Charlemagne was the one of the great rulers of early European history. He was the King of the Franks in the 8th century and facilitated great expansion of his empire through conquest and diplomacy. Einhard was a monk who lived under Charlemagne’s rule, and, in a glowing light, he wrote a biography of Charlemagne. Einhard describes many of Charlemagne’s achievements, and he also writes about Charlemagne’s character. Einhard believed Charlemagne was a great leader because of his military success, his beautification of the kingdom, and his exceptional character qualities. The beginning portion of Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne describes a series of wars and conquests that built up the Frankish empire. The Bavarian war, the Saxon war, and the …show more content…
Einhard describes Charlemagne as a humble leader with several pieces of evidence. The first is that Charlemagne would wear the clothes of the common man. He would wear the “national dress”, which consisted of linen pants and shirt (Einhard 318). This is in contrast to earlier leaders who were deified and wore the most expensive garb available, such as Augustus. Charlemagne also was extremely generous to those in need around his kingdom, and even to Christians that lived in other parts of the world. Einhard believes these characteristics of Charlemagne connect him to his people, and thus allow him to rule effectively. The humbleness of Charlemagne most likely stems from his involvement with the Christian religion. According to Einhard Charlemagne was a fervent worshipper and practitioner of Christianity, “he was a constant worshipper at this church as long as his health permitted, going morning and evening, even after nightfall” (Einhard 319). One of the many tenants of Christianity is to give to poor; Charlemagne is a firm believer and so he gives often. His faith also was a component in the buildings he constructed; he tended to focus on repairing and erecting edifices with religious significance, such as the church at Aix-la-Chapelle. Einhard believes Charlemagne’s faith in the Lord led to many positive developments for the Frankish
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Charlemagne was also known as Charles the Great. He was king of the Franks and he united the majority of Western Europe during the early Middle Ages. On top of that, he laid the foundations for modern France and Germany. He attempted to unite all Germanic peoples into one kingdom and convert his subjects to Christianity. Being a skilled military strategist, he spent much of his reign in warfare so that he could manage to accomplish his goals. Because of his position, he encouraged the Carolingian Renaissance.
FROISSART’S CHRONICLES This paper will discuss the view of Jean Froissart (c. 1337-1410), his place in history as well as his weaknesses and strengths. Froissart’s Chronicles is his best known work and looks at a period in European history during the first half of the Hundred Years War, which was a war between England and France that took place from 1337 to 1453. Froissart was a Frenchman, born in Valenciennes, which is now a part of Belgium, but he also spent some time serving in the English court among nobility.1 Froissart was neutral in his account of the events of the Hundred Years’ War.
Author of the book, Becoming Charlemagne, by Jeff Sypeck provides a clear glimpse into the life of one of the world’s greatest kings and ruler and later emperor Charlemagne, otherwise known as Karl or Charles the Great. Sypeck creates a vivid and strong look into the time of Charlemagne, early medieval Europe and some other important world leaders, including Pope Leo III, Irene the Byzantine emperor, Alcuin the scholar and Harun al-Rashid ruler of Baghdad. These figures are crucial to the story of Karl becoming Charlemagne, and their stories included in the book help form and symbolize Charlemagne the Ruler. Understanding Charlemagne and early medieval Europe is presented vibrantly throughout the book by in-depth stories, facts and a clear
Before the fall of the Roman Empire Constantine the Great faced many oppositions including gaining the support of the Roman people in his conversion to Christianity. Likewise, Clovis the “unifier of the Frankish Kingdom” faced the same oppositions with his conversion. Thus, accounts during the Early Middle Ages can be filled with biased and speculation. Despite, common bias during this time, the account of “The Conversion of Clovis: Two Accounts, 496,” is a genuine historical account of events. Specifically, the account is explanatory not observational, throughout the text it gives details which can be supported.
King Offa is seen as one of the most influential leaders when it comes to the topic of Saxon Kings. The King of Mercia, King Offa’s title, has been recognized by many because of his ruthless and strong characteristics he gained during his rule. Focusing on many of Offa’s ideas, it is seen that the King of Mercia set extremely high standards for many of his successors. Unifying southern England and creating ties with continental European leaders helped prove that Offa is one of the greatest Saxon leaders.
The reign of Charlemagne was full of wars and invasions (Bauer). He was half king of the Frankish empire while his brother Carloman was in control of the other half. Charlemagne who was also known as, “Charles the Great”, king of the Franks reigned from approximately (742-814). He was a strong leader who unified Western Europe through military power and the blessing of the church(Boussard). With his strong belief in the need for education among the Frankish people, his ambition was to bring about religious, political and educational reforms(Williams).
With the fall of the Carolingian Empire, Europe was left in a frantic and militaristic state marked by violence amongst fluctuating kingdoms and territorial leaders. In the early 12th century, however, France was beginning to experience a positive change in the monarchy when Louis the VI became king in 1108. Also known as Louis the Fat (due to his massive weight towards the end of his life), Louis was able to assert his force as king by giving just, and often violent, punishments to criminals and enemies. Once a confidant to the king and eventually the abbot of St. Denis, Suger writes about Louis’ various acts in The Deeds of Louis the Fat. These deeds helped to shape France’s monarchy into a powerful, centralized unit that would continue for
Since the fall of the western Roman empire, there has never been another emperor of the west until Charlemagne came along, in christmas day year 800 Pope Leo the third at rome’s st. peter’s basilica crowned karl as emperor of the holy roman empire, karl stated that he did not know why he was being summoned to rome, but it is unlikely that he wasn't aware of what was going on. His coronation was met with cheers and applause, with pomp and circumstance, as the people rejoiced their new god appointed emperor of the romans who was himself a german. The coronation itself was major turning point in history, many historian agree that that reason why charlemagne accepted his ascension into emperorship was so that he could justify his occupation of
The Comparison between Roland and Oliver’s first and second argument in the song of Roland The Song of Roland was written at the end of the eleventh century. It is a French epic, and it is considered the most ancient in the medieval times. However, its author is unknown. The poem is referring to the times of the King Charlemagne, or Grand Charles, who reigned in France during this time. He was considered an elderly Christian leader, who ruled with warmth and compassion.
First, he embraced a great religious toleration. Charles II brought back the Anglican Church, but he didn’t deiced the state religion and force his belief on others. He successfully maintained the religious harmony in his country. In contrast, Louis XIV of France, who believed in the motto, "one king, one law, one faith," established a bunch of anti-Protestant policies, aimed at converting the Hugue nots to Catholicism, and such action rendered France in conflicts. Besides, Charle I’s refusal to compromise over complex religious situations led to the eventual civil war.
Charlemagne, King of the Franks, King of the Lombards, and Emperor of Rome, did not achieve these positions just with luck. He worked hard to dominate his kingdom and gain respect from the people. How did Charlemagne become such a powerful figure during the 7th and 8th century? Many contributing factors played a role to his success including the work that his father and grandfather did in order to unite the kingdom and pass it down to Charlemagne, working with the Catholic Church, and conquering land through quite a few wars and campaigns. There are also certain characteristics
Professor John France 's article, "Crusading Warfare and Its Adaptation to Eastern Conditions in the Twelfth Century" provides a detailed account of the alterations European and Muslim crusaders conducted to their styles of combat throughout the twelfth century to adapt to Eastern conditions. The article offers ___________________________. France primarily argues that the role of cavalry during the twelfth century has been amplified by previous historical accounts. ____(how author makes his point) ___________
Charlemagne made decisions on which battles to fight, who to choose as his allies, and how he can improve the land he ruled. Although it is possible that not every decision that Charlemagne made was the best choice, most of his important decisions were documented by Einhard. Naturally, Einhard would want to portray all decisions good or bad because it was a huge part of Charlemagne’s life as a high king. All decisions Charlemagne made had a huge impact to many people, allies or enemies, during the time of his ruling. Charlemagne made many decisions which include who to become allies with, which battles to fight, and how to improve his