Exploring How Valspeak in Valley Girl Subculture Exposes Biases in Mainstream Speech Styles
In California, the 1980s were a time of self-exploration, full of groups of young adults on a quest to form a unique identity, different from the rest. One of these subcultures was the Valley Girl subculture from San Fernando Valley. A typical valley girl during that time was a fashionable young White girl from a middle-class family who was usually associated with the entertainment industry due to their proximity to Hollywood. Valley girls had their own specific way of dressing up, which showed in their clothing and hair. However, a big part of their identity was their particular speech pattern, known as Valspeaks. Speech styles are increasingly shaping
…show more content…
When the subculture had just emerged, the use of Valspeaks served to recognize one another as a Valley girl and set them apart from others. However, as the subculture grew, their speaking style entered the media. For instance, In the movie “Clueless,” Cher Horowitz, the main character, embodies the stereotypical White Valley Girl persona. She is depicted as a wealthy, famous, and fashionable high school student living in Beverly Hills, California. Cher’s way of talking and speech patterns align with the classic Valley Girl language traits, such as frequent use of expressions such as “as if,” “whatever,” and “totally.”. Alongside “Clueless,” a song by Moon Zappa further popularized Valspeaks among the American Youth. Zappa’s song was a parody to make fun of Valspeak, and it went completely viral. Most of the verses in the song contained numerous examples of Valspeaks such as “like,” “totally,” “You know what I’m saying,” “Gag me with a spoon,” and “OH MY GOD,” all in an exaggerated Valspeak dialect. Zappa sang the song in the Valley Girl dialect to poke fun at their speech pattern and ridicule the valley girl mannerism. The song further pushed these negative stereotypes about valley girls being self-absorbed intelligent girls whose only hobby is to go shopping and who can’t form a single formal sentence without a filler word. While both the song and movie mocked valley girls, they also popularized the subculture and allowed it to go further than just Southern California’s
Lee 1 Breann Lee Period 3 22 September 2014 Compare and Contrast Paper The books “How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents”, by Julia Alvarez and “Speak” by Laurie Halse Anderson are very similar novels. The main characters share similar experiences growing up in their New York setting that shapes them throughout the book. Both Melinda and Yolanda feel like outcasts because of their low self-esteem and their problems communicating. In “Speak” on Melinda's first day of school Anderson writes “I am clanless…I have entered high school with the wrong hair, the wrong clothes, and definitely the wrong attitude.
When considering Tiffany Hendrickson’s “Storming the Gates: Talking in Color”, I agree with the interconnections of cultural background, speech and race. We often stereotype the way we think a person’s voice should sound based off of their race. In Hendrickson’s essay she talked about how people can code-switch between SAE (Standard American English) and AAE (African-American English) in order to feel more comfortable in different environments. The purpose of this paper is to show the importance of code-switching and how our cultural surroundings relate to the sound of our voices.
Young women are running out of oxygen. Do you know why most of them sound like this? Surprisingly, there is a word or phrase for the way Kim Kardashian speaks. Kim uses something called a vocal fry, a low creaky vibration tone of voice. In the text, They’re, Like, Way Ahead of the Linguistic Currrrve by Douglas Quenqua, he uses tone, style, and structure to show that America’s young women use vocal fry.
Brian Okpei ENGL 203 Professor Nelson Shake 15 November 2017 ***** In order to set oneself apart from the rest, we often tend to establish some sort of unique identity characteristics. This can include clothing styles, musical preferences, personal beliefs and much more indicators. Amongst these indicators is speech which is one of the more significant aspects, seeing as not only can it reveal a lot about someone but also is one of the first things used when evaluating a first impression.
In his essay "Speech Communities," Paul Roberts mentions the importance and impact speech communities have on an individual's form of speech. According to Paul Roberts language is always changing due to three distinct features: age, social class, and geography. All which are the basis for forming speech communities and causing then to eventually adapt and evolve. When discussing the speech communities of a child, Roberts makes an intriguing point. He states that no matter what speech habits were engraved in a child from birth through its parents, they are all prone to change once they interact with a different speech community such as school.
A word can make someone feel weak, worthless, or unappreciated. Words are everything. These ideas are relevant in many essays including “You’re Wearing That?: Understanding Mothers and Daughters in Conversation” by Deborah Tannen, “‘Bros Before Hos’: The Guy Code” by Michael Kimmel, and “‘Queer’ Evolution: Word Goes Mainstream” by Martha Irvine.
One of the drawbacks of SWE in school is the way it can single out students, especially little kids. As mentioned by Foster Wallace, “He cannot alter his vocabulary, usage, or grammar, cannot use slang or vulgarity; and it’s these abilities that are really required for ‘peer rapport,’ which is just a fancy academic term for being accepted by the second-most-important group in the little kid’s life” (Wallace 412). The little kid referred to in this quotation has had the effect of being taught SWE his whole life, and being brought up only requiring that type of English, pushed him away from peers that might’ve developed a new type of communication and slang among themselves. The utilization of SWE can be disadvantageous in certain circumstances as it may become a little unappealing to others who prefer to communicate with individuals who are familiar with their dialect or way of conversing. Consequently, the use of SWE could lead to disinterest in
“So many words were still unknown that when the butcher and the lady at the drugstore said something to me, exotic polysyllabic sounds would bloom in the midst of their sentences. Often, the speech of people in public seemed to be very loud, booming with confidence. The man behind the counter would literally ask, ‘What can I do for you?’ But by being firm and so clear, the sound of his voice said that he was a gringo; he belonged in the public society”(12). Rodriguez describes the way English sounds to him creating an image that the language was very complex to in his perspective.
For example, when he says to Scout, “Don’t say nigger, Scout. That’s common.” (Lee 85) Because of the society Scout has grown up in, she doesn’t known that saying that
Nowadays, we are getting increasingly more of different types of culture and languages in our country.. After reviewing Amy Tan’s “Mother Tongue” and Carmen Fought’s “Language as a Representation of Mexican American Identity,” Tan and Fought agree that non-standard English speakers frequently engage in code-switching, and they argue that standard English speakers need to be more sensitive to and appreciative
In Oakland, California the school board actually considered taking into account African Americans use of Ebonics in order for teachers to better assist with the students learning Standard English in school. This was controversial because Ebonics was not widely accepted by the public or by linguists. Its lack of popularity among the masses is what continues to make it hard to be recognized as a dialect by some whites and blacks alike. Furthermore, it is a contributing factor for its appropriation among non-blacks. This dialect is denoted as “cool” by popular culture, while being refuted largely by white America.
The United States is made up of some of the most diverse and interesting cultures in the world. Jamila Lyiscott proves this by showing her different dialects and how they are all equally important. Lyiscott believes that the way she speaks towards her parents, towards her friends, and towards her colleagues are all one in the same. Throughout the entirety of her speech, Lyiscott changes up her vocal patterns and dialects so that the audience can understand first hand what each of these dialects are. When she talks about her father, Lyiscott uses her native tongue, when she talks to her fellow neighbors and close friends she switches it up to a more urbanized dialect, and when she is in school she masks the other two dialects with a professional sounding language.
In an effort for people to correctly identify themselves, languages adopt and replace numerous terms over time. When it comes to terms to define one’s gender, there is a correlation between the terms and a person’s age. Anne Curzan’s article “Guys and …?” explores the issue of finding age appropriate terms to describe women. The article discusses how this dilemma is prevalent for female college students, as at times neither “girl” nor “woman” seems suitable.
In this chapter I show how male youth talk about their language and identity at the metadiscursive level. I use the term metadiscursive to refer to talk about talk; how three groups – Fly Eight, Cash Money Brothers and Dance Boys – talk about their own linguistic practices and what they mean. Focusing on male youth talk enables an understanding of how identities are authenticated and evaluated on street corners. I will unpack how male youth discuss their identities and how they perceive what it means to be ‘authentically’ township. To get started, two questions needed answers.
Today, this same type of vulgar, erotic “free” language is heard in many styles of music. Especially in the genres of rap and hip hop. People listen to these lyrics at and become desensitized to the overall meaning of what is being conveyed. Opposed to someone who listens to a softer genre of music. This can be a great reason why older generations are more conservative to what they say and how they react, and younger generations are less