The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

569 Words3 Pages

Generations to come, ponder the ideology of: Should the Electoral College continue to hold the power of electing the President of the United States? The process of appointing electors varies by state, but generally, political parties nominate electors at their state conventions. Each state is allocated electoral votes equal to its total number of representatives in Congress. The Electoral College provides each state with a certain number of electors based on its representation in Congress, which combines the proportional representation of the House of Representatives with the equal representation of the Senate; Aiming to prevent the dominance of more populous states over smaller ones. The Electoral College is an effective form of campaigning for the next president as it’s consistent, balances regional interests, and it preserves federalism. Consistency plays a huge role in Americans day to day routines. Similarly, the Electoral College ensures the same. The Electoral College has been a longstanding part of the American electoral process. Its continuity provides stability and a predictable framework for presidential elections. The article “The …show more content…

It prevents densely populated urban areas from dominating the election, as candidates need to appeal to a broader range of states and regions to secure the necessary electoral votes. The document “The Pros and Cons of the Electoral College” goes through a multitude of examples, one being, “Imagine a U.S. presidential election with no Electoral College. If only the popular vote mattered, candidates might concentrate their energies on densely populated metro areas like New York, Los Angeles and Chicago” (document 2). In other words, without the system in place, the alternate solution would be to count each vote individually. Ultimately, giving the larger states with the bigger population the

Open Document