4th Amendment Essay On Warrants

The principle explains that police should use only the amount of physical force necessary to restore order and protect public if using warning or persuasion is not working on an individual. This is important because it is not ok for anyone to use physical force in not completely necessary. If using physical force is not required, then it should always be avoided. Although, if an officer must use physical force than it should be the least amount necessary to protect the individual and surrounding public. For modern police officers this an important principle, this is not always followed and not following this principle causes many unnecessary tragedies and conflicts.

Another issue with the Constitution requiring warrants, are police investigations being delayed. Like said before, warrants are not created right away and need time to be issued. Also under old law a new warrant were to be issued for each investigation even on the same person. Within all of this extra time criminals are able to hide any type of evidence there might be and do whatever it is to remain not guilty, only making it harder for the police and government to investigate or collect evidence. Surveillance and other investigations not only need warrants but judicial oversight that also takes time away from police investigating.

Officer Safety There may be conflict inside the police culture. By placing citizen complaints under the category of unbecoming an officer, which covers many things (e.g., appearance, tone of voice, gestures, comments), police administration needs no further evidence to find a trooper guilty of a violation. The end result is that troopers may second guess their actions during critical situations in fear of receiving a complaint. The results may be fatal.

Despite this level of awareness, police officers who receive calls that report a cybercrime are rarely qualified to investigate and understand technology to the extent that justice is achieved for the individual. State police officers frequently try to throw cybercrimes at the hands of federal police because they not wanting to be the first responders . The community expects police officers to do their job perfectly or at least try to do so because when they fail to investigate an electronic crime, the rights of many of the victims will surely be lost because the police have not done their duty to protect the rights of individuals. The solution to this problem is that the state should start the training and development of officers' skills, or at least some of them so that they can protect citizens from losing their rights

Facing deportation due to local felony in

With this in mind, the readings of Adventures of the Dork Police by Michael Gardner, he provided that as a retired police officer he use to use verbal persuasion tactics rather than physical force in conflict resolution. Using these tactics can lead to a positive or negative outcome but, then again using these tactics should be first. In the police force, the other officers disliked visiting domestic calls because they are very dangerous. As an experiment his partner and himself went to go take care of those issues.

There are certain situations where law enforcement do not need a warrant for an arrest or search. Some situations include, “searches incident to arrest, searches based on consent, inventory searches, and emergency searches may be conducted without warrants.” (Ingram, 2009, P.167) When law enforcement has probable cause that a defendant for armed assault is hiding in a third person’s garage, a search warrant may be obtained to allow law enforcement access to the private property. But, since law enforcement has probable cause they also may enter the property

I don 't get it: you can 't be pregnant and stopped by police, you can 't be old and stopped by police, you can 't be a kid and stopped by police. Since I enjoy taking it in the pooper does that give me a free pass to commit a crime? I follow this simple little rule "if I don 't want LEO interaction I don 't break the law". It 's worked really well

If a crime is reported to police it is usually dismissed due to a lack of evidence. Many instances of sexual assault are often labeled as "unfounded" by police, meaning the police disregard the report as hearsay since there was insufficient evidence to convict an attacker(Doolittle, 2017). Usually, the cases labeled unfounded ( after being reviewed by police) found no violation against the law. The Uniform Crime Reporting Survey (UCR) (an overview of sexual assaults compiled by police) does not include cases of unfounded sexual assault as they are either unreliable and create discrepancies regarding reporting(Rotenburg, 2017). 1 in every 5 cases of sexual assault are regarded as unfounded according to the National Policing Data(Doolittle, 2017).

Continue about your everyday life. Don’t brag about your crime to anyone. Don’t tell a soul. If you do get arrested, you have the right to remain silent use it. The police need evidence to convict you, but if you have done the job right, there won’t be

(Cathy Lanier) and New York City suggested that citizens should take action to defend themselves if faced with a similar attack OTHER - Taking away guns does not actually drop the crime/murder rate - Most people who misuse handguns and do harmful acts with them are buying them illegally and do not have a concealed handgun license - Owning a handgun can protect the citizen when the police are unable to always be relied on - The right to own guns should not be taken away from everyone, including those who don’t misuse them, but rather only from those that do - Guns aren’t the issue it’s the people who use them wrongfully - Stopping the black market for guns will do more justice than taking them all away - Criminals will still use some form of weapon even if its not a gun so why not allow guns for people with concealed handgun licenses to protect themselves and others COUNTERS - Counter argument 1: More guns allow for more suicides? Yes people may choose to use a gun if they have access to one, for example in their house, but if someone is seriously going to commit suicide they will find another form or way to do it… guns don’t promote it or make it more

Police officers should not receive special treatment since they do not respect the law, but they take advantage of

For example, if the Miranda Rights didn 't exists 100

The person who is getting arrested must remain silent during the arrest and as well as being in the police car. Police are supposed to say this during an arrest because whatever the person says can be used against them in the court of law. The right to remain silent means people do not have to talk while something is taking place. After the police say this they tell the person what it means and why they tell them this. When they tell people this it means they are reading the person their rights to them.

In today’s world, unless you call and ask for help, the police are not your friend. Police in 2015 is around to decide if you’ve done something wrong and whether they can arrest you or not to “maintain order” in the community. When you get pulled over by a police you should follow three simple rules. The first rule is to always be courteous and polite to the cop. The second rule is to resist every request of the police until he uses force.