Esports are in limbo when it comes to recognition and reputation. Any media can hurt the growth of the community if there is misinformation. The article “An NCAA for Esports? Rivals Angle to Govern Campus Video Gaming,” by Zach Schonbrun addresses the disorder of esports on the collegiate level. The NCAA, the association unanimous with collegiate sports, has been hesitant on action when it comes to including them in their roster of sports. In its stead, independent companies rose to aid college esports. These organizations seek to replace the NCAA and they have helped the community grow. They point out their flexibility to current esports regulations, whereas the NCAA current rules would cause many structural changes within esports. The author …show more content…
The author portrays the NCAA as a controlling system with little empathy in contrast to other organizations. When comparing the NCAA to the CEO of Electronic Gaming Federation or EGF, Tyler Schrodt, the author describes the NCAA as “bureaucratic” but the author describes Schrodt as being “antithetical” of the NCAA based on his looks. Bureaucratic has a negative connotation; that the NCAA are unfeeling to those who have to appeal to them. Schrodt on the other hand is caring for the esports players. The author uses negative adverbs and adjectives to describe the NCAA. It “lagged” behind in accepting esports and its framework may be “antiquated” and “obdurate” were used to describe the NCAA actions and regulations. Lagged connotes reluctance and laziness. Antiquated and obdurate connote old and unopened to new ideas for change. This is in heavy contrast to the language used to describe other organizations. When speaking on the compatibility of new companies taking the place of the NCAA, the independent companies give “tailored-made governance” to collegiate esports. This implies that the solution led by EGF and NACE is …show more content…
It does not mention specific board members and the opinions held thereof, but assumes the NCAA upholds its actions unilaterally. In comparison, EGF, organized in a similar business style, differentiates between its higher ups. The author separates Schrodt and Rockie Hunter, partner of Schrodt, though both would weigh in on the actions of the company. When addressing a whole group as one entity, it eliminates any sort of dissent that might be there. It has given the NCAA only one perspective with no objection by an internal party. Contrasting, when introducing Schrodt, it addresses him as “chief executive” rather than a CEO. Chief executive comes off as less pretentious and on the same socioeconomic as the reader. This makes him more relatable to both the reader and the players. Furthermore, Michael Brooks is identified as the first executive director of NACE but also as the a former member of the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics. Classifying a lead competitor of the NCAA as having a background in college athletics builds his ethos. Rhetorically, he is more appealing to the audience. Non-NCAA groups are classified in a positive light versus identification of a single mindedness of the
For many years now, the National Football League’s economic status has remained a main focal point within the economic community. The National Football League is the highest level of professional football in the United States and one of the most prominent organizations amid worldwide professional sports. Many people within the business community argue as to whether or not the National Football League is truly a powerful modern day monopoly or cartel. “How They Gained Monopoly Power” written by Brent Tuchner and Andrew Goldberg address the argument of both parties.
Amatuer, is that a verb that accuratly describes the modern day billion dollar industry that is collegiate sports? The NCAA insists that it does; saying that collegiate sports is not, and should never be, considered a business. Contrary to the implication of the NCAA collegiate sports, specifically men’s football and basketball, have over the recent years hauled in a yearly revenue similar to that of the NBA. But, unlike the Professional league of the NBA; Collegiate “student-athletes” specifically men’s football and basketball players lack the compensation for their services that NBA players get. The implication that collegiate sports are amatuer are false, due to the implementation of “ big business” in the NCAA and Colleges and Universities
When describing the NCAA in contrast to the CEO of Electronic Gaming Federation or EGF, Tyler Schrodt, he describes the NCAA as bureaucratic
After the Milan High School victory, eight teams have made it to the Final Four. These teams are Springs Valley High School in 1958, Tell City High School in 1961, Cloverdale High School in 1966, Loogootee High School in 1970 and 1975, Argos High School in 1979, Shenandoah High School in 1981, Southridge High School in 1985, and Whitko High School in 1991 (“One-Class…”). Loogootee’s 1975 team made it to championship game; but, no small, current A or 2A, school won the championship after Milan High School (Johnson). Just as state champions change each year, so does tournament attendance. In 1960, the total series attendance was 1,497,674.
Similar to Harmon (2020)’s argument that large companies and organizations take advantage of the CFP and take its money, Goodman (2021) asserts that underdogs will help reduce corruption. According to Harmon, a team in a power 5 conference has an increased chance of making it into the playoffs. This is because if a team who is not in a power 5 conference gets selected over the team who is, the major companies and organizations who support the power 5 conferences will scare the CFP committee by threatening to not give them money to fund for the playoffs. These companies support the power 5 conferences because of their fame and the significantly large amount of viewers they get on national television. Goodman provides a plan that is simple, yet difficult to execute.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association Introduction The National Collegiate Athletic Association also known as the NCAA is an organization that is committed to preparing student-athletes to succeed in skills educationally, on the playing field and throughout their life. Members of the NCAA are usually colleges and universities, but it also includes conferences and associated groups. History 1906 1910 1921 1939 1952 1973 1978 1983 1984 2010
With the revenue quickly escalating, college athletes appear more as employees because of the money they are generating for their school program (Berry III,
College football, as an “amateur” sport, produces nearly $3.5 billion dollars a year, but the young men who play the game, primarily African American, don’t see a penny of revenue. Yes, student athletes get tuition, room and board, and lots of Nike, Adidas or Under Armour gear, but they’re really free labor. The world refers to them as “student athletes,”. There are three different levels of competition under the NCAA. Division I, Division II and Division III are the three levels associated with the NCAA.
One of the key differences between the AIAW and the NCAA is that women’s sports is represented by the AIAW and men’s sports is represented by NCAA. Another key differences between AIAW and the NCAA would be the money and status that the NCAA has over the AIAW. According to Grundy & Rader both authors stated “But the NCAA had two things the AIAW could not hope to match: money status. The AIAW had a $1 million budget. The NCAA, with its lucrative television contracts, had $20 million”.(Grundy & Rader p.245).
A Rhetorical Analysis of “The Education of Dasmine Cathey” Writer, Brad Wolverton, in his article “The Education of Dasmine Cathey” first appearing in The Chronicle of Higher Education, conveys the journey of a former University of Memphis football player who was poorly educated and how he struggled to be academically eligible. Wolverton’s purpose is to illustrate the widespread of educational shortcomings of NCAA athletes and the complicated ways athletes struggles gets brushed under the proverbial carpet. (Wolverton) In this article Wolverton utilizes a straightforward tone by using pathos to appeal to the readers with Mr. Cathey’s difficult situation also utilizing logos and ethos etc. to help make a presentable argument to which I will be analyzing.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
Trusted Board Members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association check on colleges very often to inspect recruitment plans along with other things to make sure no Division One football program was making illegal
Ty Mason Ms.Shasteen Engl 1302 13 February 2023 NIL NIL is one of if not the most highly debated topics in the college sports world. While its incorporation in the college world initially came with much applause the applause has quickly faded as flaws and problems pop up. Despite its flaws, incorporating NIL into the college world presents an opportunity to achieve meaningful reform that could help revolutionize college sports and benefit student-athletes across America. Leaving the NCAA along with its players and universities. NIL’s main criticism is how it has punished lower-tier schools for not having the same financial backing that larger schools have.
Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.
Relating this concept to athletics seems a bit perplexing at first, since government and sports usually do not go hand in hand. But in order to display bureaucracy’s influential role in athletics, it is vital to understand where the connection even began. Following the Civil War, structural hierarchy and commanding order pierced through much of the nation, allowing for expansion, development, and efficiency. As this bureaucratic type culture continued to envelop much of America, the structure and development of sports followed shortly thereafter. In an article by Barrie Houlihan, he states the emergence of bureaucracy in sport has been the product of the same forces that promoted it in work and other areas of society, namely the growth in size of administrative units, the development of a money economy, the increase in occupational specialism, and the dominance of the profit principle.