ipl-logo

Alexander The Great Research Paper

445 Words2 Pages

Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas. One of Alexander’s first military feats was the battle against the Macedonians and the Thebans. The Thebans were bitter about the treatment they had received from Alexander’s father, Phillip. Phillip had held Thebans prisoners and even executed some of them. So when Alexander became the new Macedonian king after his late …show more content…

The greatest example of this feat is Alexandria. Alexandria was in Egypt, a place that Alexander had previously conquered. Before Alexander left Egypt after his conquest, he marked off the boundaries for a city near the Nile River. He named this city Alexandria, after himself. This city was intrigued many people, including General Ptolemy 1 who moved his capital to Alexandria from Memphis and made it both a commercial port and a huge cultural center. Alexandria is considered to be the best example of ALexander's successful spreading of Greek Culture. Alexander may have been somewhat known as a big-headed, narcissistic leader, so much so as to going as far as to say that he was the son of Zeus, the King of the Gods. But Alexander truly did deserve the title of “The Great”. To be great in history is not to be a nice, sweet person who is kind to everyone, but to be a smart ruler who knows what he wants and gets what he wants. To be great in history is a title that comes with a lot of speculation, but Alexander The Great deserves none. This young Macedonian King was truly

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander killed an estimated of 100,000 enemy soldiers, and innocent civilians throughout his rein. (Doc. E). He killed all these people just because he wanted more land to gain more power. Most of these people did nothing to Alexander and had no affect on his life except they were an obstacle in the way of him gaining more power. Also Alexander killed a full army in East India because he saw a major opportunity to take control of land from one of the biggest empires.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Plutarch, a historian, stated that “When he came to Thebes, … the city … was sacked and razed. Alexander’s hope being that so severe an example might terrify the rest of Greece into obedience,”. This shows us an example of Alexander’s logic of how he took power which is not rational and peaceful in any way. Alexander should have tried to gain the trust of Thebes instead of terrifying them into his

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

Consequent to his death, Alexander the Greats empire that he built ruptured into three separate kingdoms, these kingdoms later broke into more smaller states. However, even though Alexander’s kingdom did not last long, his influence did. Alexander the Great formed a huge empire, which spread Greek culture into Egypt and many parts of Asia, and paved the way for new civilizations to develop. Alexander encouraged blending of cultures in areas he conquered, created new cities for example, Alexandria in Egypt. Alexander encouraged people from other parts of the empire to move to these cities and lastly, Cultural Diffusion led to the formation of Hellenistic Culture blending of Greek, Persian, Egyptian, and Indian cultures.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander III of Macedonia inherited an empire that included the kingdom of Macedonia and the city-states of Greece. He was a very cruel and harsh leader. Almost immediately, Alexander set out to conquer the Persian Empire. He achieved his dream when he was 30 but then died a few years later. Alexander is one of the most famous people in history.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Describe the steps that Alexander the Great and his mother took to ensure his rise to power. Alexander and his mother took many steps to ensure his power as king of Macedonia. One of the first steps he took was to have a great education. Secondly, Alexander may have gotten his father killed by his bodyguard.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander was not great I think that Alexander was not great. In my opinion Alexander was not very great at all. He may have had some pretty amazing accomplishments but that does not mean he was great at what he does or how he did it and it for sure does not mean he was a great person by any means. The evidence that I will be using is Alexander 's Empire, The Destruction of Tyre, and Alexander 's Legacy.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Glorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

Most ancient rulers are called ‘The Great’ because they are the first in their family to rule. However, Alexander the Great was not the first in his family to rule yet he still received the title. Although he was only ruler of the empire for twelve years, he was still a great leader and earned the title he has now because in that time he deployed new technologies and equipment which helped him expanded the empire to as big as it ever was and defeat the Persians as well as many others. There are some people that disagree and don’t think he earned this title but others do think he was truly a great leader. He improved and strengthened the army he inherited from his father and treated them with respect.

Read More
407 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander the Great did a lot of good things but I do not think that he is so great. I think he was ok but he also mad some bad decisions and could go crazy at any time, so you would not know when to expect it. My opinion about him is that he’s not great because he enslaved 20,000 innocent women and children and he got drunk, which caused many deaths.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

In order to claim and conquer his position towards the Greek city-states, he completely destroyed Thebes which resulted in a riot of angry citizens towards Alexander. One of the main concerns on Alexander’s mind was to conquer Persia (Freeman). He defeated and conquered many territories before he was able to reach the Great King of Persia, Darius, whom was murdered later on. In the two battles at Issus and Gaugamela, Alexander and his men remained victorious while he also was able to conquer Babylon, Egypt and Phoenicia.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

But, everyone has accomplishments, accomplishments much like Alexander's, and even greater. So, why does he deserve the title of “the great”? The simple answer is that he does not. He did make accomplishments, and he did evolve and further Greek culture, but he can do all of that without “the great” added to the end of his name. Much like Van-Gough, no one perceived Alexander as great until after he was dead.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More
2020 Words | 9 Pages

“I would rather live a short life of glory than a long life of obscurity” - Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was a former king of Macedonia who lived from 356 BCE - 326 BCE, growing the small Greek Kingdom of Macedon into the great Macedonian Empire, one of the largest empires the world had ever seen. Educated by Aristotle and succeeding his father as the king of Macedon at the age of 20, Alexander had his sights set on achieving greatness. Within 12 years, Alexander had conquered the former Persian Empire, the entirety of the ancient Kingdom of Egypt, as well as parts of Central Asia and India, securing the loyalty and admiration of his subjects throughout the empire. Although Alexander died at the young age of 32 before he could further

Read More

More about Alexander The Great Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document