Sweat By Zora Neale Hurston: A Comparative Analysis

480 Words2 Pages

"Sweat" by Zora Neale Hurston and "Why Women Always Take Advantage of Men" by Zora Neale Hurston are two distinct stories that display the author's writing style and literary devices. Both stories are written in the first-person narrative, which provides the reader with an intimate insight into the characters' thoughts and emotions. However, the language used in each story is different. "Sweat" is written in a dialect that reflects the language spoken by the African American characters in the story, while "Why Women Always Take Advantage of Men" is written in a more standard English language, reflecting the author's education and training.

The perspective in both stories is also different. In "Sweat," the protagonist, Delia, is portrayed as a victim of her abusive husband, who uses physical and emotional violence …show more content…

"Sweat" follows the traditional story structure, with a beginning, middle and end, allowing the reader to follow the characters' journey. In contrast, "Why Women Always Take Advantage of Men" is structured in a more analytical manner, with the author providing evidence and arguments to support her thesis.Throughout both stories, the author uses literary devices to create effects and convey ideas. For example, in "Sweat," the author uses metaphor to describe Delia's situation, such as when she says "the sun beats down on her like a lash." This metaphor conveys the emotional and physical pain Delia experiences, and helps the reader understand the severity of her situation. In "Why Women Always Take Advantage of Men," the author uses irony to challenge societal norms and conventions. For example, when the author says "men always make more money than women," she is using irony to highlight the gender pay gap, and the unequal distribution of power between men and

Open Document