“The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything,” - Albert Einstein. Indifference, is the action of seeing all sorts of wrongs, yet, refusing to take action against it. We, as a people, as a society, have grown comfortable, too comfortable to the point that when we see the horrors, the atrocities that happen from across the world, we immediately change the channel, we turn the page, looking for something irrelevant like what Kim Kardashian is wearing or some other celebrity gossip. Therefore, we as individuals have the moral responsibility to correct the errors of our ways, in order to prevent further atrocities. Nevertheless, there will be people who would oppose this ideology. People …show more content…
For example, in Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference”, he says that we mustn’t grow indifferent, lest we repeat what had happened sixty years ago. Not just that, but another great example is in the diagram, the Pyramid of Hate. We become indifferent, bias will grow, bias being stereotyping and things of such magnitude. Furthermore, if we accept and turn blind to the concept and the idea of a biased society, eventually we grow to accept the idea of individual acts of prejudice, things like bullying, name-calling, and de-humanization. From there, if we let the bad apple continue to rot all the others, to let this indifference spread as if it were a virus, then we would grow to accept discrimination, which are things such as segregation, economic discrimination, and political discrimination. Moreover, as we accept discrimination in our lives, we grow to accept bias-motivated violence. Things such as rape, murder, terrorism, vandalism, would become what we perceive as the norm of our society. Finally, at the very peak of it all, lies genocide, the act of killing a people, systematically. Genocide, the very same thing that the Nazis had in plan during World War II. We would only repeat history, we would let things like the Holocaust, happen once more if we were to continue being
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
It is natural for humans to take the path of least resistance. However, if it continues to become the norm, how will we ever break free from the prejudice that is present in our society. The way in which we respond will determine how it will affect us. There can be one of two paths taken: stand idle and continue to allow unjust behavior be afflicted onto us, or step up for what is right, settling for nothing less than equality. As time progresses, we will begin to understand the quality of which we are being treated in comparison to others, and will take action for the benefit of the future.
Holocaust. Death. Suffering. These are but a few of the words that may begin to describe this tragic period in the history of man. The Perils of Indifference and Night are both publications by the Elie Wiesel, one of the many victims to the Holocaust, but one of the very few victims who lived to tell his story.
Holocaust survivor and Nobel Laureate, Elie Wiesel delivered an impassioned speech in which he spoke of the perils of indifference in front of United States and World leaders. During his speech, which as known as the “Perils of Indifference.” Wiesel uses a three pronged approach of pathos, logos, and ethos to demonstrate the dangers standing by and doing nothing. Speaking as a witness, survivor, and teacher, Wiesel successfully argues for the case of action in Kosovo by first making witnesses of the audience, then by questioning the audience’s ethics, and finally showing that the world has learned from the atrocities of the past. First Wiesel uses pathos by telling his story of liberation in a third person narrative, drawing his audience in.
Is it possible for human rights to be actualized for everyone? Can there be true equality? Is it feasible to believe everyone can have all 30 human rights? No, it’s impossible for Human Rights to be actualized for all people. There will always be people who crave power and will violate any human rights to obtain it and people who wouldn’t attempt to stop them.
It also applies to our society in many ways. One example of this is Nazi Germany during World War 2. The Germans often weren’t aware of what the Nazis did to the Jews when they were taken to concentration camps. Near the end of the war, though, when they learned what was really happening, their opinions of what the Nazis were doing changed. They no longer thought they were doing good for their country.
This indifference was exposed in the aftermath of the war, but it also shed a light on other instances in which people have been indifferent, and when they themselves have been prejudiced. This matter is pointed out in Elie Wiesel’s speech “The Perils of Indifference,” which he gave on April 12, 1999. Wiesel listed many events in the 20th century, some that took place after the Holocaust, that could show how often the world was indifferent to the sufferings of others. He mentions that there have been, “two World Wars, countless civil wars, the senseless chain of assassinations -- Gandhi, the Kennedys, Martin Luther King, Sadat, Rabin -- bloodbaths in Cambodia and Nigeria, India and Pakistan, Ireland and Rwanda, Eritrea and Ethiopia, Sarajevo and Kosovo; the inhumanity in
nature are hedonistic, this means that people given the opportunity would avoid painful situations at all costs, while vigorously reaching out for pleasurable moments. An example of reasoning in act Utilitarianism can be found in the biomedical ethics book (Mapes&Gaize pg. 10). A severely ill infant who has zero chances of survival has contracted a deadly virus, the physician and parents now must make the decision to treat the virus with antibiotics or allow the infant to simply die. In this case it is clear that those involved would be best served by allowing the child to simply die, since the infant has nothing to gain and everything to lose from a painful prolonged life. The anguish and distress of the parents cannot be eliminated regardless
Maya Angelou once said, “Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, threatens the future and renders the present inaccessible.” She meant that when prejudice was a major issue in the past it can still threaten our future and leaves the present to the new generations. Leaves the prejudice, racism and current issue to us, lets us do the changing in the world. During the Civil Rights Movement during the 1960s people have been prejudice and have been changing the way the world was at the time. While doing this, racism was forming and more current issues started.
Indifference can be defined as the lack of sympathy or concern for others. More importantly, it is the active decision by many to not speak up against wrong doings. This makes crises last longer and do more harm because of people not speaking up. For example, Syria’s education is struggling, especially with wartime and the violence surrounding the children. In the text “Generation missing out on school in wartime Syria '', it states, “Experts say that puts a whole generation of Syrians at risk of coming of age illiterate, lost to a war that has killed some 140,000 people already.
I mentioned in the midterm that oppression is like a birdcage. If there is just one person with prejudicial attitude then escape is possible, but when the entire society begins to take on those prejudicial ideas it turns into a cage that traps you. In my opinion institutional discrimination is much more repressive than a birdcage. It allows for unjust acts like not promoting someone, not giving someone the education they deserve or even killing someone because of what they look like or because they are a part of a certain group. Because of this, I view
The Perils of Indifference Critical Evaluation Essay In the past, indifference has led to the murder of millions of people. Indifference is when we, the humans race, do not care about those who suffer from the injustice, violence, or oppression on behalf of others (Clare). On 12 April 1992, Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor gave a speech regarding human indifference in front of President William J. Clinton and the first lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton, at the White House. What was he trying to accomplish during his speech?
The concept of discrimination then leads to the civil rights movement. Whites turned on the African Americans, after the use of slavery, they went full on offensive. Hate crimes started towards them and it was chaos (“Racial”). It seemed like this influence has spread and now people are attacking the minority group.
The perils of indifference was a speech given by Elie Wiesel on April 12, 1999 as part of the Millennium Lecture series hosted by President Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton. Elie Wiesel is a Holocaust survivor and a Nobel Laureate. He experienced first hand the injustices and suffering during the Holocaust. As a teenage in the year 1944, Wiesel and his family were torn apart by the Nazis, they were deported from their home in Hungary and sent to the Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland. Wiesel recalls facing hunger, strict discipline, and slavery.
He gives examples of significant events from the 20th century that are examples of acting with indifference, such as America supplying Nazi Germany with oil or not saving Jews during World War II, but also not acting with indifference, for example the collapse of Nazis, communism and
Elie Wiesel’s somber speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, demonstrated the harsh reality of the numerous evils harvesting in the world. The main evil though was simply indifference, or a lack of concern. As a young Jewish boy, he faced the wickedness of the Holocaust, imprisoned at Buchenwald and Auschwitz and also losing both his parents and younger sister. The speaker saw atrocious horrors and suffered for a prolonged amount of time. Why was this permitted?