Changing History Here in the recent years, it has been discovered many times that some of our favorite heroes, such as Paul Revere and John Smith, have lied or have had false claims made towards their actions. Take Revere for example; a poem was written about his midnight ride during the 1860’s, when our country was falling apart due to the Civil War. This poem took all the credit from the 40 plus people who rode that night and gave it to Paul. The question is, do we have a right to do something of that nature? The answer, is both yes and no. The situation is very circumstantial, and depends greatly on the purpose of this rewrite and how much it differs from the original text. Unfortunately, many people do not understand this, and choose to …show more content…
Today, it is widely believed that Paul Revere completed the midnight ride alone, and is accepted as the truth by many people, the entertainment industry (such as video games or movies), and even some historians and history book authors. Now a days, it is often thought that Paul Revere was acting alone during his midnight ride, and that it is actually possible to achieve such a ride within the same time frame as stated in the poem without killing the horse or meeting opposition. Such a feat is impossible, and it is shocking that it was accepted by many when it was first published, though during that time almost everybody used horses as a means of …show more content…
If they are meant for the young, to make the text easier to understand, or if the author simply says that the text is not historically accurate, then indeed we do possess the right to do such things. However, assuming that the text does not meet these requirements, then the author is lying to those who choose to read it. He is also dishonoring the memory of the people present in the story (assuming they are deceased) by either taking the collective glory of multiple people and pushing it solely onto one person, or by making a person do some heroic act that never happened. Finally, the longer a lie circulates, the more people see it as the truth. Many people believe that Revere completed the ride alone in a matter of a couple of hours, when in fact that is impossible. They go without knowing the true history of the most important night in United States history, and it truly is a shame. Therefore, under proper circumstances, there is nothing wrong with rewriting history, though by disregarding these circumstances, you are lying, damaging someone’s honor and reputation, and risking the lie becoming
Do you know who Paul Revere is?“Listen my children,and you shall hear of the midnight ride of Paul Revere. ”Paul Revere was involved in the Revolutionary War in 1775 and wanted to be free from the British. The Paul Revere’s Ride Poem was very inaccurate and the historical one was acute. According to Paul Revere Ride Poem there are three different characters.
While many people claim that Paul Revere was alone in this journey, many others disagree with this statement, and think that he was indeed with other people. The articles, “Paul Revere: A Colonial Hero,” and “The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere,” claim that he was by himself, while, “Revere’s Famous Ride,” claims that he was acquainted by others. First and foremost, “Paul Revere: A Colonial Hero,” and “The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere,” state that Revere was alone because he was most credited for it, and his name is the more well known. In the article, “Paul Revere: A Colonial Hero,” it states, “For more than two centuries, Paul Revere has
Overall, the authors make a correct point, because it is easy to fabricate a story, but it’s harder to hide the factual information. The people who care enough to delve into the factual books will gain the benefits of it. I agree with Katz and Vishny that those factual books need to be put in the education system, because they serve a vital purpose to the students. History cannot be taught correctly when everything isn’t shared from the
Sugar coating, lies, and creating false heroism could lead to careless consequences. Loewen starts right off the bat with how Columbus was “portrayed as America’s first great hero”, when he was in fact an immoral and crooked person. He states that textbooks often leave out the crucial details about Christopher Columbus, but the books don't just lie about Columbus. American textbooks are no doubt biased to the whites. White people are often categorized as the “important” ones, while the rest are
It would have been difficult to understand what the colonies and the British were going through during the revolution. I understand why people, such as, John Dickinson were conflicted when it came to American independence. To add to your reasons why Dickinson felt the way he did towards American independence, Dickinson felt the best thing for the colonies was to form an alliance with Great Britain. He felt one day “provinces would rise up against provinces and cities against cities,” to fight a common enemy, which would result the colonies to resort back to Britain, even though we once rejected them. In addition, he felt that separating us would give us dependence and not independence.
They may say it is misleading and portrays false material. Rand went too far on exaggerating the plots, used an awful genre, and misadvertised individualism. The novel was hard to keep up with. The end plot compared with the beginning plot made no connection to each other whatsoever. To go from using “we” and “us” to only using “I” and “my” is separating to the characters and the readers.
Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims book report Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims is a book about a time traveling history teacher going on an adventure during the time of the pilgrim’s journey to America and settlement. With the help of his time traveling horse Liberty, Rush Revere experiences firsthand what it was like to travel with the pilgrim’s to the new world, along with two of his students, Tommy and Freedom. They see how much faith the pilgrim’s had in God, and how they were willing to travel to a new land not knowing if they would make it or not just because they wanted religious freedom. They experienced the making and signing of the Mayflower Compact and The building of Plymouth Colony. They got to meet and befriend famous historical figures such as William Bradford, Myles Standish, Samoset, and Squanto, and were invited to the pilgrim’s first Thanksgiving.
The Duel between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr and Washington’s Farewell Address were integral events in the founding of America. One event brought about the end of an influential Founding Father’s life and the others career, and the other announced the end of the Father’s career. The “end” of these three men impacted how historians, students, and Americans view them today. Hamilton dies as a martyr, Burr lives as a traitor, Washington retires as a figurehead.
Ride is valid for three reasons. The date when his night ride occurred is similar in the poem and in the letter Paul wrote. The river they crossed is identical, and the warning signal they used is consistent in both the poem and the letter. On the other hand, some may claim that the Poem, Paul Revere’s Ride is not valid.
“Myth vs. Fact” Writing “Paul Revere’s Ride” by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. That poem has played a big role in American patriotism. What most people don’t know is a lot of the “facts” about that glorious night are actually myths. Most people think Paul Revere was a lone action hero. Actually, he was not. William Dawes also rode because, if only one person rode there was a big chance of them getting captured.
The text talks about the story of Revere’s ride and his journey. The poem is the first piece of text that we have to learn about Paul Revere's ride. On April 18, 1775, Paul Revere left on his now famous ride. The goal of this ride, was to warn people, that the British were preparing to attack the Middlesex villages in Concord and Lexington. Revere started off the ride, by taking a boat to Charlestown, where he then waited with his horse ready to ride.
On March 5th, 1770 an event broke out on King’s Street in Boston that would forever shape the course of history. This event is the Boston Massacre, although the term “massacre” is a misnomer, as only five people died at this historic event. It is due to the many depositions, news articles, and other propaganda forms that were released after this event that this misnomer took hold. Propaganda is defined as “information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.” (Dictionary.com).
One cannot deny that the poem has facts about this famous ride. However, these few facts are not in comparison to the false statements. Paul Revere’s letter, in addition to many others, is a true source of information.
Both John Smith and William Bradford were Englishmen who came to America and helped to found the earliest colonies in New England. They came at different times and for different reasons. Both tell of events during these travels in their written accounts, but these accounts show that the two men, as well as their goals, were drastically different. Captain John Smith, considered to be the first American writer, came to America in the spring of 1607. He had many adventures prior to the voyage to New England, and thought quite highly of himself, as is clear in his writings.
And people chose not to listen to the full story because it is easier to take the shortened version. Bradbury said, “ but you can 't make people listen. They have come round in their own time, wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them. It can 't last.” You can tell people the truth and they will still listen to the lie but when the lie hurts