ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson's Speech On Indian Removal

423 Words2 Pages

In the Andrew Jackson speech to congress on indian removal, It talks about the reasons why they should be removed. Andrew Jackson's main reason why they should be removed is because of westward expansion and how it's the whites turn to develop the land. He also says how it will benefit both people even though it would actually make the Indians life worse. I thought it was interesting how they thought the Indians were the problem on westward expansion. In their eyes they thought whites and Indians couldn't mix. Andrew Jackson saw whites as superior people compared to indians.In the Indian removal act it goes on to state all the ways they will get rid of the Indians and how it will go about. It says in the act that all of the Indian land is now

Show More
Related

  • Case Study: The Indian Removal Act Of 1830

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    In President Jackson’s message to Congress, he wrote of wanting to remove the Indian’s from their land for the purpose of increasing the land of the Whites. He wrote this letter as if he was doing the Native’s a favor in paying for them to move and giving them land to live on. It was as if the Indian’s were given the opportunity of a lifetime, and they should take this opportunity for their own good. President Jackson wrote: Can it be cruel in this Government

    Read More

  • Bill Debates Between President Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bill debates that were proposed by Jackson began later on in February, 1830. Between the House and the Senate, the debate was quite relentless. Many people that went against this bill had many concerns with it, that needed to be discussed. They felt as if they could feel the Native American’s pain as they went through all that trouble. They also felt like they didn’t want to both the Indians during treaty-making.

    Read More

  • Summary Of On Indian Removal By Andrew Jackson

    403 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Andrew Jackson’s message “On Indian Removal,” he used diction to create an uplifting tone. For example, in his first line he chose those words, “It gives me pleasure to announce to congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation.” In addition, he said,”It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community.” Lastly, he wrote, “To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the General Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement.” Jackson chose his words such as: “it gives

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jackson And Indian Removal

    519 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Jackson supported the Indian removal with most of the rest of the nation, which he represented, giving him the opportunity to represent the “average” American citizen in the 1800s. Jackson called for the removal of Indians because he, along with the majority of the nation, wanted the United States population to be all white. “One more step toward making the United States a white man’s country.” He wanted more land for the population of the United States to take over, which happened to be the

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

    599 Words  | 3 Pages

    "It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people." -- Andrew Jackson’s speech about the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in 1830. The Cherokee are a Native American Tribe that live in Oklahoma and North Carolina, and have lived there for decades. In 1830, Andrew Jackson (the president during this time) was mad because the Cherokee Indians had been hurting and scalping people in Georgia. Because of this, Jackson put up the idea of a removal act, a way to get the Cherokee to either move out of Georgia or abide by state law.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s belief in equality, however left out many, including the Native Americans and that was the fly in the ointment so to speak. It is quite easy to see that he could not simply ignore the Indians as he built the great nation. These are the original folks who knew the land well. They were humans and they would continue to multiply. The idea of a reservation would restrict their movement and give some sort of control as the country forged.

    Read More

  • Why Was Andrew Jackson A Good King

    515 Words  | 3 Pages

    First, The indian removal act was to move the indian tribes that were occupying land onto western reservations. The indian tribes tried to go to court to fight against the act using the government. The supreme court agreed with the indians, that they did not have to move, but President Jackson made them move anyway because he believed that the supreme court could not support its ruling. President Jackson went against the Supreme Court so that he could sell the land for more money after the indians were relocated. The evidence in this paragraph was taken from the document “President Jackson and Indian Removal.”

    Read More

  • How Was Andrew Jackson Effective Of The Removal Of Native Americans?

    667 Words  | 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was one of the most proud and aggressive presidents the United States of America had seen so far in it’s young age. A demonstration of such a personality was his enforcement of the Native American Removal Policy. This Policy stated that all Natives be moved west of the Mississippi River, regardless of the Supreme Court’s rulings. This act of removing Native Americans from The United States of America was very beneficial to Americans, but unfortunately, was not helpful to the Native Americans at all. From this policy, Americans would gain more land, end America’s dispute between states and Federation on Indians, and would allow existing states to have a larger population and stronger militia.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain

    601 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Andrew Jackson stated that the the manifest destiny was a right to the citizens of America he created the national thought on whether or not to take the land that rightfully belonged to the indians. Even when he was talking about the manifest destiny, he called the indians uncivilized and savages. That sentence was untrue, The Indian wanted peace not war. One of their strategies were to adopt american

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Indian Removal

    656 Words  | 3 Pages

    As President Andrew Jackson noted in 1832, if no one intended to enforce the Supreme Court’s rulings (which he certainly did not), then the decisions would “[fall]…still born. ”44 Southern states were determined to take ownership of Native lands and would go to great lengths to secure this territory, burning out Natives and squatting on their lands.45 President Andrew Jackson outlined his Indian removal policy in his Second Annual Message to Congress.46 Jackson's comments on Indian removal begin with the words, "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation. Two important tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress, and it is believed that their example will induce the remaining tribes also to seek the same obvious advantages.47 Once gold was found in Georgia, the Native populations of the South had to be removed. The Five Civilized Tribes were to be relocated by the federal government.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

    865 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

    Read More

  • The Diction Used In Andrew Jackson's Speech On The Indian Removal Act

    386 Words  | 2 Pages

    The tone and diction used in Samuel’s Memory, and Andrew Jackson's speech on the Indian removal act share differences and similarities. Analyzing, both sides of the removal act, and how the people reacted differently due to the writer's tone using positive and negative connotations. As well as the diction used in each piece of writing. Jackson uses different tones and diction to persuade readers to believe him. Each piece of writing shares a main purpose.

    Read More

  • How Was Andrew Jackson Venerated Or Ruthless

    1744 Words  | 7 Pages

    Early in Jacksons administration he passed the Indian Removal Act (1830) which gave the government funding to remove the ‘Five Civilised Tribes’ which included the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole Indians – a total of nearly 60,000. The act authorised the relocation of the tribes previously situated to the east of the Mississippi river to the west. The act didn’t allow the forced removal of the tribes but it allowed Jackson to negotiate with the tribes for their land which he did and led to their removal. This was made worse as the tribes unlike the other Indian tribes had done all they could to integrate into American society. For example, the Cherokee tribe created their own written language which set a precedent for Indians, they established education for their children, and even created a constitution which they had to adhere to.

    Read More

More about Andrew Jackson's Speech On Indian Removal

Open Document