A seemingly uncorrelated death of a child becomes an attack on two businesses that brought forth unwanted attention. It reveals how corporations can truly neglect their surroundings and the safety of citizens without remorse. In the quaint town of Woburn, Massachusetts, the death of Anne Anderson’s son due to leukemia quickly transformed from a personal tragedy to an extensive lawsuit. Anne Anderson approached Jan Schlichtmann, a personal injury lawyer, to tackle the case. From the beginning, Anne makes it clear that she does not want money, she simply wants an apology. At first, Jan rejects the case because he does not see money being made from the case. However, after a fateful encounter with a police due to speeding, Jan had the chance to scan the environment which promptly changed his mind …show more content…
Jan acknowledges his situation, “The whole idea of lawsuits is to settle, to compel the other side to settle” [1]. In fact, he uses this reasoning to his advantage by demanding a total of 320 million dollars from both companies. The case is drawn out and both businesses stubbornly refuse to take responsibility, Cheeseman arguing that, “These chemicals never reached Wells G and H - we will show that. And they never made anyone sick. We will show that, too” [1] while Fascher, representing Beatrice Foods, explaining that, “Unless you've proven that poisons reached the wells, there's no case” [1]. Eventually, Skinner decides to ask the jury three questions that will determine the outcome of the trial. It has been ultimately decided that Beatrice Foods is not guilty. On the other hand, Jan is forced to take 8 million dollars from Grace, which barely covers for the expenses Jan and his team had sacrificed for the trial. In the end, it is evident that the money the affected families were reimbursed with was largely due to the differing natures of lawyers and judges that took part in the
Per Reporter: Brianna informed Ms. Mating (9/28/17) that she was scared to go home because Candice would not be home after school. Roy whips Brianna when she doesn’t do well on her vocabulary words. A month ago, Roy hit Brianna with a fly swatter on her leg and butt; the plastic part of the fly swatter fell off while Roy continued to hit her with the medal part. According to Brianna, there was marks or bruising, but there are none currently.
When Katie Johnson first filed her complaint in California, she said she was indigent. She was an impoverished person who needed help in her search for justice. The person she accused of raping her, Donald Trump, was a very wealthy man. He had paid "Hush Money" before to buy a person's silence, about something that embarrassed him. So it makes sense to ask, did Donald Trump offer “Katie Johnson” hush money to disappear and not talk?
In the early 1800s, the Victoria Sponge Cake became an archetypal teatime pastry that was widely popular in England, although recipes have traveled to North America. Ms. Pontellier often meets with her friends during meals, or to have tea in the afternoon or late at night. The solitude in which Edna and her friend, or friends, will drink their tea provides the perfect opportunity for Edna to discuss her feelings towards her own life and the standards of society that she does not agree with. Teatime can occur at any given time during the day, and may refer to many different occasions such as breakfast, lunch, or a time for chatter. Typically in literature, “whenever people eat or drink together, it’s communion” (Foster 8).
Part One, titled “Who Shall Judge Me?” began following the police officer, who was the first to respond, to the scene of the crime. The scene he responds to turns out to be an unequivocally horrific murder of a young housewife and mother in their own home. After addressing the crime scene, Wishman pauses away for the first of numerous times to begin telling the story of the accurate legal steps that correspond to this crime. He depicts how a group of people are first summoned to appear as a juror, which is done by the prosecutor’s office sending out a large amount of prospective juror questionnaires. Everyone who receives a questionnaire must fill it out, or pay a monetary fine.
Juror #3's inability to separate his personal grievances from the case blinds him to the possibility of reasonable doubt and obstructs his capacity to consider alternative viewpoints. It is through intense conflict and introspection that Juror #3 ultimately confronts his prejudice and reevaluates his
People rebel when no justice being served. It is understandable why people act a certain way. Have you ever loved someone more than yourself? A person is your biggest pride and joy to be safe? Can you imagine how it feels to no longer have your pride and joy with in a split second, due to the way they look?
Juror 3 uses his personal beliefs to affect the emotions of the other
The Ashley X case is a very emotional one for anyone who has followed it. After reading through both articles, I have concluded they both are in fact, an inductive reasoning. Ashley’s dignity and what is best for her was the main arguments in both articles. No medical facts stating that keeping her body in a childlike state would be best for her. It’s basically opinion related.
Chris McCandless was in his early 20’s, he was the kind of that guy that wanted to learn and experience life without all of the material things. He wanted to be independent from his parents and friends so Chris did something that would be insane for most of us humans but to him, it wasn’t. He went into the wild of Alaska for months, in fact, McCandless even thought he could make it out alive at the end of his journey. As a matter of fact, he was known as being a risk taker and enjoyed being out and about in the nature side of the world. Many would believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild to purposely kill himself; however, I myself believe that McCandless did not do it purposely.
Enough evidence was given in the book that Hester deserves the punishment. To prove that she does, Hester was raised as a Puritan so she knew what would be the consequences she has committed adultery and is left with a baby alone to raise without a father role model. As well she is not suited to be a mother. She can’t keep Pearl.
Abigail Adams was extremely influential to the nation’s beginnings due to her drive to push certain decisions and debates through the status of her husband. She found the issues of women’s rights and slavery while also finding local politics to be important. As the wife of a president, Abigail Adams was able to use her status in a way to push and bring to life her political agenda. Abigail Adams was able to provide her husband with information and insights of the political situation in Boston during his decade long trip through numerous letters that had been exchanged for so long. Her letters regarding the political situation “included commentary on the American struggle for independence and the political structure of the new republic.”
Juror Nine votes not guilty because he admires Juror Eight for standing alone against the majority. Once the jurors start to discuss the case again Juror Seven questions who else would have the motive to kill this boy’s father. Juror Eight rebuts by saying, “As far as I know, we’re supposed to decide whether or not the boy on trial is guilty. We’re not concerned with anyone else’s motives here” (Rose 240).
The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar
It took just forty five days for United States citizens to acquiesce their rights to freedom and privacy for the sake of safety following the events of September 11, 2001. Forty five days is how long it took the United States Congress to pass a law that gave up the very concept of liberty upon which this country is founded. The morning sky was a brilliant shade of blue with not a cloud in sight in New York on that fateful day of September. That all changed at 8:45 AM when a Boeing 767 jet plane tore into the north tower of the World Trade Center. Eighteen minutes later, a second Boeing 767 bit into the sixtieth floor of the south tower.
Many of the jurors use logos, logic and reasoning, to lay out the evidence in a rational and concrete manner to convince him. An example is when 4th Juror lays out all of the evidence of the knife to convince 8th Juror with seven, linear, factual points. The reader and audience is meant to connect a sense of ethos, reliability or competence, to 8th Juror, as he is the only one who doesn’t, at first, seem to be clouded by ignorance, racism, disinterest, or any other characteristic that might cloud