What is The First Amendment? A great bringer of conflict in the United States, it states some of the most fundamental rights in America, including the freedom of expression and the freedom of religion. The interpretation of these rights has been under a lot of debate, and many cases have arisen in the history of this country over what constitutes as free expression, especially religious expression. From the religious persecution of the early US to the court cases of today, religious freedom has been an evolving controversial issue that leaves uncertainty about the future. To understand why religious freedom has become so controversial, it helps to know what constitutes as religious freedom.
Nowadays we often en counter the words such as “freedom” and “freedom of speech”. This two words are heavily linked to each other, however not every individual realizes the fact that we use this two components of law in our daily life. Yes that is right! Since every individual is granted freedom by means of constitution it also has effect of how a person expresses him or herself. In other words if there was no freedom there wouldn’t be any Freedom of Speech.
These freedoms have been the backbone of this great country for centuries, has set us apart from other nations, and has shaped the course of American history. However, the first amendment freedom of religion is more difficult to protect in the classroom than the outside world. Two defining pieces of American history are the Supreme Court cases of both West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette of 1943 and Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District of 1967. In the 1943 case, the West Virginia State Board of Education required all students to salute the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. However, many of the students were Jehovah 's Witnesses and argued
Gun control laws affect citizens Second Amendment rights, right to self defense, and they have proven injustice. Guns can have many positive uses it is up to people to decide how they are used. There are many reasons why Gun control laws are questionable. The United States Constitution was created to establish American national government and give basic rights to citizens. The second Amendment of the U.S constitution states “The Right the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
The Bill of Rights is significant to American history because it guarantees certain rights and liberties of the people. Also without its creation the Anti-Federalists in 1787 wouldn’t have ratified the Constitution. Without ratification the Constitution would not have gone into effect. The Bill of Rights also guarantees that personal freedom would be broad and the power of the federal government is limited. Without the written rights the government could take them away.
For example, many Americans oppose the idea of same-sex marriage on religious grounds. Also, due to conservative beliefs many citizens have called for constitutional amendments considering marital union only between a man and a woman as appropriate (Fausset and Blinder, The NewYork Times.com). Just as Brian S. Brown, the president of the National Organization of Marriage stated the following in a New York Times Article “The millions of people who voted that marriage is a union of a man and a woman are not simply going to throw their beliefs away. This fight will continue on regardless of which way the Supreme Court rules” (Fausset and Blinder, The NewYork Times.com). Brown implies the notion of strong beliefs and values serving as chains holding back the proposal of an amendment to the
Does every American Citizen truly have civil rights? The idea that civil rights is something we as Americans have achieved have been mostly false, you can see this in many cases throughout the United States that some people or a whole race is being negated their basic rights as a Human either by the government itself or certain individuals. The United States has many great qualities such as freedom of speech, the right to vote, And the list goes on, but something which will take years and years to obtain would be civil rights of every citizen in the United States.A flaw that the United States haven’t been able to fix since the birth of this country is being able to give people of a different race equal rights as Americans and true Civil Rights. Many politicians have tried to make America a better place and always say that civil rights have
Exactly. Now, moving on. The second amendment statement is often used as the “oh the second amendment says its my right, i won’t give it up” statement when it comes to replying to anyone who tries and suggests stricter gun control laws. Personally, i find the whole guns for protection thing stupid. Guns are banned in so many countries and where i live is one of them.
The meaning of civil disobedience is a bit different in Henry Thoreau’s eyes. He explains civil disobedience as “that it is more important to develop respect for the right, rather than a respect for the law, for people’s obligations are to do what's right”. There are many different people who show civil disobedience in
For example, in our society, “it goes against the First Amendment that states that as Americans we have freedom of speech and freedom of press.”[Word Press] If the government were to implement censorship to our speech, as they do in Brave New World, (Mother, Father, etc out of vocabulary), it would be a violation of the amendments to the constitution which protect us from things like that happening. This would result in protests and chaos all around the nation. In democracies such as ours it has been shown that censorship is accepted only up to a certain extent, but to the extremes that they implement in Brave New World, would not be
To add, freedom of speech was very important to George Washington and he greatly influenced it being included. In 1783 he said, “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be lead, like sheep to the slaughter.” This reveals that freedom of speech is vital to the citizen’s rights. In 1534, the monarchs in England restricted what could be printed. Although we still have some restrictions of what content is allowed on the media, opinions, thoughts, and ideas can all be presented clearly through press. Lastly, freedom to assemble and to petition the government was added so that the government could not take away the citizen’s rights to assemble and petition, which was done in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party.
The Declaration of Independence was written for the American people. King George III had imposed a number of unwise regulations and the miserable acts so the American people did not want to follow under the rules. This document was to persuade the people to finally leave King George’s power so they could be under their own government with their own laws. Now saying that, a lot of people were not completely on board with this proclamation. During this time going against the King and his acts would make you guilty of treason.
There have been many controversies over the Tenth Amendment for quite some time. The amendment was designed to divide and limit the powers of the national and states’ government. It protects the states and its’ people from the national government becoming too powerful. However, the question that has been asked repeatedly and holds the most concern is, has the national government overstepped its power? The Tenth Amendment should be modified in favor of the states.
One example of our government compromising on the liberties in the bill of rights is freedom of speech. In concerns of the Bill of Rights, the term “freedom of speech” doesn’t really means the people are 100 % free to say whatever they want. If this was the case, most things would be very different. For instance, in the Washington Redskins trademark case, their name “Redskin” is offensive to Asian-Americans. Some of that race could take it in their consideration to sue this team for the provocative name.
onscription seems to violate some of the rights mentioned in both the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. The debated constitutionality of conscription has gone on for years because the practice is listed in the constitution. However, there is no max extent to conscription power leading to disagreements between citizens and the government about how the use of this practice can lead to the constraint of other constitutional rights. Our First Amendment guarantees citizens the Freedom of Religion. Imagine if a drafted individual’s religion was totally opposed to war of any kind.