods (Apology 27d), he just believes in different Greek gods. Plus, Socrates is not forcing a new religion on young people, he takes the opportunity to talk to people willing to listen to him. It just happens to be young people that listen to Socrates rambling on about how wise people are not actually geniuses. He is not spreading the word about his gods. Unfortunately, the judges still think

    Read More

  • How Does Socrates Corrupt Youth

    1092 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the Greek literary work Apology written by Plato, Socrates was convicted for refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state, introducing new divinities and corrupting the youth. It is believed by many critics that Socrates knew he was going to be sentenced to death so, he was able to use his defense as an opportunity to clear his reputation, confront his accusers, but most significantly instruct the Athenians. He wanted them to look into themselves and seek virtue and wisdom before looking into personal interests. We notice throughout Socrates’ defense that there is a continued theme of wisdom and teaching towards the Athenians.

    Read More

  • Stereotypes Of Socrates Arguments In His Defense

    557 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another charge for Socrates is "Something of this sort: - That Socrates is a doer of evil, and corrupter of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the state and has other new divinities of his own. That is the sort of charge, and now let us examine the particular counts." Socrates refuted from the words of Maretus. He reminded Maretus of the fact that the so-called unbelieving accusations were only applicable to Anaxacola, and that it was absurd to say that a man who believed in a tragic god did not believe in God.

    Read More

  • Socrates Arguments In The Crito

    499 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crito accepts his arguments and Socrates decides he is going to

    Read More

  • Why Was Socrates Guilty

    1641 Words  | 7 Pages

    Not believing in Gods Socrates did not recognize the gods, which were generally accepted in Athens. As it is known, in the community of that time some traditions and regulations were formed, and if person did not compliance them, this person acts against society. The charge was formulated as follows: "Socrates breaks the law not recognizing the gods, which recognizes the city, but recognizing the believing in some new genius" (literally "new demon"). So if in Athens laws was also traditions, and tradition was to believe in generally accepted gods, not believing in gods Socrates was breaking the law.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Juxtaposition In Macbeth

    1456 Words  | 6 Pages

    Eli Sablan English 9HP Period 2 February 17, 2023 Shakespeare's Macbeth: The Disjointed Cosmos Our natural world, created by an intelligent and long-lived creature, is included in the cosmos, which is essentially the universe in harmony. When the universe's inhabitants follow natural law, the cosmos remains in equilibrium. According to Thomas Aquinas, when one acts in a way that benefits life, knowledge, society, and rational conduct, they are in unity with natural law; good is to be done, and evil avoided intentions, and their actions do not fulfill Aquinas's standards. The well-ordered cosmos chips away at wicked intents and subsequent actions that do not follow Thomas Aquinas's principles, such as murder for personal gain.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Aquinas Philosophy On Evil And The Free Will Of God

    1438 Words  | 6 Pages

    Despite this, because of reason and what God is envisioned to be, I agree with conclusions that Aquinas has made. Renick begins by asking the question “Why is there evil in the world?” The answer given by many Christians is that Satan is the reason evil exists since he corrupts God’s creation and history through Eden. Initially, I believed the same thing.

    Read More

  • Cultural Differences Between Good And Evil

    1242 Words  | 5 Pages

    Another Milestone that effects the way we define the notion of “Good and Evil” is largely based on our religion. Therefore, the way we see right from wrong, heaven and hell, light and darkness, Good vs. Evil and God and the Devil comes from the moral criterion that we attempt to apply to our worldviews. However, given the conspicuous contrasts amongst religions, ranging from Christianity to Islam to Judaism. Many people believe that due to the simple fact of religious diversity, this provides the basis to discredit any assumption of moral truths. Some religions define evil as “the result of human sin” or that “Evil is the result of a spiritual being who opposes the Lord God”

    Read More

  • Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis

    2349 Words  | 10 Pages

    The problem of evil takes into account three defining features of God: all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and questions whether such a God would permit evil and not interfere. Sinnott-Armstrong discusses his stance by countering responses he coins as the Glorious Response, the Modest Response, and the Overriding Response. Whereas, Craig counters the arguments made by Sinnott-Armstrong. The Glorious Response Thus response suggests evil is

    Read More

  • Analyzing Socrates Argument In Plato's Meno

    1060 Words  | 5 Pages

    The world we live in is filled with crime, evil, and injustice, but do people have the desire to do bad things knowing that they are bad, or do they do them thinking that they are good? In this essay, I examine Socrates argument, found in Plato’s Meno, that no one knowingly desires bad things. If Socrates were right, it would mean that it is impossible for someone to perform a bad action based on their desire for that bad thing. Instead, all bad desires result from the ignorance of the person performing the action in falsely believing that the action is good. Though Socrates presents a compelling argument, I argue that it is possible for someone to act badly, all the while knowing that what they desire is bad.

    Read More

  • Plato's Defense Of Corruption In The Apology By Socrates

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    New accusers say that Socrates corrupts the youth and does not believe in the gods of the State, and has new divinities of his own. To defend himself against these charges, Socrates asks Meletus some questions. As a result, Meletus is shown to be contradicting himself and making accusations that are absolutely absurd. To the question “Who are the improvers of the youth?” Meletus replies that they are all citizens, but not Socrates, arguing that he is only one who is corrupting them.

    Read More

  • Socrates: A Threat To The Athenian Society

    912 Words  | 4 Pages

    Making enemies and becoming the topic of conversation, the Athenians began to view Socrates as a threat to their beliefs and way of life and sought to end it. In order to end this, Socrates was accused of blasphemy (Mod1SlideC7). Socrates’s accusers took him to court and after Socrates did not play their game by asking to be sent into exile, and in the end, he was sentenced to death. After reading the textbook and Plato’s writing influenced by Socrates, I realized that in the period of his life Socrates was indeed truly a threat to the Athens society, because he looked for answers that no one else bothered to find which challenged their culture.

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas First Cause Argument Analysis

    1797 Words  | 8 Pages

    In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

    Read More

More about Socrates Ignorance Is Evil

Open Document