For better or worse, the United States is a global superpower; while it has only been around for about 200 years, its influence on the world and its citizens is relatively overbearing. To guide a nation, strong leaders must step up and protect the citizens’ inalienable rights. In the United States, the president is chosen by the Electoral College, which is made up of votes from dozens of states. But as decades fly by and the world advances and improves, how is it possible that a system made hundreds of years ago can still serve its citizens equally? Is it possible that regardless of the intention and thought put into the system, that the Electoral College causes more harm to the ones it is supposed to protect? Or perhaps has the Electoral College …show more content…
As the mode in which electing a president needed to prevent the possibility of “cabal, intrigue, and corruption”, stated by Alexander Hamilton, and thus the Electoral College was born. Our current system follows the regulations dictated by the US Constitution and 12th amendment: each state is assigned a number of votes based off said state’s population and whomever receives the majority of the votes wins that year's election. The system was crafted in attempts to make sure bigger states did not hold an absurd amount of power over smaller states; it was crafted to serve the republic. The political and socio-economical climate is completely different than the one in which the Electoral College was created in. In fact, the original design was “supposed to work without political parties and without national campaigns”, giving more choice to the public. Yet as people began pledging loyalties to candidates and their respective political parties, the election process was altered with the 12th amendment, but it was not enough. As of recently, there has been over 700 proposals in favor of reforming or abolishing the …show more content…
voting system is not only rooted in white supremacy and oppression, but also perpetuates it. While not obvious at first glance, there was another reason that the Electoral College was created: the slave population. James Madison, a promeninet American icon, was incredibly aware that both the South and North had an equal amount of people, but the same anot be said of eligible voters. About one-third of the Southern population were enslaved, therefore the South would have been at a disadvantage. Even after slavery had ended, it was difficult to have your vote be counted if you were anything but a white man. As each state could regulate their own laws, many southern states took to systemically disadvantaging black people and allowing white supremacy to prevail. Unfourtantely, these elections have also caused intense violence across the country, especially recently. The 2020 U.S. presidential election caused many election administrators distress over death threats, online radicliation, the circulation of white supermacist ideas, and most notably, the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol. All of these attacks can be attributed to how terrifying loyal America citizens are to their political parties. The future of democracy in America seems bleak. With the last three years being horrendously fuilled with a lack of organization, riots, petty campaigns, and impeachments, it get harder to
The Electoral College is a method that was established by the Founding Fathers of the United States within the Constitution. The Electoral College has been the subject of more proposed amendments than any other provision of the U.S. Constitution (Richie and Levien 353). The Founding Fathers did not intend for the Electoral College to be a perfect democratic system, but James Madison, strongly opposed winner-take-all laws. The Electoral College is a vital part of Federalism, which is the foundation of the system of government and without it no candidate would be likely to receive a majority (Bond and Smith 343-352). Though, there are many downfalls to the Electoral College.
What is the electoral college? It is the system that the United States of America uses to elect its president and vice president, and while many argue about its effectiveness, its disadvantages are alarming. It was outlined and created in the Constitution in Article II, Section I, Clause II, because the framers of the Constitution feared democracy. This system allows for a group of people to formally cast their respective state’s vote for the election of the president and vice president every four years, on the basis of who wins the majority in the General Election in their state. Although it was created with the best intentions by the writers of the Constitution, we now believe that this system, the electoral college, is not the most fair
One reason that the framers of the constitution included the Electoral College is because they believed people will only vote for people in their own states and basically play favorites. However, in modern democracy it is evident that this system no longer benefits entirely the people of the states’. It must be modified because the restrictions that vary state to state through each election is now unnecessary in today’s society. In a presidential election an electoral vote should count the same as a popular vote no matter the circumstances. The states that remain mutual in a presidential candidacy election, where the populations are evenly divided causes an issue of winning the state
” We should be realistic that the “game” is not going to change anytime, as a few people seem to agree with on nerdwallet.com. However, I feel that this is a good example of us humans always wanting “more” then what we already having and not learning to satisfy with what we have. We must be aware that as stated on uselectionatlas.org, “although there were a few anomalies in its early history, none have occurred in the past century. Proposals to abolish the Electoral College, though frequently put forward, have failed largely because the alternatives to it appear more problematic than is the College itself.”
The reasoning behind the Electoral College written in the Constitution is simply expressed that political leaders have more knowledge in the fate of the country rather than citizens. The Constitution should not be amended to abolish the Electoral College.
By contrast there, were 3.2 million US teachers as of 2017 and well over 3.7 million fast food workers as of 2018, yet very little was said about teachers and not a word was said about fast food workers during the 2016 election. The most logical reason for the abolition of the Electoral College is the fact that it is an undemocratic institution that is rooted in a mistrust for Americans of the lower classes. To reiterate, the Electoral College was created because the majority of Americans at the time of its creation were poor and uneducated, factors that the framers of the Constitution though made
The Electoral College was a part of the federal plan that our forefathers set for the American people. While it made a place for the stars, as well as the people living in them, by giving them a say in the Federal process and preventing bigger cities from taking over in the presidential election, opponents believe that this is not the case. Even after difficulties that the United States has been through, the states have control over a large number of laws, management, and finance which impact the lives of citizens. Each and every state has their own political cultures, ways of behaving and traditions that continue regardless of our short-term population, a connected economy and news media. The Electoral College was meant to be a way to solve the problems with one large state dominating over another small state based on the population.
Unlike any other democracy in the world, the United States elects its president using the electoral college system. Not even state and local level elections within the United States use this archaic approach. The system was created to protect the interests of smaller states, yet it has failed to do so, meaning it is no longer relevant. The electoral college system is unfair and should be abolished because of the dominance of the winner-takes-all system, inequality of votes, and reliance on electors.
“The Electoral College was created by the Founders because they did not trust people enough to allow them to directly elect the president.” Since the majority of the American people had limited education and communication, the founders felt the “average voter lacked the information to be an informed, unbiased judge of candidates for presidency.” Therefore when voters cast their ballot, the college reviews the peoples’ choices and then decides which of their preferences are best. (Lenz and Holman, 87) Many people feel that this system is undemocratic because they are not able to directly vote for their candidate and because the winner of the popular vote can lose the electoral vote.
All of these are good things, but they do not outweigh the system we currently have. As the great Burt Lance said, “If it aint broke, don’t fix it.” In conclusion, the Electoral College system is essential to ensure that all states have equal representation in the election process, provide a clear winner, make sure that the President and Vice President are elected by most of the country, and are elected by a diverse group of people. Despite the criticisms that the system has received, we should maintain the Electoral College system to ensure that our democracy is fair, representative, and
In order to take a more perceptive look into the electoral college debate, we will need to take a look into the history of the debate as well as the Founding Fathers’ intentions for it. The first thing that we need to take a look at would be the Founding Fathers' intentions as well as how the electoral college changed throughout history. In the article “Electing the People’s President: The Popular Origins of the Electoral College” it is stated that “Our Founding Fathers understood that America is a nation of both ‘we the people’ and a federal system of states” (Villegas 202). What Villegas is saying is that the Founding Fathers' looked at the people’s rights, as stated in the promised bill of rights during the Continental Congress. Most people who argue against the electoral college say that the people’s will and saying of “we the people” in the Constitution are violated, but rather it is a compromise between giving the people a chance at a say of the vote, as well as the federal state of
People argue that it allows participation from every state including rural areas that would be otherwise overlooked. This system might have worked in the 1700’s but in today's modern society, it begins to crumble. The Electoral college needs to be expunged because it causes overlooking of states, electors dont accurately represent the populus, and it is no longer relevant. Candidates don’t have to campaign to every state causing an overlooking of smaller states.
politics, while others want to abolish the institution.” (Josephson, 2016) There are both pros and cons to the Electoral College as established by the founders. One reason to keep the Electoral College is highly populated areas of the united states may be more enticing to a candidate to visit than small rural towns. The time given to acquire the votes of these larger areas may leave the values and needs of the voters in smaller states without consideration. “One reason that some analysts support the electoral college is that it encourages candidates to pay attention to small states and not just get out the vote in big, populous states and cities”.
With the system, it balances out the power, allowing smaller states to still have a massive impact on the election. " When the Electoral College was created, James Madison hoped it would avoid the silencing of minority opinions by an overly influential majority. Madison worried that factions might arise within the country that would harm the nation as a whole. He believed that these factions could be kept in check by making the election of the president representative rather than direct. For those who support the Electoral College, the system is crucial to maintaining the rights of individual states, specifically states with smaller
To begin, the Electoral College takes into account the individual states that people live in. This is considered arbitrary since people now identify with the nation as a whole rather than their individual states. Since the Electoral College is “winner take all”, this renders certain sections of the country as “already decided”. People who choose to deviate from the