A debate that has existed in American politics for centuries has flared up again. The debate in question is whether we should keep our Electoral College for the purpose of electing our President or abolish it and elect our Presidents through a popular vote. Those who seek to abolish the Electoral College cite instances -recent and past- in which Presidential Candidates have won the popular vote yet lost the majority of the Electoral College. They also argue that the undemocratic philosophy behind the Electoral College, the thought that the American people aren’t competent enough to choose their own Commander in Chief, is an outdated remnant of a backwards past that has no place in modern society and law. Those who seek to preserve the Electoral …show more content…
Ideally, the Electors are supposed to be highly educated and qualified individuals whose job is to make sure that the President of our country is the person that is best suited for the office. was of course due to fact that the majority of the population were illiterate, rural farmers who lacked the time and ability to make informed choices for the purpose of voting. In that sense the College isn’t an undemocratic force of evil but rather a safeguard against incompetent and potentially dangerous people running the country. As of fairly recently Electoral College has gained the additional role amplifying rural parts of the country’s power in choosing the commander in chief, acting as a safeguard for peoples with minority views from potential abuse from the nation’s ideological majority, similar to the Senate’s role giving smaller rural populations a greater say in legislation. Furthermore, the Electoral College gives an absolutely certain answer to who will be the next president as elections rarely result in any one candidate winning over half of the popular vote due to third-party and independent candidates. Supporters of the Electoral College argue that if it were abolished then our elections would be flooded with candidates from every third and single-issue party imaginable resulting in presidents winning elections will well under half of the …show more content…
Our literate population combined with an abundance of modern technology gives the masses the ability to make informed voting decisions making the Electoral College’s original purpose no longer relevant in today’s world. The Electoral College has also given rise to “swing states,” or states that fluctuate from election to election which side of the political spectrum they favor. As a result, presidential candidates have been forced to focus the majority of their time on these few states. This causes politicians to make campaign promises catered to them just to gain political favor which translates into policies once someone is in office that do not impact the majority of the country. For example, candidates in the latest election discussed coal and how to save coal jobs even though there were only about 68,413 US coal miners as of 2015. By contrast there, were 3.2 million US teachers as of 2017 and well over 3.7 million fast food workers as of 2018, yet very little was said about teachers and not a word was said about fast food workers during the 2016 election. The most logical reason for the abolition of the Electoral College is the fact that it is an undemocratic institution that is rooted in a mistrust for Americans of the lower classes. To reiterate, the Electoral College was created because the majority of Americans at the time of its creation were poor and uneducated, factors that the framers of the Constitution though made
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral
The electoral college is a system where people vote for electors. Then the electors communicate with the people and the electors pick the candidates. Next the people vote between democrat and republican parties. The problems with the electoral college voting system is that the electors do not listen to what the people want and they just make their own decisions, there is a chance of a tie in the electoral college, and also the people don't even get to vote on who the electors are. Furthermore, a very large problem with the electoral college is that the electors are not listening to the people.
In 1787, years after the founding of the United States, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the new nation would govern itself. The delegates understood that the need for a leader was necessary but still bitterly remembered how Britain abused of its power. The delegates agreed that the President and Vice President should be chosen informally and not based on the direct popular vote, thus gave birth to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.” Since 1787 the Electoral College has been the system for voting in the United States, but with our nation ever more changing and growing it
In the United States, there is a popular belief that the public decides presidential elections directly, as in a true democracy; however, this is only part of the truth, due to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is the system that the United States has in place to decide the president and vice-president, the way that it works is the United States people vote for electors who will represent them in a vote based on each states population (Jost & Giroux Sec. 1 Par. 6). The Electoral College is a widely debated topic among people in the United States, as stated in a document by Jost and Giroux “The Electoral has been controversial throughout U.S. history” (Jost & Giroux Sec. 1 Par.
As of recently a debate that has existed in American politics for centuries has flared up again. The debate in question is whether we should keep our Electoral College for the purpose of electing our President or abolish it and elect our Presidents through a popular vote. Those who seek to abolish the Electoral College cite instances -recent and past- in which Presidential Candidates have won the popular vote yet lost the majority of the Electoral College. They also argue that the undemocratic philosophy behind the Electoral College, the thought that the American people aren’t competent enough to choose their own Commander in Chief, is an outdated piece of a backwards past that has no place in modern society and law. Those who seek to preserve the Electoral College as it is state that the electoral system the framers of the Constitution created is as good as it can
Although the electoral college was created for many understandable reasons, in today's society it is outdated and needs to be replaced with a system that appropriately matches the development of the country. The electoral college is a group of representatives that will ultimately vote for the president. They cast votes for the states they represent which in turn will decide who becomes our president. This is known as an
The New York Times defines The Electoral College as “a group of people that elects the president and the vice president of the United States” (Bromwich 2016). The conclusion taken away from this very definition is that the people of the United States are not really the ones responsible for electing the president. This is often a misconception of the election process. Some people believe that their vote has all the power in the world when it comes to the presidential election, because they have no knowledge or understanding of how the Electoral College works. Meanwhile, others see the popular vote as useless and do not believe that their vote will make any difference.
To begin, the Electoral College takes into account the individual states that people live in. This is considered arbitrary since people now identify with the nation as a whole rather than their individual states. Since the Electoral College is “winner take all”, this renders certain sections of the country as “already decided”. People who choose to deviate from the
This is very helpful because some people are not aware of their decision. Finally, the electoral college prevents too many third party candidates from running. Third parties don’t win but they do steal votes. These are the reasons why we should keep the electoral college and why we shouldn’t have a popular vote system.
Some people believe that the electoral college is wonderful because it had given people more equal rights, while there are others who despise it because people believe that the system was unfair. The electoral college is one of the most controversial topics that has been spoken about over multiple years. The arguments mainly all begin to rise when the presidential election is near, it has been talked about numerous amounts of times throughout history. While some people like the electoral college, I believe that the electoral college should be eliminated.
In a twenty-first century environment, the Electoral College is unfair. Caroline Jenkins makes this case against the Electoral College: In testimony before Congress in 1997, the League of Women Voters pointed out that apart from the public outcry that would be caused by circumvention of the popular will, there are a number of other serious flaws in the Electoral College system. The Electoral College system is fundamentally unfair to voters. In a nation where voting rights are grounded in the one-person, one-vote principle, the Electoral College is a hopeless anachronism.
I really enjoyed this video because ever since I grasped the idea of the Electoral College I have disagreed with it. However, I never really did any research revolving what goes on behind closed doors. The premises most definitely lead to the conclusion without any additional points. We see that the Electoral College ruins democracy because citizens of smaller states have a louder, more important voice than their larger neighboring states. This means that the votes of the larger states will, in a sense, be ignored also like the wants, and needs of people in set states.
Robert Montgomery Mr. Bowers Comp I November A Failed System In America, where we idealize democracy and the voice of the people, we have a system in place to elect our highest official that not only suppresses millions of voters but also flies blatantly in the face of democracy. The Electoral College is the institution that has decided on the outcome of dozens of presidential elections. It is a system that was flawed when it was implemented just over 200 years ago, and in the modern era, it has outrightly failed. Under the College, the states do not have equal pull in the election due to many factors.
All through the history of the United States of America, many people have discussed the abolishment of the Electoral College. For many reasons, some believe it is what makes our country have the type of government we have, some believe that it's what limits the power of the government, and many people such as Mitch McConnell believes it is what gives us our freedom and prosperity. While these are valid arguments there is a multitude of reasons to why the electoral college should be abolished. Such as there is only a need for twelve states in order to become the president, popular vote of the people for president can still lose, and the Swing states are given too much power and attention compared to that of the other states. This is why I believe in the abolishment of the Electoral College.
The Electoral College has many good attributes some of those include giving equal representation to the small states and keeping the system simple. “The election of 2000 is one of the rare cases where the winner of the popular vote did not also win the electoral vote, but the electoral vote reflected the fact that Bush won in far more states (30) than did Gore, and thus highlighted the federal nature of the system.” The outcome of this election shows how the Electoral College more accurately represents the citizens votes than the popular vote. In this scenario without the electoral college the election would have been swayed in favor of the larger more populous states. “the Electoral Colleges strengthens the two-party system and discourages third-party challengers who could further fragment the existing political system.”