Harmful effects
The Internet has in the pursuit of information. Web engines like Google; allow us to discover data that we are looking for and in this way picking up immediate knowledge information on topic. However, as of late there have been a few individuals who trust web engines like Google are doing the opposite and rather are making us "crazy", they trust that the Internet is replacing knowledge with data, and examination with productivity. Such Nicholas Carr a sponsor for The Atlantic. Nicholas Carr composed an article for The Atlantic titled "Is Google Making Us Stupid". In his article Carr makes a dispute that reading online is less arouse then perusing books. In this paper I will concentrate on the different clams that Carr uses
…show more content…
To support his claim he uses Scott Karp who admits to have stopped reading books all together. Karp says that his reason for reading online is “I’m just seeking convenience.” Carr argues that we read online because we feel the need to be efficient and that instead of reading with “skim” an article. Carr uses Wolf once more to support this claim, Wolf believes that when we read online we put emphasis on “efficiency” and “immediacy” she says this change in our values prevents us from forming deep thoughts and from forming literacy connections. Carr says that these values also affect “old media” such as television shows and newspapers because they like, online reading have to find more “efficient” ways to deliver information. One editor for the New York Times says that in order to conform to the new values they changed some pages to just include headlines instead of articles because of the “less efficient method of actually turning the pages and reading the articles.” Carr supports his claim that we will become information gatherers rather than knowledge gatherers by including an interview with Google’s founders in which they state that something optimal would happen “if you had all the world’s information directly attached to your brain, or an artificial brain that was smarter than your brain, you’d be better off.” Carr uses this in an effort to make us believe that when we use the Internet we don’t learn but instead we just accumulate
Every day new technology is advancing to makes its way into the world where it is used more efficiently. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,”, Nicholas Carr claims that human are no longer able to focus on longer texts due to the rise of digital texts. Nicholas Carr includes strong evidences to support his statement; and through the usage of ethos and pathos, he is able to convince his readers that “the Net is becoming a universal medium” (Carr). Examples of Ethos are evident throughout the article making Carr’s argument deductively valid. Nicholas Carr is known for his reputation as someone who has written influential pieces and earning many awards for his accomplishments.
In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, the author, Nicholas Carr, is arguing against the effect of our increased access to information. He is unsettled by the common idea that we’d all “be better off” if our brains were supplemented, or even replaced, by an artificial intelligence. Carr describes how am immediate access to a rich store of information from the Net has shaped his process of thought by reducing his capacity for concentration and contemplation. He is worried that placing efficiency and immediacy above all else is weakening our capacity to make rich mental connections that form when we read deeply without distraction. Carr uses an anecdote of the printing press to demonstrate how equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts.
Summary One Nicholas Carr in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” states that the internet is causing deficiencies in reading and has caused people to have brief attention spans while reading a book. Carr immediately goes into explanation on how he can no longer sit to read without becoming “fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do.” Carr then uses the rhetorical device of ethos by using creditable sources to back his claim. He uses a claim from scholars at University College London that stated, “It is clear that users are not reading online in traditional sense,” therefore stating people are skimming and scanning for information.
Writer, Nicolas Carr, in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, expresses the search engine Google is effecting the human mind. Carr’s purpose is to covey his idea that the web changes the way humans think. He creates a pessimistic tone to his audience that spending a lot of time on the internet is bad for the mind. I don’t believe Carr made an effective argument on this article because of the tone he used, the references he provided, and how the article was laid out. Carr begins his article to the readers by acknowledging the web is messing with his brain and he is not thinking the way he used to.
In Nicholas Carr's article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” the author argues that the Internet has become a new form of acquiring knowledge in people’s lives. Additionally, the author supports his own statement by demonstrating that within just a few clicks, one can instantly gain any information or article online without the need to visit and search a physical library. However, even though the Internet ameliorates the quality and quantity of resources to gain knowledge, he believes that as the source of knowledge is replaced by a convenient web page, society becomes easily distracted. In Clive Thompson's article, “Smarter Than You Think.
Rhetorical Analysis In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that the internet is taking over society and our thinking process. Google is affecting our abilities to read books, longer articles, and even older writings. Carr believes that we have become so accustomed to the ways of the internet, and we are relying on Google 's ability to sort through the details for us so we don 't have to, in order to get the information we find necessary more efficiently. He finds that this process has become almost too handy, and that it is corrupting us from becoming better educated.
Nicholas Carr’s essay, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?” on the other hand is a very different approach to language, more specifically about the language used in relation to technology. Carr begins this essay with a personal observation that he is losing his ability to read for long periods of time. He claims that the internet is to blame for deterioration of attention people now experience when reading. This is because people are developing a new way of reading in which Freidman refers to as “skimming”(Carr) that allowing them to hastily read things without actually taking in the semantic meaning.
The focus of my essay is Nicolas Carr's article "Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet is doing to Our Brains". In this paper Nicolas Carr talks of how people have been made lazy by the Internet with its readily available information; everything is at our fingertips and we no longer have to work for any information. And he talks about how people have become stupid by not needing to learn anything as the internet has it all there for us
As we look all around us, we begin to become aware of the many different technologies that are in the world today. The different technologies started not very long ago, however they have advanced very quickly to please the new generations. The older generation that has grown up without technology is having to quickly adjust to the new world. The technologies could be shaping our minds in ways that we are not aware of or in ways that we don't take the time to actually think about. As technology is changing and evolving for the worst, so are our minds.
The internet, in short, is our everyday savior when in distress. Technology is a need in the 21st century. It is our main source of communication, socializing, learning and many others. However, according to Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, published in the July/August 2008 issue of the Atlantic, the internet is reprogramming his memory, and remapping his neural circuitry. Despite using logos intensely and multiple rhetorical approaches in convincing the reader of his point of view, Carr fails to make a logical, persuading argument for multiple reasons.
Although the Internet and its knowledge is a very helpful tool and that it is very integrated in our lives, it is also a dangerous to as well affecting our brains and they way we learn, and
1. Nicholas Carr’s argument in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” challenges Thompson’s argument which was that the internet is making people smarter by helping people improve their writing skills when they read other people’s work online. However, Carr believes with so much information available, the internet had changed our “mental habits” in a negative way. The internet has people using “ a form of skimming activity” which decreases how much people read to “no more than one or two pages of an article or book” (Carr 2) before they change to different site. Carr complicates Boyd’s view on how algorithms are filtering what people see on their screen and those who are not digitally literate would be clueless of this.
In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid? ” , Nicholas Carr talks about how the internet has affected the way most people process the information that they could found online. The title of the article is the most obvious clue for the argument that he is trying to make. He also points out how internet is our primary source to find the information that we are looking for, but the side effect is affecting our basic ability to read long pieces of information such as books. Google is a well-known website that allows to anyone instant access to kind of information, which can be really helpful if the user knows how to use and manipulate it.
The rise of the technological age has brought to pass the downfall of mindful and comprehensive reading. At least this is what Nicholas Carr believes, as stated in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”. He argues that because of the golden age of computers, in depth reading no longer occurs to the extent that it once did. According to Carr, people now simply skim and skip over articles instead of actually reading them in depth. Carr constructs his credibility by having a prestigious background, and citing academic sources.
In Nicholas Carr, Is google making us stupid, He emphasizes on many points,the main point being , how before the creation of the internet people had to spend hours and hours in the libraries looking for the right articles, but now with the creation of the internet things can get done faster and more efficiently. He also he argues that before the creation of the Internet people that loved to read and that had degrees related to reading found themselves less into reading when computers started to make an uprising. He also argues that the internet is being a primary source and now and it’s affecting our reading habits and demolishing our brains. In Clive Thompson, Smarter than you think, He’s trying to convince his readers that the internet