I have always been interested in sports and extracurricular. Sports are very popular in todayś society. Most people believe that sports affect people 's lives good and bad. Do you believe it affects more people or harms more people? Do you believe sports have a huge effect on kids today? Does it affect them in school? Why or why not? Everyone may have their own opinion on sports and extracurricular. I feel that schools should not cut sports and extracurricular. Although there are both pros and cons to this. This paper will explain if cutting sports and extracurricular from schools be a good idea and why or why not. History of Sports and Schools
The history of sports and schools may extend as far back as the beginning of military training. Team sports may have developed to train and prove the capability to fight and work together as a team. The history of sports can teach us about social changes, and how much society schools, sports and extracurricular have changed since then. Sports in the 1900ś haven´s changed too much. Different sports are played all over the world as hobbies, careers or as a part of fitness regimes. Some sports have grown to be more popular than others, attracting millions of fans. Baseball was a popular sport in the 1900ś. Baseball was quickly becoming the national past time. Baseball became more and more popular. People who couldn 't play always had the opportunity to watch. The national league was formed in 1876. Football had a large following,
The popularity itself helped out the game in more ways than one (Wolfe 1). The game itself started to change. Ballparks were built, sports pages had major headlines, and radios spoke of the game every day. Stadiums were originally built to be kept in the park no matter what, but now the stadiums were renovated to still be spacious, but could also be hit out. These stadiums made the games more fun, especially this certain game in particular.
Amanda Ripley, the author of “The Case Against High-School Sports”, made many good points that can create much controversy when it comes to high-school sports, due to the cost and the academic problems it may be creating amongst the students. She interviewed many people who have experiences banning high-school in order to save money for their school district and the school itself. Ripley wants to bring into attention all the money that is used on high-school sports when districts tend to use a minimal amount on academics. I have come to an agreement with her point-of-views due to several reasons: sports are the main focus of any high-school that may have sports, the tax money being provided to the school district has been used on sports than
Have high school sports teams brought a negative effect on American School’s education? In the Article “The Case against High School Sports", published by the Atlantic, Amanda Ripley argues the negative effects of high-school sports on a student’s education in America. Also she discusses how today's society make people think that high school sports is more of a necessity to students than getting a good education. However, Amanda fails to persuade the general audience because she used an excess of unneeded interviews by foreign exchange students and had failed to tear down the counterargument that sports teach discipline and social skills, which resulted in the audience feeling unchanged about their opinions toward the subject.
When the 1920’s were coming around the bend, many phenomenons started thriving to life, such as organized crime, the fashion industry, and construction of automobiles. Sports was one of these events to occur in the midst of this time period. During the 1920s there was a change taking place, regarding sports. Baseball, one of the oldest of sports, has always been a long time favorite for Americans, despite the dangers of the sport and the 1919 World Series scandal.
The late 1800’s was a time of mass progression for the United States. The west and east coast were finally connected through the completion of the railroad, making businesses and travel spread throughout the nation. Large corporations formed, the age of steel came about -- making cities more compact and vertical like the modern day, and there was a class breakdown economically making once lower-class individuals have a say in the market, forming the middle class. With all this new growth added to the economy, people finally could have leisure money to spend and some businessmen took notice and tried something that would later change the way Americans and soon the world consumed sports. If we look at the year 1859 we can see the pioneers of the professional baseball.
According to " The Case Against High-School Sports" (2013), sports could create some study, health, and time management problems for schools and students. In this post, Amanda Ripley initially shows the benefits when involving in the high-school sports: exercise, sportsmanship lessons, some positive personalities, more fun and staying away from vices. She also writes some tales to inform readers that in the US, students are interested and enjoy in sports more than other peers in other countries. However, she claims that the high-school sports have negative effects on schools and students. Next, she gave some schools ' examples to show the problems when schools and students spent too much time and money in high-school sports.
In this community lately, there has been discussion lately on sports possibly being removed from the high schools. Although, they get the most recognition that does not mean that just because one little thing it gets removed and completely forgotten about. In fact, so many people do high school sports in the text “Are High School Sports Good For Kids” it explicitly states “Here in Michigan almost 300,000 young people take part in high school sports every year.” This scene particularly shows that many youth athletes participate in high school sports in only one state alone.
Many school’s require a C average to even participate. So, without sports would those kids who only keep grades up for sports, fall? Or would American kids realize the importance of education instead of sports and put in more effort? Kolbert discusses the distraction side of sports involvement in school and the different views of academics and sports to parents. Although sports offer a number of life skills, it can take away from student study time.
This notion is supported by Dr. Daniel Gould, who believes that “Children who participate in sports have increased educational aspirations, closer ties to school and increased occupational aspirations in youth” (1). People against the funding of high school sports think that parents and society are placing more emphasis than ever before and, “[P]ressures athletic personnel to deviate on winning from the athlete- centered educational and personal development mission” (Gould 1). However, athletes strive to do better in class. Michael Lorenc, a high school basketball coach believes that “those who seem to have an overwhelming schedule where they’re playing maybe multiple sports, and high academic schedules, they tend to do better than those who don’t do anything extracurricularly” (Gray). Balancing sports and school makes athletes put more effort into keeping up grades while playing the sport they love.
“Not far from one quarter of the entire national income of America is expended for play and recreation” (1920s Sports”). During the 1920s, many people had enough money to spend on entertainment and a lot of people spent the money on sports. In the 1920s, there was many sports including boxing, baseball and football.
With the rise of spectator sports, one sport had the greatest impact of all, and it was baseball. Baseball is a sport that has been recognized in American culture for years. As society evolved, the interest in professional baseball has increased, and participating in it was common amongst Americans. Gambling was also amplifying during the era of World War 1, and deteriorated during the Post War Era.
Amanda Ripley argues in her article, The Case Against High-School Sports, that American high-schools should concentrate less on sports and more on education. One of the main points of the article compares the academic success of American high-schools to that of high-schools in other countries. The other main point of the article compares the academic success of American high-schools affiliated with sports to those that are not. The results of the two studies are both shocking and expected at the same time. America is one of the most affluent and demographically developed countries in the world.
The Director of the Institute for the Study of Youth Sports,Daniel Gould in his Article, “Are High School Sports Good For Kids” suggests that high school sports are an integral part of American society. He supports this claim by first saying how sports have educational benefits, then talking about their effect on the child as a citizen, and finally claiming that sports give adolescents increased aspirations. Goulds purpose is to illustrate the benefits of children taking part in school sports. He adopts a analytical tone an older audience.
If you have ever been in sports or school athletics, act fast! Schools are getting rid of their sports and we need to stop it. “Being a student is harder than ever. You are being held to tougher academic standards-and so is your school.
Sports can enhance the cooperative and strategic strategies. The passage states that, “understanding the competitive process entails an appreciation of the social nature of competition, particularly with regard to the cooperative and strategic aspects of sports and an awareness of the nature of individual roles within a cooperating group.” The last reason, which it the academic benefits, proves that you shouldn’t take away the sports for school. The kids that play sports benefit in the classroom a lot more than regular students.