ipl-logo

Comparison Of Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

827 Words4 Pages

Point of view or perspective could differ when it comes to describing an event or a person. If we take the case of Andrew Jackson the 7th US president who is often referred to as the “people’s president” there are mixed opinions. I believe he was a president for only some of the people as lots Creeks lost their lives and land for him to succeed. So in a land where the constitution says “all men are created equal,” the Creek Indians must not have been viewed as men such if Mr. Jackson was a man for the people. In 1830 Andrew Jackson formed The Indian Removal Act.( Hall pg 395) The United States Government made it mandatory for Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, Chickasaw and Choctaw to leave their lands in the south, and relocate west of the Mississippi River (Hall pg 395). Many Native-Americans became ill and died. (Hall pg 395) Some died of the immense length of their journey, many of the Natives died from malnutrition as well as a complete lack of food.(Hall pg 395) The Indian Removal stated that all Indians had to walk to the Mississippi River, it did not matter how old you were or young, …show more content…

He was a no holds barred president and he was going to succeed. He was firm strong and tough, a war hero against the British in 1812 and again against the Indians. (Hall pg 395) The Jackson presidency was said to be an age of a more democratic America. This was a president for the ordinary man. Andrew Jackson’s belief in equality, however left out many, including the Native Americans and that was the fly in the ointment so to speak. It is quite easy to see that he could not simply ignore the Indians as he built the great nation. These are the original folks who knew the land well. They were humans and they would continue to multiply. The idea of a reservation would restrict their movement and give some sort of control as the country forged. (Hall pg

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Of Jackson Vs. The Indian Removal Act

    341 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1830 Jackson requested a bill which went before Congress allowing them to move the Indians across the Mississippi. Daniel Webster and Henry Clay both went against the Indian Removal Bill, but its most bitterly outspoken opponent was Davy Crockett. Serving Jackson under the army, he was a Jacksonian Democrat until he and the president separated over the treatment of Indians. In the next Tennessee congressional election, the Democrats gave their support to another candidate, and so he was defeated. Repelled with prejudice, Crockett left for Texas, where he died defending the Alamo within a year.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Be Satisfied To Mark The Face Of A 20 Dollar Bill

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    His views regarding the Indians were distorted by his absolute loathe towards them, creating a toxic environment for the Natives. Due to the constant requests and suggestions to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi River, a dry place seemingly uninhabitable for farm life, Andrew passed the “Indian Removal Act” which remunerated the “Five Civilized Tribes,” the Creek, Chickasaw, Seminole, Cherokee, and Choctaw to abandon their lands and move west of the Mississippi. Although this may sound fair, paying the tribes to migrate someplace else, the lands that they were given was much too unsuitable for the sustainability of crops and the conditions they had to endure during their journey west were absolutely sickening. Some tribes accepted the policy, whereas the Cherokee was defiant against the unethical policies, stating that the policy did not apply to them as they were a separate and independent nation with their own individual laws. Jackson, being the tyrant he is, ignores the Cherokees’ statements and continues to enforce the policy, even though the Supreme Court had already settled on a final ruling.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson And Congress Pass The Indian Removal Act

    234 Words  | 1 Pages

    Andrew Jackson and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The Indian Removal authorized the relocation of Native Americans from the lands East of the Mississippi River and to the west. The plan was finished by moving the Native Americans to what is now Oklahoma. The Indian Removal Act was meant to support the expansion of the United States without interference by moving the Natives out of the way. The Indian removal act was rationalized by the self-serving concept of manifest destiny, the belief that the expansion of the United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean was divinely ordained and inevitable, was used to justify the eviction of Native Americans from their native homelands.

    Read More

  • Case Study: The Indian Removal Act Of 1830

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    In President Jackson’s message to Congress, he wrote of wanting to remove the Indian’s from their land for the purpose of increasing the land of the Whites. He wrote this letter as if he was doing the Native’s a favor in paying for them to move and giving them land to live on. It was as if the Indian’s were given the opportunity of a lifetime, and they should take this opportunity for their own good. President Jackson wrote: Can it be cruel in this Government

    Read More

  • Jackson Indian Removal Analysis

    327 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jackson faced the issue of Indian removal throughout his eight year in office. He made about 70 treaties with Native American tribes both in South and the Northwest. Jackson presidency marked as a new era in Indian-Anglo American relations imitating a policy if Indian removal. His annual message of December of 1829 contained extensive remarks on the present and future state of American Indians in the United States. It contained many observations, assessments, and prejudices about Native Americans that had been widely held by Native American hunters makers since Thomas Jefferson’s presidency.

    Read More

  • Summary Of On Indian Removal By Andrew Jackson

    403 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Andrew Jackson’s message “On Indian Removal,” he used diction to create an uplifting tone. For example, in his first line he chose those words, “It gives me pleasure to announce to congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation.” In addition, he said,”It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community.” Lastly, he wrote, “To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the General Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement.” Jackson chose his words such as: “it gives

    Read More

  • Was Andrew Jackson Justified In The Indian Removal Act

    1296 Words  | 6 Pages

    With more thought and time Andrew Jackson could have come up with a way to integrate natives into society, without removing them entirely. It seems as though America gave up on a people willing to sacrifice their heritage and forget their culture to be a part of this country, and that in itself is a monumental

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

    272 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was elected to be the 7th president of the United States during 1828. Andrew got rid of the Bank of America and forced the migration of Native Americans, otherwise known as Indians. Andrew Jackson was famous for many things one being his military work, but also creating the Indian Removal Act. President Jackson had a tough life, being left with the death of his family at age 14 he had to mature at an early age. After getting a law degree in 1787 afterwards moved to Nashville and became a wealthy landowner.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson American Indian Analysis

    239 Words  | 1 Pages

    President Andrew Jackson’s views regarding American Indians also challenged the law. Treaties were and continue to be legal agreements among sovereign nations. However, Jackson refused to believe that Native American tribes were sovereign and thus viewed Indian treaties as an absurdity. Ultimately, he forcibly removed a number of tribes, most notoriously the Cherokee, from their homes.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act 1800s

    265 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act The Indian Removal Act was signed as a law by President Andrew Jackson in 1830. This law was to remove and settle the Native Americans from East of the Mississippi River to the West, known as Indian Territory. This law also prohibited white people to settle in the nation. Thousands of Indians made attempts which were not violent. Many Indians refused to leave from their lands because they worked for them really hard to just be removed like that.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Justification For Indian Removal Essay

    825 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Justification for Indian Removal The threat of Indians occupying American territory had become a serious issue in the United States. When Thomas Jefferson was serving his term as president, he influenced the United States government by trying to get the Indians to become "civilized." To many Americans, "civilization" meant that the Cherokees had to learn and adapt to their lifestyle.

    Read More

  • What Is Andrew Jackson's Legacy

    589 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was a typical man with a hot head. He was someone many Americans could look up to. Jackson's presidency was the start of a change in the new world. A man outside the norms of what a president was, became the face of the United States.

    Read More

  • Native Americans In The 19th Century Essay

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was passed during Andrew Jackson’s presidency on May 28, 1830. This authorized the president to grant land that was west of the Mississippi River to Indians that agreed to give up their homeland. They believed that the land could be more profitably farmed by non-Indians.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).

    Read More

More about Comparison Of Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

Open Document