ipl-logo

What Were The Legal Issues Involved In King Charles I's Trial

814 Words4 Pages

Reading Response #3 The Trial of King Charles I In the early seventeenth century King Charles I wanted to be an absolute ruler. This created conflict against the members of Parliament and the House of Commons because they thought that no king should have complete power over the people. They also believed that the people would not be fairly represented. This dilemma did not bothered King Charles because he wanted both money and power, over the will of the common people. 1) What were the legal issues involved in King Charles I’s trial before the “rump” Parliament of England in 1649? Charles I became heir to the throne of England, Scotland, and Ireland in 1625. Over time Charles found it was hard to keep Parliament satisfied. There was constant ongoing tension over money and power between Parliament and Charles. In addition, England was at war across the glob which …show more content…

They also believed that Charles’s should be justified. To justify someone would mean to pay the consequences of one 's action or to make a wrong doing, right. Parliament remained faithful to England by trying to justify this treason. King Charles must be stopped for the good of the people. The only way to insure this was by Charles death. “The decision to bring the king to justice created two legal problems. The first was to identify a crime upon which the trial would be based.” “The second problem was to make the court itself a legitimate tribunal.” (TW 519) King Charles selfishly wanted to rule with all power. Parliament wanted to morally represent the people in a fair manor. Parliament knew they could not rule without a king, so they decided to replace Charles. During the English Civil War, justice is best understood as doing what is right to protect the majority. King Charles had a different idea, he wanted to rule the majority to his advantage. Putting King Charles was both just and

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast The Tea Act Of 1773

    423 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Tea Act of 1773 reinstated the issue of Britain’s right to tax the colonies. The Parliament and the colonies disagreed on a system of government in which the colonies would share the same rights and control as Parliament over their colonial affairs. Between 1773 and 1776, enormous amounts of tension between the center and the peripheries regarding the right to control the colonies led to the disintegration of the empire. The colonies and Parliament continued their dispute about the supremacy of the colonies that began with the Stamp Act of 1765.

    Read More

  • Were The American Colonists Justified Dbq Analysis

    608 Words  | 3 Pages

    How the colonists responded when faced with difficulty has greatly altered the path of their country. In 1760 a new king , King George III, came into power and brought destruction with jim when he began passing act after outrageous act which sparked a need for rebellion among the colonies. Did the colonists have valid reason to break away from great Britain? The colonists were justified in their actions because the king was a tyrant, they were being forced into silence, and they encountered unprovoked violence. King George III was constantly abusing his power over the colonists and acting irrationally.

    Read More

  • Settling In The New World Dbq Essay

    1248 Words  | 5 Pages

    The king is defined as having as his objective, “…the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States” (Document 7). The desire for the British to exercise complete control over the colonies, and an unwillingness to negotiate any peaceful compromise made war

    Read More

  • Oliver Cromwell Dbq

    1000 Words  | 4 Pages

    After the kings execution the republic was created. His actions were also helpful in the key factors involved in developing a democracy. He made England’s law system much more efficient and fair to the people. This made English laws much less harsh and even took away the death penalty for certain crimes. Because of Cromwell’s success, the government became much stronger by raising taxes and spending revenue in much more efficient ways.

    Read More

  • Why Does Charles I Need Absolute Monarchy?

    785 Words  | 4 Pages

    That is why absolute monarchy is a negative system, as the government begins to care more about power and not their fellow ones. As said before, absolute monarchy is a bad way to rule a country, and Charles I can give us an example why. His reign was made of only his decisions, and no one could say the contrary. He could raise taxes, and imprison

    Read More

  • Why Is Chrlemange A Good Leader

    584 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Charles" did not spend all of his time and energy on warfare. He was a great admirer of education. He built schools across Europe. He brought scholars down. Among these scholars were some of the greatest religious scholars and teachers of the Middle Ages.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was America Justified In Waging War

    625 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first reason the revolution is justified is that the colonists had no representatives in parliament. Parliament was a branch of the British monarchy that created laws and acts for the colonies and the U.K. The problem was, not one representative in parliament was from the colonies and knew the conditions there. Parliament was absolutely clueless. Most of this,of course, was the King’s doing.

    Read More

  • What Caused The American Revolution Dbq Analysis

    529 Words  | 3 Pages

    “[The British declare] that parliament can ‘of right make laws to bind us all in cases whatsoever’” (Dickinson and Jefferson, Document 5). Another reason why American colonists were justified in waging war on the British is because of the growing acts of British violence against the colonists. “Order quickly broke down, and the frightened soldiers fired into the crowd.

    Read More

  • Revolutionary War Dbq Questions And Answers

    558 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many people in the colonies believed he was a tyranny and wanted absolutely nothing to do with him. The only people that wanted to have a king or any political relations with England were the loyalists, or Tories. As Document 3 displays, the colonists wanted the loyalists out of their new to be country. Because they wanted the Tories out of the colonies, they hung them by a pole by their waste and tarred and feathered them. Many documents that the colonists wrote made a large contribution to their political system, which are still in effect in today’s political systems.

    Read More

  • Blessed Charles The Good Analysis

    1894 Words  | 8 Pages

    "The Murder of Charles the Good." Readings in Medieval History. 4th ed. Toronto: Published by University of Toronto Press, 2010. 382-93. Print.

    Read More

  • Henry Purcell's Fairy Queen: A Case Study

    1003 Words  | 5 Pages

    Henry Purcell’s The Fairy Queen: A Case Study The evolution of music can be viewed as a linear timeline of key, innovative composers who have far-reaching influences upon the musical continuum and perhaps epitomises the societal views which are relevant to their time period through their canonical pieces. As a result, in order to conduct a case study into any piece of music one must first realise said piece in regards to the concurrent political climate. Between 1642 and 1651 England was characterised by turmoil through civil war, which was essentially caused over the conduct of British government. This war was between the Parliamentarians and the Royalists, with the Parliamentarians being the victor.

    Read More

  • Stamp Act Dbq

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    Parliament believed that after all England had done, the colonies owed them money from the war. This did not settle well with the colonists. The Americans, after

    Read More

  • Why Is Thomas Fairfax Called The American Revolution

    1208 Words  | 5 Pages

    Parliament's backing originated from the townspeople a number of whom were radical Protestants or Puritans. I believe the events of the English Civil War could have happened in any other European country during this time period because of the strength of the Parliament. The wars profoundly separated individuals at the time, yet it is clear that Charles was not a fruitful ruler. He had a high idea of imperial power, having confidence in the celestial right of lords. The Civil Wars were basically meetings between the government and Parliament over the meanings of the forces of the government and Parliament's power.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre

    1586 Words  | 7 Pages

    Throughout the literature, there is great controversy concerning how the king may have allowed for the massacre to take place. The people came to believe that the king had given them permission and that they were doing his bidding. However, the appearance of letters presenting the opposite to be true demonstrates that this was not the case. Charles XI decision pertaining this issue was that he did not want the Protestants to be attacked in any way.

    Read More

  • The War That Made America By Fred Anderson

    1207 Words  | 5 Pages

    By pursuing this methodology, Faragher details the reasons why the British crown felt justified in its actions and how those actions impacted the

    Read More

More about What Were The Legal Issues Involved In King Charles I's Trial

Open Document