The story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut describes a futuristic world where anyone who is even remotely considered to have a slight advantage over others is immediately suppressed. This is done so everyone can be equal and those who are more intelligent, athletic, etc. don’t gain an advantage over others. This can all be seen through the characters such as George, Hazel, Harrison, and Diana Moon Glampers, the point of view of the story is set in, and through the symbolism which all add up to create a theme of equality through government oppression. When examining the theme of the story, the characters play a pivotal role in enforcing the theme since all the characters are static characters and their role as protagonist shows how the …show more content…
In this scene the way the two are described and how their actions give great symbolism showing that they broke out of the equality for all law and become above everyone else. This type of symbolism can be seen when Harrison labels him and the ballerina as emperor and empress. According to the text, it states "I am the Emperor!" cried Harrison...I shall now select my Empress!" he said... She was blindingly beautiful...Not only were the laws of the land abandoned, but the law of gravity and the laws of motion as well...It became their obvious intention to kiss the ceiling. They kissed it. And then, neutralizing gravity with love and pure will, they remained suspended in air inches below the ceiling, and they kissed each other for a long, long time” (citation). This quote represents the symbolic meaning of inequality. When they explain how the woman was stunning, the labels of Emperor and Empress or the fact they leaped into the air defying the law of land and physics it's abundantly clear that these two are no equals to everyone else. These two have risen above everyone else as a symbol that forced equality only ends potential growth. However, this symbolism won’t last long since a new form of symbolism is found when Diana Moon Clampers enters. According to the text it states “It was then that Diana Moon Clampers, the Handicapper General, came into the studio with a double-barreled ten-gauge shotgun. She fired twice, and the Emperor and the Empress were dead before they hit the floor. Diana Moon Clampers loaded the gun again. She aimed it at the musicians and told them they had ten seconds to get their handicaps back on” (citation). What this symbolism does is it counteracts the previous symbolism which defied a crucial part of the theme, equality. Diana Moon acts as the counterbalance to this and fulfills the other
In both 2081 and Harrison Bergeron, symbolism can be found nearly everywhere. However, one particular form was more present than many others. In the short story and the movie, viewers can clearly observe the Acts of Vampires symbolism (How to Read Literature Like a Professor - pg 15). To begin, there was a man-made monster present in both interpretations of Harrison Bergeron's story.
I myself was kind of taken aback by this at first as well. It seems to say that the only power we have as women is our bodies and sex. But after thinking critically about the movie and reading what Spike Lee himself had to say about the movie I realize that it is only, metaphor for the true power that women hold. Not only this but it calls attention to the oversexualized images of women and make the viewer aghast at the idea that a sex strike might actually work in today’s society.
In his short story Harrison Bergeron, Kurt Vonnegut uses an astounding amount of powerful imagery and diction to create the perfect scenes of the dystopian reality he creates. Throughout his use of imagery, Vonnegut creates scenes palpably imagined by readers. He uses underlying humor to lighten scenes of the morbid and macabre nature of the future where being different can be a death sentence. The future that is created in totality by Vonnegut is a dire scene created to be filled with a pastiche of people strung with handicaps to make them to be exactly the same as the “perfectly average citizen.” Vonnegut’s tone throughout is both dreary towards the bizarre and twisted dystopia that makes everyone equal, but is also somewhat insulting to those who do not bear handicaps due to being lacking both mentally and physically.
Equality is a great idea that we should strive for and achieve; however, being made equal physically and mentally by the government could be very unfair. People should still have characteristics that make us different. One can be diverse but still equal to his neighbor. Kurt Vonnegut Jr.’s use of point of view, conflict, and imagery in his short story “Harrison Bergeron,” illustrates how difficult living in a world where everyone is the same would be.
One common afternoon in the year of 2081, when everyone was equal, Hazel and George Bergeron were in their lovely living room watching television. Suddenly, a news reporter with a severe speech impediment came on. After trying many times to say, “Good morning ladies and gentlemen,” he handed it off to a ballerina who read, “Harrison Bergeron, age 14, has just escaped from jail, where he was held on suspicion of plotting to overthrow the government. He is a genius and an athlete, is under-handicapped, and should be regarded as extremely dangerous.” However, in this short story “Harrison Bergeron”, Kurt Vonnegut uses irony, shift and mood, and allusion to illustrated haw society would be if everyone was under the law of equality.
Through this use of dramatic irony, the novel evokes strong emotions of readers which compels them to further read the book. Secondly, the dramatic irony of knowing Shiori’s true status of being a princess puts emphasis on the theme during the interactions between other characters. This is prominent in an example where Shiori as a princess often “cajol[ed] the palace chef for his red bean paste recipe” (Lim 3) versus when she turned into a servant and “the cooks shouted orders [at me]” (Lim 193). When readers take Shiori’s actual social ranking into consideration during the interactions, they would question whether or not it was appropriate to treat a person of high class. It accentuates the belief of society that those of different social standing are supposedly meant to be treated a certain way.
Although this is so small that many people in the audience overlook it, this detail shares a great deal in the significance of the play. Just as the women
Feminism, being a large part of the story, is depicted in several different ways. From the age gap to the Marquis’ dominance over his wife, the man is shown as the prominent figure all the way until the end. Toward the middle of the short story, the Marquis
In the short story, “Harrison Bergeron” Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. relies on the use of irony to indicate where our country will stand once we have gained total equality amongst each other. The theme in “Harrison Bergeron” is that the government cannot enforce equality within the people. The author creates a fictional visualization of the future in the year 2081, where the government controls the people and tortures them in order to maintain “equal opportunity” in their world to prove why it is impossible to achieve absolute equality in the world. Vonnegut dives into a whole other level of uniformity in Harrison Bergeron by focusing on eliminating advantages in appearance, intelligence, strength, and other unique abilities rather than focusing on
The man who cannot reconcile with the reality that others excel in certain areas superior to himself and resorts to ill intents mirrors the government represented in Harrison Bergeron. However, the one terrifying difference is that the government possesses a far more potent power over a large population, compared to an average individual, much like a tyrant. The strict, forced adherence to the laws of equality and standardization presents a tyrannical form of government that is diametrically opposed to the progressive nature and individuality of humans. In the text, outlandish penalties are in effect to deter removal of the government issued handicaps as stated by George Bergeron, “Two years in prison and two thousand dollars fine (Vonnegut),” for even a single lead ball removed. Furthermore, drawing near to the conclusion of Vonnegut’s short story, the government demonstrates a bloody display of destroying opposition when both Harrison Bergeron and his empress were slaughtered by the Handicapper General.
And then, in an explosion of joy and grace, into the air they sprang! Not only were the laws of the land abandoned, but the law of gravity and the laws of motion as well. They reeled, whirled, swiveled, flounced, capered, gamboled, and spun. They leaped like deer on the moon.” These few lines from the passage show how beautiful and amazing this moment is when they aren’t suppressed.
Kurt Vonnegut uses characterization to describe how the characters act in this society. Vonnegut also uses style to show how he uses science fiction and dystopia in “Harrison Bergeron”. The theme demonstrated in “Harrison Bergeron” is equality is not meant to make one person better than another. Kurt Vonnegut in “Harrison Bergeron”, demonstrates that equality based on characteristics is not a good thing for society. Harrison Bergeron is a short story based on the year 2081, where everybody is equal.
The positioning of the characters says the most about this image than anything else; man in the front, and the woman behind him. This is symbolic of women always being behind men in professional environments. Women do not earn the same amount of money as men, no matter how hard they work, and this is shown through their positioning in the image. Moreover, the depiction of both shows that they are intelligent, as they are both wearing glasses, but still unequal in rights. Not only do they both have glasses, but also identical briefcases.
Thesis: In Kurt Vonnegut 's story, "Harrison Bergeron," symbolism, tone, and irony reveal the author 's message to the reader which is his perspective on equality. Notably, there are countless symbols in the narrative "Harrison Bergeron" all of which trace back to the theme of the story. The handicaps people are forced to wear are symbols for the control the government has over people. "George was toying with the vague notion that maybe dancers shouldn 't be handicapped.
The play seems to ‘deny the significance, and even, occasionally the presence of the female characters, however, basing vast power on their chastity and fertility while revealing a patriarchal society. A patriarch society is one that is under the control of men. The males are the heads and the masters, the females are the tails and subjects (Dash, 81). In other words, it is a society that takes women as inconsequential people.