In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Martin Luther King Jr responds to his fellow clergymen criticism by arguing that all people have a moral obligation to fight injustice. He educates people about the racial tension and injustice in Birmingham to show that racism has influenced the rest of the United States. King also differentiates between just and unjust laws in order to justify civil disobedience and having to break the state’s law when necessary. He states that African Americans can no longer wait for justice but they must band together to argue for their rights in nonviolent way. King writes this letter to defend civil disobedience so that the racial injustice that African Americans have been enduring can come to an end. King wants …show more content…
His definition of a just law is that the man made law should agree with God’s law while an unjust law is defined as one that contrasts against God’s law. To King, a law should not degrade an individual by making them a minority along with not having to make a distinction between groups of people. He goes into this as he wants to explain that his actions of breaking the law and defend civil disobedience as justifiable in his case. He gives an example of when civil disobedience is reasonable by bringing up what was going on in Germany under Hitler. He states, “We can never forget that everything that Hitler did in Germany was “legal” and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was illegal” (Par.18). During Hitler’s regime there were many unjust laws as the Nazi’s laws made the Jews a minority group that needed to be killed off. That is an unjust law and these laws were followed but that didn’t mean that they’re moral and therefore he considered it to be a moral obligation to ignore these laws and the same applies to the U.S. during the period of racial injustice. The U.S needs to realize how both these situations show that their laws are unjust and by bringing up this comparison, the people can understand the wrong of the laws and would therefore argue for change. Civil disobedience that occurred in Germany during that time was justifiable and so it can also be …show more content…
He goes on to point out that the government has been telling them to wait but he translates that to them saying that they will never get their rights. The promise set by the constitution that everybody should have rights has not been kept and that was three hundred and forty years ago which has been way too long and change needs to happen immediately. Although the Emancipation Proclamation got rid of slavery that hasn’t changed the way African Americans have been viewed as they still face racial inequality. He acknowledges that through this quote, “The nations of Asia and Africa are moving with jetlike speed toward the goal of political independence, and we still creep at horse-and-buggy pace toward the gaining of a cup of coffee at a lunch counter” (Par.12). This metaphor emphasizes his point of how long African Americans have waited and how the government seems to be neglecting the fact that they need to change. It can be ironic how those two nations which aren’t as successful as the U.S.when it comes to the economy or their lifestyle can be more successful when it comes to the basic freedom of the people. African Americans need to take action and have the U.S go at the same pace as Asia and Africa to get to their goal of being free. America is a place that represents freedom and yet these racial problems have remained for
In Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter From Birmingham Jail", I agree with his defense of his protests against segregation. King wrote this letter to respond to eight white southern religious leader’s statement that called his protests "unwise and untimely". Slavery had been abolished almost 100 years before, but African-Americans were still being treated as lesser beings. There was never going to be a right time for some to make people of color equal. Martin Luther King Jr. was and still is considered the biggest influence in the civil rights movement.
Others might say all leaders are rebels because they perform illegal actions to get what they want. For example, King, Martin Luther Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail, states, “But I am sure that if I had lived in Germany during this time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal.” This means Mr.King would’ve helped unexplored Jews in Hitler 's Germany even if it meant going against the law. This shows Mr.King, a leader representing rebellion as he states he wouldn 't have a problem braking authority. Nevertheless not all leaders are rebels.
In his 1963 “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” Dr. Martin Luther King Junior essentially states that “Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than misunderstanding from people of ill will.” This quote by Dr. King is extremely true, and relative to anyone. His quote’s understanding is hard for anyone to see on the surface, but after taking a while to realize its meaning, it makes sense why the quote is considered famous. Understanding the quote begins with breaking down the entire sentence. “Shallow understanding…” represents the basic knowledge, or foundation that people teach to one another.
“Why We Can’t Wait” by Martin Luther King, Jr. explains the vital Birmingham campaign and features the inconceivable Letter from Birmingham Jail. Despite the fact of always positive in tone, it deals with the absoluteness of a campaign that is now viewed as pivotal to the success of the American Civil Rights Movement but was anything but assured in its own time. That King acknowledges this reality while placing it in a constructive context all the while advancing his affirmative, forward-looking message is a confirmation to his vision and incredibly magnanimous perseverance. On April 16, 1963, as the violent events of the Birmingham movement unraveled in the city, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., composed a letter from his prison cell in return to local clerical leaders’ criticism of the campaign.
Additionally, King's encounter with a prejudiced judicial system is a potent example of the discrimination African Americans encounter in the struggle of basic human rights. As he notes in his personal experience, "For instance, I was arrested Friday on a charge of parading without a permit. Now, there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust" (King 3). This statement emphasizes the injustice and unfairness of the situation and evokes a strong emotional response from the reader. While King acknowledges that obtaining a permit for a parade is not inherently unfair, he emphasizes that it
In A Call For Unity, the clergymen refer to the movement as unwise and untimely, as well as showing concern for the demonstrators’ willingness to break the law. King addresses this, stating that “YOU express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, it is rather strange and paradoxical to find us consciously breaking laws” (King, 3). Calling back to a Supreme Court decision that at that point was nine years old really counters the clergymen’s claims of the movement being untimely and unwise, instead proving that they are logically justified in their protesting, and that they were breaking no laws.
“The purpose of our direct-action program is to create a situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation” (166). The second criticism King accosts relating to the “unwise” nature of his protests, is one about the dedication he has to them. People viewed him breaking some laws and advocating to obey others as paradoxical. He simply points out that there are two types of laws, just and unjust, and just as it’s one’s moral duty to obey a just law, it is similarly one’s moral duty to disobey an unjust law. King uses several paragraphs to define what differentiates the two, but the major ideas are as follows.
He then refers to his earlier statement about the apathy of the clergymen regarding the reason for the demonstrations, alluding to their anxiety over the protesters willingness to break the law. However, he brings up a dichotomy: the laxness and rigidity in which different laws are enforced. Namely, he sarcastically refers to the apprehensive enforcement of the 1954 Supreme Court decision outlawing segregation. Well, why are only some laws enforced? King answers this question by stating that there are two kinds of laws: just and unjust.
Response to “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. In Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, he responded to statements written in a Birmingham newspaper that criticized his actions in the city. He undermined these disapprovals by explaining his belief in nonviolent direct action. King also went on to give opinions on other topics, such as, the lack of support from white moderates and white churches. He used technique and structure to develop his ideas and justify his methods.
In paragraph 9 King states “there are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws (6),” and then continues with King stating “Now, what is the difference between the two? (7)” What is the difference between an unjust law and a just law? King goes on to explain that a just law is one that “squares with the moral
Martin Luther King Jr., in his essay “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” writes that, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” The evidence to support this assertion is not limited to King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail, but can also be found in Henry David Thoreau’s essay, “Resistance to Civil Government,” and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. In “Resistance to Civil Government,” Thoreau writes that under a government in which the majority rule, the conscience of its subjects becomes atrophied. He emphasizes this point by juxtaposing men and machine, as well as life and death. King, in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” identifies compliance with an unjust government as the cause of loss of conscience.
(Paragraph 4). This drew the clergymen’s attention to King’s beliefs and possibly made them realize the flaws in the system. King also states, “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law…” (Paragraph 5).
King makes the point that a law is just if it follows the Law of God and Unjust if it doesn’t. King goes on further to explain a just law is a law that a “power majority group” wants a minority group to follow and is willing to follow the same law itself. On the other end of the spectrum an unjust law would be if the Majority group isn’t willing to follow the same law they are requiring a minority group to follow. With all of Kings bashing of laws in the letter King takes a step back to clarify that he doesn’t want everyone to go out and break the law, he says this would lead to anarchy. He also says “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty.”
In 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. led a peaceful movement in Birmingham, Alabama. The purpose of the demonstration was to bring awareness and end to racial disparity in Birmingham. Later that night, King and his followers were detained by city authorities. While in custody, King wrote the famous “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” This letter voiced out his disappointment in the criticisms, and oppositions that the general public and clergy peers obtained.
King believed that if he could just go to Birmingham, and protest non-violently, that he could make a difference. On April 16, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. was imprisoned, in Birmingham, for protesting the civil rights of Black Americans. While in jail, he began writing a letter addressing the clergymen. His main audience in writing this letter was to the eight clergymen who criticized his actions and also the majority of the population as well. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail”, argues that injustice