How can we see, both in Cicero and SPQR, evidence of Mary Beard's conclusion that "the Empire created the Emperors”, not the other way around? Beard begins by narrating Cicero’s prosecution of Verres, setting the stage for the question of what Rome had become. It was still a Republic, but one that was very unwieldy to govern due to its size and Rome’s political structure. Beard argues that the difficulties Rome had in governing and policing such a large territory led to the rise of the Emperors and the ruin of the Republic. The vast expanse of the empire led to virtual autonomy on the part of generals and governors; autonomy that was often abused as Cicero’s prosecution demonstrates. Even a conscientious governor like Cicero had to deal with “endemic, chronic, low-level …show more content…
To combat corruption, the Romans passed sophisticated laws to allow for redress and prosecution; Cicero’s prosecution occurred under laws passed by Gaius Gracchus. Another Gracchian reform dealt with Senate misconduct; the equites were originally empowered to be the jury for senators, but this led to additional problems and conflicts of interest. Despite anti-corruption laws, unscrupulousness was still common as there were extremely few administrators or civil service officials. The lack of competent administrators was especially evident in Cicilia; Caelis chided Cicero for expecting help: “‘a man holding public office is expected to cope with any emergency, as though every item in complete preparedness had been put at his disposal’” (Cicero, 193). With no civil service, most functions (like tax collection) were contracted out with little to no oversight and Roman officials saw provincial appointments
Tiberius Gracchus was a tribune who lived in Rome in the early-mid 1st century BC. Frank Herbert, an American author commented that “The stakes in conflict do not change. Battle determines who will control the wealth or its equivalent”. The actions of Tiberius Gracchus do support the statement by Herbert as the direct challenge to the authority of the Senate he made provoked the Senate to act in an extreme way to maintain power. Tiberius Gracchus was motivated by the people and his position to introduce the reforms and by doing this he threatens the peace in the Roman society.
Unlike, the Roman elite dominating society with
Beginning with the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor, the effects of World War II on Japanese-Americans (albeit, not limited to Japanese-Americans) in the United States motivated further racial divisions between the “foreign” and the “true American.” Probably the most significant sign of changing social and racial relationships between Japanese-Americans and Caucasian Americans was President Franklin D. Roosevelt's signature of Executive Order 9066. This policy made legal the forced removal of Japanese-Americans, forcing them to relocate to Internment Camps, while abandoning their homes, businesses, and sometimes even families. Some “resident enemy aliens” were detained and transferred to Justice Camps for questioning as suspects of sabotage and espionage, as depicted by the character of the father in Julie Otsuka’s, When the Emperor was Divine.
In Julie Otsuka’s novel, When the Emperor was Divine, a nameless Japanese-American family is uprooted, exported, and abandoned by their own government. The family, along with thousands of others, lived in an internment camp for the duration of World War II, their only crime being their Japanese heritage. All Americans should know the story well, however, beyond public knowledge, there is a hidden history of Japanese-American imprisonment that extends beyond the less malicious internment of families. It is kept in the dark, easily overlooked, only found when one is willing to search.
Discrimination is a powerful word that can describe how many Japanese Americans felt in the 1940s. The book When the Emperor Was Divine by Julie Otsuka is a story about a Japanese American family whose father gets taken in the night by the police. It is a story about how the family's mother, daughter, and son navigate the Japanese internment camps. Being confined, constrained, isolated, and having their freedom taken away when they are transported to an internment camp are common elements of this family's experiences after the bombing of Pearl Harbor and can be seen on pages 45 and 46.
Augustus’ government was predominantly influenced by his relationship and reorganisation of the senate past 23 BC’s settlement. Augustus’ aim was to move the senate and magistrates from being chief organs of the state to being subordinate entities at Augustus’ disposal. Augustus’ relationship with the senate and magistrates was governed through his dominant aim to discretely consolidate his authoritative position. Augustus reorganisations of political roles and magistrates, as shown through his organisation of consuls, questors and praetors. Ultimately, Augustus’ auctoritas over the senate highlighted how tactically Augustus consolidated his position through discretion.
Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, better known as the ‘Gracchi Brothers’ were a pair of tribunes descending from the plebs from the 2nd century BCE who sought to introduce land reforms and other legislations that aligned with their populist views/ideas. It can be said that the career of the two brothers was marked by murder, riots and outright manipulation of the power they were granted which completely altered the state of Roman politics- aiding in the breakdown of the Roman Republic. The legislation they sought to pass essentially redistributed major aristocratic land ownership among the commoners such as the urban poor and veterans. After achieving little success during the early stages of the reforms, both were assassinated by enemy parties.
Cicero also knew that the quality of our lives was fully reliant on the quality of our government. Which supports his doubtfulness of a popular government, that is over-ruling on the people in the community. Cicero also favored term limits so that no one person was in charge for a substantial long period of time. He feared that with a dominant ruler, that they may become over bearing, taking advantage of the system to benefit themselves rather than the people within the community. Cicero had many ideas that are commonly found in governments all over the globe.
and they didn 't want to join the military. So Rome had 2 options, either have a small military or an army full of mercenaries. A mercenary is a paid soldier.
We recognize in the construction of the work „ Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire“, that Edward Gibbon, in the first works a total period of 460 years. He begins in 180 AD and ends in 641 AD. Here we see, that the author is largely concerned on the time especially during and after the fall of Rome. In the chapters four to seven he deals with the successors of Marcus Antoninus, namely Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander and
Weng and Harsfield Mrs. Weishaar ELA 1 May 16th, 2023 The Horrors of the WWII Japanese American Internment camps Japanese internment camps were a dark time in US history, many people have forgotten the troubles that Japanese Americans had faced during this troubled time. When the Emperor Was Divine is a book published by Julie Otsuka, a Japanese-American writer, which discusses the events leading up to and after the incarceration of the Japanese within America in WWII. The Japanese Americans were wrongfully taken out of their homes without any evidence of wrongdoing and were imprisoned due to prejudice and not necessity. Otsuka portrayed in the book that Inside these incarceration camps the conditions were unsuitable for human life, and
They abused an oath known as sacrosanctitas, or the right of tribunes to not be physically harmed, to take control of Rome. With this oath in place, Tiberius bypassed the Senate and instead used the Plebian Assembly to issue land and farms to those without them. Both brothers ignored the tradition of tribunes being only elected once by announcing they will run for the next election, resulting in Tiberius being killed by angry senators. When Gaius tried to instate new courts to put senators on trial for political corruption, the senators advised the consuls to defend the republic by killing him. This ultimately resulted in two factions being created, the “supporters of the people” in the populares faction, or supporters of the “best” whom belonged to the optimates
The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion
In her chapter on the historiography of Roman exemplarity, Christina Shuttleworth Kraus examines this loss of power through the transition of exempla as the res gestae populi Romani to the res gestae divi Augusti (Kraus, 2). In early Roman history, exemplarity rested in the hands of popular consciousness; the citizens of Rome had the sole power of deciding which events or people to raise up to the status of exempla. This system of exemplarity that is explained in detail by Matthew Roller’s four stage model of the creation of exempla by public discourse (Roller, 216-217). However, Roller’s framework begins to collapse when Augustus intentionally influences exemplary power through his coercive Res Gestae. Rather than looking to the past for the great deeds of common people like the Sabine women or Lucretia, Roman citizens of the Augustan period had their attention directed towards the persona of one man, an exemplar in the form of an emperor.
The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.