Alexander The Great Dbq Analysis

Alexander the Great was a major world conquerer, who controlled over 22 million square miles of land by the end of his journey. He was born in Macedonia as Philip II’s son in 356 BC and became king of Macedonia when he turned 20, after his fathers death. When he was king first he ended the Theban revolt and enslaved all the people to set an example for what would happen if you rebelled against Alexander. Then he set out to conquer the rest of the world until his death in 323 BC. People today argue whether he is a hero or a villain, but he is a villain because he was cruel to every one of his enemies, he became extremely power hungry, and mercilessly killed people.

Alexander the Great did not deserve his tittle as great because he gained power by fear, killed innocent people, and his empire did not stay together long. Alexander the Great started conquering land at the age of 20, and in the process killed thousands of innocent people, used a fear tactic to gain his power, and built a massive empire that did not last very long. Some may see him as great, but if you look a little closer at the details Alexander did more harm then good trying to unite everybody. In conclusion, these three factors are proof that Alexander was not as excellent as historians try to prove him to

Alexander 's father, King Philip was in charge of Macedonia, until he was murdered. Alexander became king as a teenager. Alexander was born on July 20, 356 BC in Pella, Macedon. He died on June 10, 323 BC in Babylon. Alexander was known for conquering a great deal of land in Asia and Europe. He got a lot of his mindset from his parents and Achilles, his mentor and trainer. Have you ever wondered what makes people a hero or villain? Alexander was the king of Macedonia. He conquered millions of square miles of land in Asia and Europe. Alexander The Great was a villain because he killed for pleasure, did cruel and unnecessary tasks, and left the government undeveloped. Alexander was villain because he killed for pleasure. Alexander scared Durias

Alexander the Great is a villain because murdered and tortured innocent people and took over civilizations against their free will. Alexander killed for his selfish reasons and took land that did not belong to him. He took many people’s lives, tourchered and embarrassed them if they did not obey him or surrender. Alexander the Great was great in his mind, but was not-so-great in

Alexander the Great was a villain because he refused to appoint an heir before he died. As king, it is custom that if a king were to unexpectedly die, he should appoint an heir, or someone to take his place as king. Alexander, however, did not appoint an heir and denied that he would die. According to Live Science “As Alexander the Great lay on his deathbed in 323 B.C., his generals reportedly asked to whom he left his empire. "To the strongest," Alexander said, according to historians.” (1) This proves that Alexander is villainous because he never appointed an actual king but rather made the generals fight

Alexander Wanted what was good for the cause of America. He tried to end most slavery and protect the now unslaved slaves. Hamilton stayed loyal to his fellow Americans that he fought within the war and battles, Alexander never was a trader it wasn’t in his personality. He was also a extremely smart man he wrote lots of papers and worked in different organizations. He even stayed in the army when George and and him got into a little disagreement and resigned, ALexander just went to serve in a different part of the Army. He never ever gave up on trying to gain freedom for America. He created a financial base for the Americans when he became Secretary of Treasury. He also kept trying his best to get Aaron Burr out of the election for governors, Aaron Challenged Hamilton to a duel and shot him. Alexander died the next day at the age of 47 years old. Would you die for your

First of all, one reason that Alexander was great was because he was a military genius. He was a genius because he conquered so much land and did not stop. In document B it states, “That Alexander made a plan to trick Porus by acting like he was going over the river by making

Alexander III of Mutarch is a man known to be “Great,” but is that really so? Alexander was born in Macedonia, and he took charge of Macedonia at the age of 16 when his father left for an expedition. Although Alexander may have done some good deeds during his sovereignty for his people, it definitely does not outweigh the bad deeds he did to other people. Alexander received the name “Great” undeservingly because he did not exhibit examples of a good leader which should be one who is nonviolent, rational, and unselfish.

Alexander the Great is a villain because killed a lot of people. People who kill other people for really no reason are villains. Alexander killed many people just because they did something little to his civilization. According to TCI “Philip wanted to attack Persia next, but, in 336 B.C.E., he was murdered. His son, Alexander, was the new Macedonian king.” (TCI the last section). A website states that Alexander murdered his dad (Cite in Bibliography). Alexander wanted to be king but he didn’t have to kill your dad for the spot. Alexander got king when he was 20 and people say he was great for that but really he just killed his dad that was king to get the spot for king and that 's just selfish. Alexander the great

Alexander was not a great king. He was one of the worst tyrants to ever live. Killing hundreds of thousands of people just for some land. He was a blood hunger tyrant and he should have never got the name of “great”. He stipe d people of their cultural identity for some

Alexander was great because he has accomplished many things at such a young age. He did things people could only dream about. He was an excellent strategist and an inspired leader to many. “Alexander... build a causeway or land bridge, of timber and rubble so his soldiers could cross from the mainland to the island…’and Tyrian counterattacks caused Alexander to lose many men… ‘In the end, however, the causeway was completed and Alexander’s army smashed into the city.” Since his teacher was Aristotle, this shows he was taught well and he is a great problem solver. Even though Alexander was faced with my challenges throughout his journey he knew how to out think them. He tricked Porus and his elephants when he was conquering India. The way he

Alexander the Great is one of the most famous people in our world’s history. He achieved great challenges no other man could do. Alexander himself said, “There is nothing impossible to him who will try.” His achievments prove this quote without a doubt. Alexander of Macedon was born in 356 BCE to King Philip and his wife Olympia. His parents hired the philosopher Aristotle to educate Alexander in subjects such as politics, sports, and warfare. He grew a strong opinion of himself as the outcome of his education. He then concluded to the belief that he was a god. When Alexander’s father died, he inherited his army and his quest to conquer Persia. He successfully lead the army through the Persian Empire and conquered thousands of square miles

Alexander the Great showed leadership during his time as King of Macedonia. The map in Document A shows how Alexander had defeated strong Persian resistance and conquered much of Asia, labeling each of his new found cities Alexandria. His strong leadership skills led him to many more successes as well. Alexander the Great built his empire in 11 years and founded 70 new cities (Document E). This evidence support how Alexander

Ten days after he developed a sickness, Alexander died without leaving an heir to the throne. This caused an argument among his generals to fight over who would get what portion of the land (Background Essay). However, according to the chart titled “Alexander’s Legacy,” the fighting and poor leadership among them caused the empire to crumble a short ten years following Alexander’s death (Document E). Alexander’s empire, which was two million square miles at the time of his death (almost the size of the Roman empire), fell apart because of Alexander’s poor planning and lack of political finesse (Document E). This shows that Alexander had little skill as a political leader, which kept his empire on the brink of falling at any moment. Alexander also didn’t think of the future of his people because he hadn’t even thought of the idea of leaving someone to take over his empire after he died, displaying his lack of concern for others and political

When Alexander and his men were marching across the army, his men gave him a helmet full of water specifically for him. “Alexander, with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and, in full view of his troops, poured the water on the ground.” (Doc D). Alexander also allowed many cities to surrender without a fight, and treated the cities that did rather kindly (Doc C). Alexander pouring the water explains why he was great because even though his men had given him water, he refused to drink it, for his men were just as thirsty as he was. Allowing the cities to surrender explains why he was great because it shows that he wasn’t a harsh leader that just seizes control, he lets the city decide to surrender in return for kindness.