Historical Criticism In Sweat By Zora Neale Hurston

1187 Words5 Pages
Historical criticism strives to cognize a literary work by examining the social, cultural, and intellectual context that essentially includes the artist’s biography and milieu. Historical critics are more concerned with guiding readers through the use of identical connotation rather than analyzing the work’s literary significance. (Brizee and Tompkins). The journey of a historical reading begins with the assessment of how the meaning of a text has altered over time. In many cases, when the historical context of a text is not fully comprehended, the work literature cannot be accurately interpreted. For example, three literary works that entail the reader to better understanding the historical context are: “Sweat” by Zora Neale Hurston, “London” by William Blake, and “For My Daughter” by Weldon Kees.…show more content…
The social issues that occurred during this time period are of many. When reading the poem “For My Daughter” by Weldon Kees, readers learn a lot by considering the year the poem was written in, 1940, and the nationality of its author, American. In 1940, World War II was in progress and the United States was still recovering from the Great Depression. In William Blake’s poem “London,” particular words had different meaning than they do today. During the eighteenth century, readers could make probable associations with the characters in the play. A simple historical analysis of a text can lead to a better comprehension of the text itself. Historical critics help the readers of today better comprehend

    More about Historical Criticism In Sweat By Zora Neale Hurston

      Open Document