For several decades, government officials and healthcare experts have been discussing the broken and dysfunctional US healthcare system. The US ranks highest for cost and lowest for outcomes. Healthcare accounted for 17.4 percent of the gross domestic product in 2013 (CMS.gov). The Institute for Healthcare Improvement highlighted the quality of healthcare in the US or lack of quality with the 100,000 lives campaign. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement brought national attention and awareness to the epidemic of hospital errors and the loss of life related to those errors. One would expect that amount of money the US spends on healthcare to equate to great patient care and reduction of patient mortality, however, that is not …show more content…
The Affordable Care Act consists of the ten sections including Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans, Role of Public Programs, Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care, Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health, Health Care Workforce, Transparency and Program Integrity, Improving Access to Innovative Medical Therapies, CLASS Act, Revenue Provisions, and Strengthening Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans (Fontenot, 2013). The Affordable Care Act aims to reduced the number of uninsured Americans by mandating all citizens have health insurance either through private insurance coverage or increasing access to public insurance coverage. The reduction of uninsured in theory should reduce the cost of healthcare. Prior to The Affordable Care Act, the burden of cost associated with the uninsured was shifted to the physicians, hospitals, and consumers. HHCAPS or value-based reimbursement should improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare. Healthcare providers who fail to demonstrate improvement in quality and efficiency will be penalized by two percent for each reporting year that they do not comply with the standard of care and quality standards imposed by CMS. Failure to pay for healthcare acquired conditions will also demonstrate a …show more content…
1201). The expected physician and nursing shortage will impact access to healthcare. It is unclear how The Affordable Care Act will impact the current and future shortage of physicians and nurses. The aging population is contributing to the shortage of healthcare providers. Limited nursing school faculty is impacting the nursing shortage. Many nursing schools in the US have waiting list to begin their programs secondary to lack of faculty. The average age of a nurse in the US is now around mid 40s to early 50s. Many of these nurses are expected to retire during the peak of the nursing shortage. The Affordable Care Act has some built in incentives to encourage physicians who provide primary care, which has been shown to lower mortality and increase life expectancy (Davis et al., 2011). Medical schools have reported increased enrollment
This question represents at least half of the medical community, and makes people question the intended and unintended consequences in a profit - driven health care system, the supposition of quality health today, and whether they
Summary of “The American Healthcare Paradox” “The American Health Care Paradox” focuses on health care and how the United States is suffering compared to their peer countries. The United States has spent billions of dollars in health care and the problem is still growing. The government is responsible for not following or ignoring the issue that we suffered with, in today’s society the healthcare system is failing drastically. The health care system has been a problem for several decades now, even though it seems that things are getting better it’s not.
What is Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010? What is ACA’s contribution to health care reform? The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a federal statute signed into law in 2010, that is designed to increase access to health insurance, expand Medicaid eligibility, subsidize health insurance premiums, and provide incentives for businesses to provide health care beneﬁts (Marco et al., 2012). ACA is a law that levels the playing field for all American to have access to health insurance.
In addition to the dismay of many healthcare professionals, patients, and citizens who are uninsured, several flaws about the current healthcare system show the necessity for reform. The three flaws that exacerbate the current healthcare crisis are: the tax code and tax breaks, the lack of preventable care and adequate care of chronic diseases, and administrative costs. A single payer, universal healthcare system can resolve the major flaws of the
ACA prohibits discrimination against anyone with preexisting conditions, dropping coverage if you become sick, and limiting your annual or lifetime benefits. Millions of uninsured will get access to affordable high quality health insurance. In order to get money to insure uninsured, net taxes are placed mostly on high earners and the health care industry. (obamacarefacts) The Affordable Care Act will help to improve the well-being and incomes of Americans by increasing coverage and lowering costs of health insurance, helping the rate of uninsured go down.
The law that was intended to improve the status quo of health care has, in essence, caused a dangerous paradigm shift in health care costs. Fundamentally, the Affordable Care Act is a failed attempt to reduce health care costs in the United States. The Act was designed to increase affordability of health insurance for extremely low-income families; nevertheless, the Act exponentially increased health insurance costs for the majority of Americans. In America, majority rules-- why should health care be an
The expansion of Medicaid through the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has initiated many states to try innovative ideas to improve their Medicaid programs. Many states, like Minnesota, had started the reform process prior to the passage of the ACA with the purpose of improving the quality of care for Medicaid beneficiaries and to utilize a more cost-effective system to provide Medicaid benefits. One of the innovative ideas that states like Minnesota is implementing is the use of accountable care organizations (ACOs). This paper will explore ACOs by studying the reforms within the Minnesota Medicaid program. Background Medicaid was originally established by the government to provide medical services and payment for individuals
It is designed to cut costs for healthcare in the United States. This act also helped uninsured Americans receive health insurance The act helped “high risk” Americans to get health insurance. This act also let the government control the costs and quality of care (Weiner 1). This reduction to healthcare costs was to be done many different ways, which included many different types of models and tax increases.
Furthermore, there should be a more reasonable distribution of cost amongst Americans, with younger and healthier Americans assuming some of the financial burden for those less healthy. Another goal of the ACA is to stabilize the skyrocketing cost of health care. One way to stabilize cost can be accomplished by reforming the way payment and reimbursement of services occurs—outcomes versus volume. A final goal of the Affordable Care Act is to provide incentives that reward wellness and preventative medicine (Panning,
The Affordable Care Act: Bad For Some, Great For Millions For sometime, many US citizens have not had the resources to acquire an adequate health insurance plan. Although faced by many oppositions, the US government has found a solution, The Affordable Care Act. The Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare”, is a US healthcare reform law that focuses mainly on providing more Americans with access to an affordable health insurance. The Affordable Care Act is said to expand the affordability, quality, and availability of private and public health insurance through consumer protections, regulations, subsidies, taxes, insurance exchanges, and other reforms. Signed into law by President Obama in March 2010, hence the nickname “Obamacare”, the
Many Americans were led to believe that the introduction of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2009 would put an end to disparities in health care access. While it did improve the situation for a small percentage of the population there are still many Americans who lack access to good quality health care. Health care access in America is determined by money and those in lower socioeconomic groups frequently tend to miss out on adequate care. In a recent health care report by the national health research foundation Kaiser Family Foundation, it was noted “health care disparities remain a persistent problem in the United States, leading to certain groups being at higher risk of being uninsured, having limited access to care, and experiencing poorer quality of care” (Kaiser Family Foundation). The current health care
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
Since the late 1980s, there has been thought that a health system can save money when it systematically raises the quality of care provided has been a driving force behind the quality improvement movement. This was the collateral benefit of better patient outcomes which result in lowered rehospitalization rates, fewer clinician office visits, and improved patient risk status. There is a multifaceted affiliation between expense and quality in the United States healthcare system. The United States spends more on health care per capita than any other country (Sawyer and Cox, 2018). Data demonstrate that the elevated healthcare expenditure in the United States is unconvincingly associated with quality of care.
Health insurances can benefit by saving millions of dollars in health care cost that are spent on wrong treatments for patients. Instead, insurances should focus on hospitals providing quality patient care service