Ever since the 26th amendment was passed, eighteen year olds were allowed to vote. This new voting age led to this new age group showing less representation than older groups. It was then thought of in the Montgomery County to try and change this, so they lowered the voting age to sixteen. This new way of thinking was brought up to try and bring up the amount of young voters they see less of in elections. I support this new change because it seems like a good idea to let younger people have the chance to voice their opinions. This new change could lead to having more people interested in politics, it could also bring a bigger younger demographic of voters to vote, and it could bring a better representation of the opinions in the county. This …show more content…
Since the 26th amendment there was already a small number of young voters voting. This was commented on in the article where Shin states that “They typically go to the polls in much smaller numbers than their elders.” This has been a trend seen in about every election ever since the 26th amendment was made. They hope that this new age limit will bring a better connection to younger teens and get them into a habit of voting for the rest of their lives (Shin). There was a study done to show that after 21 days of doing an activity, it becomes a habit. Making this assumption is true about having them vote for the rest of their lives because they will be able to exercise this right many ways with local elections and being able to share their opinions with this new right. This goes to show that the Montgomery County is hopeful in the new change they are making. In the article Shin goes on to talk about Jessica Carpenter (Takoma City Clerk) and how she “estimates that about 90 16- and 17-year-olds have registered to vote.” Even though it is a small turnout of these new voters, it will bring a better understanding of opinions in the …show more content…
This is criticized against because opposers say that they “are thus likely to amplify the power of an already well-represented group.” This meaning that families may vote together on the same topics. This is untrue because in my family my dad voted for president Donald Trump and if I had the right to vote I would have voted for Secretary Hillary Clinton. I believed that what Donald Trump was saying was against what I believed and my dad felt the same way as Donald Trump. This goes to show that families or people assumed to have the same opinion don’t always agree on everything. Letting a new age group vote will help show the diversity that is among them. In the article Shin writes about how “some opponents said that young people barely old enough to drive a car don’t have enough perspective to vote.” This argument is valid because it is true that many young voters don’t have the experience to vote. It can still be undone by the fact that only informed individuals are willing to vote at such a young age. This is done through the fact that many young voters were prompted by this new right, to go out and seek the information needed to be well informed
Our group’s job was to propose a 28th Amendment to the constitution by making changes to article I section 8 and article II section 2 of the constitution. Article I section 8 of the constitution states that the congress has the power to declare war and raise and support armies. Article II Section 2 states that the president shall be the commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. We proposed that the Congress should have the option to elect a new commander in chief in case of an emergency or if the Congress feels that the president is not doing a decent job with the situation. We also proposed that the president should have the option to withdraw from the commander in chief position if there is an emergency in the country
US senate lowers voting age to 18 On March 10th, 1971, U.S senate lowered the voting age to 18. Richard Nixon was the senate who made a law on lowering the voting age to 18. He also made the 26th amendment stating, “The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.” Georgia was the first state to lower their voting age. A lot of teenagers started voting after this change was made.
In 1933, the 21st Amendment was ratified. It repealed the ban of the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors (a ban commonly called Prohibition) that had been put in place by the 18th Amendment. During Prohibition, the United States (U.S.) became nearly lawless, as crime rates skyrocketed and organized crime became very influential because the illegal alcohol trade was extremely profitable. After President Roosevelt was elected and took office in 1933, Prohibition was repealed. The 18th
Nowadays, the young generations are not aware of how important it is to go out to a poll and vote. Without the votes, voter turnout will continue to decline. The citizens should be more aware of what is going on, fight for their beliefs and issues, and make a
Every state set the age of suffrage that gives qualified person the right to vote. Country such as United States, Canada, and Great Britain, the minimum age limit is 18 years old. They are excluded from voting if they committed crimes, mentally incompetent and non-citizen residents such as guest workers. The most arguments regarding element of an electoral system is the rule for converting votes into seats.
The 26th amendment states “The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.” My opinion on the 26 amendment is that the voting age should be lowered to 16 instead of 18. I also believe the 2nd amendment should be change which also expresses “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Changing the 26th amendment could gradually increase society being safer. I feel the 26th amendment should be change because people of teenage years seem to know just as much about politics as much as older people.
Like Richard Nixon, I also feel like America’s new voters will always the key to our country’s brighter future. The younger generation of voters are not only more enthusiastic, but also have more of an understanding of what our continuously-evolving world needs. Based on their experiences, they know what type of government policies work and didn’t, and would also know the best types to solutions to fix this problem. I think that voting is extremely important factor to maintain a functional democracy and is a great way to figure out what our people need. I feel like our government should increase the voting turnout by not only making the voting registration process easier, but also by publicizing and educating the American people about local
This unfamiliarity and thought of the process being confusing deters the younger people from registering to vote in the first place. By removing this process, voters can just show up to cast their votes and move on with their day without worrying about this potentially confusing process. These three methods combined could increase the voter turnout for each
When you turn 18 you are now a legal adult and have the right to vote. I know that ever since i was a little kid, I thought it was so facinating that my parents got to go and write their vote down on a piece of paper and vote for the president of the United States. In a small town, change is scary. Everyone likes things to stay just like they always have been, expecialy the older people. I agree that everyone should be able to vote, and it is unfair to those who have disabilities.
Many people believe 16-17 year olds are too young to vote, but they already have tons of responsibilities, they should be able to vote as well. The voting age should be lowered to 16 because it will benefit them in many ways such as them being able to speak their minds, it’s more democratic, and it will give politicians a reason to respect young people. First, lowering the voting age will give teens the right to speak their minds. They will have a say in who they think should win an election, as well as everyone else.
Imagine how the world would be in the future if sixteen year olds had the chance to vote. Things would be way more easier for them and others in the long run. Teens will already have that experience of voting early then what it use to be. Sixteen is a better age to introduce voting than the age now 18, 16 year olds are more active and smart. Teens today are competent enough to choose the next leader of their country.
The voting age should be lowered to 16 because youth will vote thoroughly, 16 is a better age to start voting, and voting will provide an intrinsic benefit to the lives of young people. Firstly, it is best for us to lower the voting age because young adults will vote thoroughly and make the right decisions. Alternet says that young voters are likely to vote in much the same way as their parents, not because they are coerced to do so but because or shared values meaning that there will be no worries that irresponsible teenagers will make wrong choices. National
It’s quite an absurd claim that at 16, we’re still children. At the age of 18, we’re considered to be an “adult”, and yet the real test of adulthood is at 21, where you get full rights to things such as drinking and smoking. People also ignore the fact that we are seemingly supposed to be conscious and plan out what we want to do with our lives at the age of 13-14. Nobody knows adamantly what job they want in the future, nobody knows what their education in school and college will put them through and by the time they’re 16, it’s too late to change what you want to study, we’ll just be wasting years of our lives. We have to decide our future at the age of 14 but vote is a no-no?
Abstract This argumentative essay tries to shade light on whether the voting age should be lowered to sixteen. The paper discusses the reasons for lowering the age of electoral majority of sixteen as well as the opposing views and counterarguments. It also considers numerous arguments that have been raised by both sides of the debate about lowering the voting age to sixteen. The claim that is being presented in this paper is about the political maturity of people aged sixteen years.
I think if our country keeps the voting age at 18 there won't be that much voters because lowering the voting age would decrease the percentage of participation. Also in 1948, 51% of voters participated, our goal is to increase this percentage. If they would let people vote at home it would increase the percentage. Most of the younger voters do not care to vote at all.