The ratification of the constitution occurred between 1787-1789. Just prior to this, the colonists had defeated the French and Indians in the Seven Years War (a.k.a. French and Indian War), and immediately following the victory the British ended their salutary neglect towards the colonies and began to tax the the colonists in order to pay for the war. These events sparked a chain reaction that saw the colonists declare independence and defeat the British in the Revolution. This brings us to the constitutional convention whose task was to design a government for the people, by the people. The most contentious points of this convention involved the matters of political representation in the newly chosen bicameral legislative branch which spawned …show more content…
There were two proposed solutions. One was the New Jersey plan which sought to utilize a unicameral legislative branch in which each state would get one vote. The other proposed plan was the Virginia plan. The Virginia plan called for representation based on population with larger states having more representatives and smaller states having fewer. New Jersey plan was geared more towards Anti-Federalists, like Thomas Jefferson, who argued for fair representation of farmers, small business owners, and generally impoverished peoples, and also urged that a pure democracy be used. On the other hand, there were Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, who were mostly wealthy businessmen and politicians, who did not believe that the masses could effectively govern a nation. There was a bitter fight between the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists regarding the issue of representation, but in the end the bicameral legislative structure of the Virginia plan was mixed with the one vote per state, equal representation nature of the New Jersey plan. The House of Representatives would have representation based on population with slaves being counted as ⅗ of a person when counting population, while the senate would have equal representation regardless of population. But, this major issue was not the only obstacle the constitution …show more content…
The divide over political representation and the Bill of Rights did not end after the constitution was formed, rather the issues helped form two political parties: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. With George Washington as President and Alexander Hamilton as the Chief of Staff and Treasurer, the Federalists and their centralizing ideals were in control of the young government. Thomas Jefferson, a long time Hamilton opposer, formed the Democratic-Republican party as a opposition to Hamilton's Federalist party. The Federalists were considered loose-constructionists. They viewed what was written in the constitution as simply a template and that not everything was expressly written in the constitution. The Democratic-Republicans on the other hand, were strict constructionists. They preferred a very literal interpretation of the constitution. So, when Alexander Hamilton wanted to institute a national bank, Jefferson asked where it stated that he could do that and Hamilton pointed to the phrase “necessary and proper”. He felt that the bank was necessary to the success of the government, and with a pro-Federalist government it was created. Because both parties were polar opposites on almost every policy, there were disputes about everything. The Alien and Sedition acts for example were seen as unconstitutional because they infringed on the first amendment's right to free
The Virginia plan is a draft in the Article of Confederation, an proposal by James Madison. Because Virginia is such a large state, it needed 2 houses of the house of representatives to determined the proportions of the populations meaning there should only be House of Representatives with no Senate when it comes to decision making. On the other hand for the New Jersey Plan its the other way around, due to the smaller population of New Jersey, all representation where equal to other states. So for New Jersey plan there would be Senate but there wouldn't be any House of Representatives. To summarize the Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan, the Virginia would involve the House of Representatives but not Senate and for New Jersey plan
Final Exam Part I: QA2 The Virginia Plan a New Constitution The Virginia Plan proposed a new Constitution designed as a republic and a strong national government. The most distinguished feature of the plan created structural changes as well as delegated sovereignty to the Federal government and the people. This transfer of power diminished the role of the States in the national government. The Virginia Plan structurally replaced the unicameral Congress by separating federal power among three branches of government, a bicameral legislature, an executive and a judiciary.
As the Constitutional Congress were creating America’s new government from scratch, a problem came into their hands. They couldn’t decide whether to have equal representation or representation proportional (corresponding in size) to each state's’ population. Each of them either favored smaller or bigger states. Such as the Virginia Plan, this plan favored big states because it stated that the bigger the population, the more representatives they get. On the other hand, the New Jersey plan favored smaller states because it stated that no matter how big or small the population is, they get an equal amount of representatives.
The two plans put forth were the, “Virginia Plan” (which favored big states), and the “New Jersey Plan.” (which favored small states) Edmund Randolph of Virginia proposed the Virginia plan. The plan laid out a system in which states would be represented in the national legislature based on their population and/or by how much revenue
The Virginia plan presented in 1787 by Edmund Randolph was one option on how the United States should be governed. Their key points were for Congress to have 2 houses and for representation to be based on population. Another option was the New Jersey plan which was presented by William Paterson in the same year. This was to oppose the Virginia plan because not everyone agreed with what was written.
This rivalry among the Federalists and Anti-Federalists signified a controversial democracy which focused upon the national government consuming an amount of authority they should accept. Alexander Hamilton represented the Federalists as Thomas Jefferson represented the Anti-Federalists who promptly announced themselves the Democratic-Republicans. The Democratic-Republicans solicited power towards the state government considering they "believe" in an egalitarian civilization that would develop to preserve the individuals' preferences. However, the Federalists suppose that the state governments were exceedingly constitutional since it would lead to unfairness towards the "elites" moreover critical for the economy. The Anti-Federalists believes
The Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison favored the larger states for a two-house Congress to be based on each state’s population. This, of course, was argued about because small states felt as if they would not have enough voice. In disapproval to the Virginia Plan came the New Jersey Plan. This plan argued for a one house Congress, with equal representation. This meant that each state would have the same number of members.
Under the Articles of Confederation, each of the thirteen colonies was represented in Congress with one vote. When the framers created the Constitution, there were discussions surrounding whether each state should have votes proportional to the state’s population or should each state have equal representation. The larger states favored the Virginia Plan (which was based on population) because this would give them greater control in Congress. The smaller states were concerned about losing power in Congress so they supported the New Jersey Plan (which gave each state equal representation). After much debate over the two plans, a compromise was adopted that created a bicameral Congress.
The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who
In chapter two, American Government, may delegates were worried that their interests wouldn’t matter as much as larger states. The New Jersey Plan was created and they proposed for a unicameral legislative. Neither side one and was fair
The plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states. ”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.
198). This was known as the New Jersey Plan. In the text, Experience History, it states that this plan raised Congress’s power to tax and regulate trade, and kept national government a unicameral. Though it did not take long before the delegates rejected Paterson’s plan and going back to Madison’s plan. The problem with this plan was the idea of the seats being proportional to the states because some states were bigger than others (Davidson, et al., 2013, p. 198).
In the 1790s, there were two men who had different beliefs regarding how the United States should function. The two men were Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson was the leader of the Republican party and Hamilton was the leader of the Federalist party. The political parties were created by Hamilton and Jefferson based on their differences in opinion on how the country should run. For example, Jefferson believed that the government should be self-governed and all of the power should go to the individual states.
Obviously, smaller states were not pleased with that plan. They thought that larger states could easily overrule them in congress. So William Paterson created a plan called the New Jersey Plan. It as well had the same three branches but, the plan provided legislators to have only one house. Each state would only one vote in the legislator, regardless of the population.
In the creating of the US Constitution, the creators hit many roadblocks. It was difficult for the state delegates to decide on much, especially because they were biased and in favor of their own states. The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two examples of the disagreement of representation within the states in the legislative branch. The New Jersey Plan was in favor of equal representation throughout the states. The Virginia Plan was in favor of population representation, meaning the larger states would have more representation than the smaller states.