People have the right to practice their religion or not practice any religion. Freedom of religion makes living in the U.S. more comfortable due to the fact that in other countries everyone has to follow one religion. Freedom of protesting is another right that the first amendment grants us. Protests help people get together for a cause and even if it good or bad it should be allowed because we were given the right to protest. Protests created when a group of people gets together to speak for what they believe in.
The founding fathers recognized that along with the First Amendment and the freedom of speech it affords citizens, the right to bear arms should be next. It’s what affords citizens the ultimate ability to preserve the constitution and what we naturally value most, our safety and that of our families. I believe that self-defence by extension is a natural part of the Second Amendment. As statistics indicate, responsible firearm use lowers crime rates and saves lives daily.
The Constitution protects citizens because we would need these rights in important times. The first amendment gives us the freedom of speech without this right citizens would not be able to express their feelings. So that means the citizens would not get to pick the president or any representative. The second amendment gives the citizens the right to bear arms with this right we are able to have a self-defense weapon. But you would have to be licensed to have any weapons.
The first amendment grants protection for American citizens to have freedom of speech. It protects five general areas: speech, religion, press, right to petition the government, and right to assemble. Freedom of the press is a protection that is necessary for journalists, photographers, news corporations and all media. Without the protection, journalists would not be able to uphold their promise to deliver the truth to citizens who do not have the same access to politics, world news and current events the way the journalism industry does. Ultimately, the first amendment grants the press special privileges, but they are not guaranteed all access.
In her case, she cited the fact that the free religion is protected by the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from creating a church an official church and also allows people to worship or not worship as they want. In this case, this right helped Deborah to sue her school successfully. The second right is the freedom of speech and of the press. According to USCIS (n. d.) the freedom of speech and of the press “includes freedom of speech, freedom to peaceably assemble, and the freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances”. Americans are allowed to share their opinions and thoughts as long as they do not disrupt others’ freedom to express themselves as well.
Human dignity, equality, freedom to live without harassment and intimidation, social harmony, mutual respect, and protection of one’s good name and honor are also central to the good life and deserve to be safeguarded. Because these values conflict, either inherently or in particular contexts, they need to be balanced.” Even in our democracies, where free speech is claimed every day by million of people as a complete right to express their opinion, as hurtful as it could be, intellectual pluralism should not belong there. Democracies are created for people’s regulation, satisfaction (« government (...) for the people ») and happiness (proved by the interest created by the notion of Gross National Happiness, which could measure it), and letting everyone express their hate or harm someone orally could attack this idea of happiness promoted by many governments. As a consequence, the Secretary General of the United Nations write a « Model Law Against Racial Discrimination » which restricts the freedom of opinion, expression, and peaceful assembly: « it shall be an offense to threaten, insult, ridicule or otherwise abuse a person or group of persons with words or behavior which may be interpreted as an attempt to cause racial discrimination or racial hatred »; « it shall be an offense to defame an individual or group of individuals on racial grounds.
The right to petition, to assemble, of the press, to practice any religion, and free speech are literally the most basic rights each citizen of the United States of America is entitled to. Being able to say and believe whatever they want to gives people a sense of freedom and comfort in their nation. This idea of freedom instated by our government creates a sense of patriotism inside of the hearts of Americans. Devotion to one’s country can breed not only cooperation between citizens, but also drastic intimidation.
Freedom of Speech and Religion Why is Freedom of Speech and Religion so important in order to speak freely and practice any religion beliefs? There has always been a controversy with the First Amendment and how are we protected, as well as what it protects. The Freedom of Speech is the right for us to express any opinions without restrainment. Freedom of Religion is the right to practice any religion we choose. It is a right for many in America and around the world to know.
v. Heller, The US Supreme Court agrees with me when they say: The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home(gun-control.procon.org). But if gun control is enforced, this will not be true. It will leave lawful
Brad Pitt has said in the past "I feel better having a gun. I don't feel the house is completely safe, if I don't have one hidden somewhere." Also, Washington DC attorney general Karl A Racine said that, “We believe that the District’s gun laws are reasonable and necessary to ensure public safety in a dense urban area.” The actual problem is not the gun, it’s the person. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.
Pick one, read the Syllabus (the majority opinion summary), and take a look at the other opinions, if there are (concurring, dissenting, etc.). HOLT v. HOBBS Verdict 9-0 in favor of Holt Explain why you believe this case is so important I believe that Holt v Hobbs is an important case because it values our first amendment rights for freedom of religion. A governmental agency preventing a man from practicing his religious beliefs is unconstitutional. It sets a standard that all prisoners should be treated with the same religious laws that are provided to citizens.
I think the first amendment is so important because it covers the rights of religious freedom, freedom of speech and the press, and as well as the right to assemble and petition the government. If we weren 't allowed that freedom than this country would not be the great place that it is today. The
This is my favorite Amendment because it allows us as citizens of the U.S. to have our own individual freedoms. The part that mentions freedom of religion is especially important because it separates church from state and allows each citizen the right to choose which religion they want to follow. Some places in the world do not allow this and punish those who rebel against the religion of the land. 3. In your own words explain why the inclusion of your selected Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is important to the citizens of the United States.
Without the Mayflower Compact, the American people might still be governed by England. Similarly, the journey of the pilgrims to find religious and moral freedom has become a symbolic pillar of our nation 's values. When the pilgrims came to America, they were searching for one thing in particular. Their religious freedom, and they were willing to fight tooth and nail for it. Today, freedom is the cornerstone of what it means to be an American.
The Founders thought freedom of religion was important because of the fact that they believed if religious freedom was at risk, all freedom was at risk (Myers). They thought religious freedom was crucial to having a successful nation. The Founders also believed religious freedom caused more freedom and devotion (Myers). They thought this freedom was necessary to a limited government