Before I started this course I had only put minimal thought as to what our rights were in choosing to be vaccinated or not. From what I gathered from being a child and knowing what my nephews are required to have, it was my belief was that vaccinations are a mandated requirement and there was no getting around it. If parents wanted their child to be enrolled in day care, play in little league or just to attend school, it was a requirement to have physicals and for children to be vaccinated. I don’t have any children of my own and because of that I rarely had put any thought as to the number of vaccinations a child must have before the age of four until they reach adulthood. Though not having children does negate my sympathies towards parents’ concerns …show more content…
Even if that meant vaccinating my child against my personal beliefs, mandated or not and without a shadow of doubt, I would have my children vaccinated. For I am unable to comprehend as to why a parent would what to put their own children at risk or for that matter, other children at risk, because of their own personal beliefs. I feel that it is a selfish decision for a parent not to have their child properly vaccinated. After reading this week’s lesson if feel it’s quite clear that people should not have the option to choose to have their children vaccinated. The impact to one’s children and unknowingly to the community is far to great of a risk not to mandate vaccinations for all. This was apparent in our assigned reading of, Tara Hills’ Blog, the Scientific Parent. Her fear and misinformation of vaccinations and ultimately her trust in google created, as what I thought to be a divide between the right thing to do, her pride and loss of control of her family, by choosing to forego the recommend vaccination requirements. But what she
Many people have been brainwashed to think that the only method to keep their children safe and healthy is to get them vaccinated at a hospital. But what they do not know is that most of those dangerous diseases have already been gone for a very long time. And the pharmaceutical companies that are telling them to get their children vaccinated are simply lying to them in order to keep them coming back with the fear that their children will get sick if they do not get their vaccinations. Which leads me to say that parents should have the choice to decide whether or not their children get vaccinations.
In his book, Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All, Paul A. Offit, M.D. presents us with a thoroughly in-depth look behind the veil of the vaccine controversy. Specifically here in the United States. Offit starts us off with the history of vaccinations giving insights into not just their creation but the controversy that has surrounded them since the beginning. We learn how these questions around safety and personal rights started and who have been the major decision makers in history. We hear about the groups and people that support vaccinations and those that do not.
In conclusion, the idea of mandatory vaccination seems to be a better solution so the choice is not given to parents who do not know enough about the matter and the harm they could cause. This program if implemented can keep away all of the diseases that people have worked hard to eliminate. Mill's hypothetical agreement of limiting this liberty is well supported by reason and can be convincing to those who oppose mandatory vaccination, as long as this Liberty of a choice to vaccinate can cause harm to others, it should be taken
I am writing this letter to express my strong feelings about vaccinations. Vaccinations are not something that you should have the option to get or refuse; these vaccinations can be crucial in small children’s lives. Vaccinations help to keep ourselves as well as the people around us safe from communicable diseases. You, your child, and anyone who heads into a public place should be vaccinated to lower the risk of communicable diseases. When your child is born there is a list of vaccinations they are required to receive as well as every few years after that they add more.
The reason this has become a wide debate is due the greatnumber of stake holders that is; parents, doctors, nurses, and the community in general. Mostadvocates say that the decision to vaccinate themselves or their children must ultimatelydepend on them and their judgement. While healthcare officials oppose this on the groundsthat making vaccination mandatory we could protect the children and others from diseasesthat are vaccine preventable. The debate comes down to concept of risk aversion and howrisky vaccines really are. Through my speech I hope to convince you that mandating vaccinesis beneficiary to individuals, the society and the economy.
For example, some parents are reluctant to vaccinate their children against diseases like Hemophilic Influenza if they won’t be attending daycare. While daycares require this vaccine, this deadly disease is a threat to all children, even if they do not attend daycare (Bronfin 3). People who oppose mandatory vaccinations for public school children point out parents concerned with their children being around unvaccinated children could move their child to a private institution requiring immunization (Murphy 2). This reasoning would only add extra stress for families trying to find schools for their children and could cost parents more money than just being able to send their child to a free public school without fear. The next most controversial concern parents have regards the ingredients in some vaccinations.
Analysis Health Restrictions To begin, in this journal Diekema informs families and American educators about the problem’s parents have with vaccinating their kids for school requirements because people believe they have a right to do want they want to their children. This journal focuses on the issue of vaccinations for school requirements. Diekema states “All but two states allow personal belief exemption for legal vaccination school enrollment”. Some parents choose not to inject their kids with diseases.
Hello Bhakhtawar and Neeraj, I have enjoyed reading your posts. Deciding on whether to vaccinate can be a moral issue as well as ethical issue. While ethics are recognized as rules of conduct for a particular group or culture, morals can be dictated by what an individual feels is right or wrong conduct. Our social system (Illinois law) dictates vaccinations for school children unless a parent or child objects for religious reasons or a legitimate medical exemption (ilga.gov, 2013). The law as it exists is meant to protect children using the “Herd Immunity” that if all children are vaccinated then no one will become ill, therefore the purpose is a public health protection.
Some examples are that for the past several years we have heard that polio vaccine lead lymphoma and caused the AIDS epidemic, and the MMR vaccine lead to Crohn’s disease and autism. These theories, however have not bothered themselves with facts, that might be fair in the time of chiropractic’s infancy, but now, in the 20th century it is not acceptable. The lack of true information about vaccination is a struggle to the vaccination policy. A research by Kennedy et al. shows that health professionals consider that girls are empowered to make decisions about the HPV vaccine for themselves, some of them decide not to take the vaccine for the lack of information.
Modern medicine provides people with the ability to protect themselves from the world’s most fatal diseases. Merely a century ago, it was not uncommon for a child to die as a result of diseases such as polio, pertussis, and tuberculosis. Today, it is highly unlikely for a person to contract these diseases, let alone die from them. However, refusal of vaccinations has been increasing throughout the years due to the anti-vaccination movement. This movement declares mandatory vaccines unconstitutional and vaccinations overall as the cause of autism.
According to the U.S. National Library of Medicine, “In some areas, nearly one out of five children have not received their recommended vaccines” (para. 1). The amount of parents choosing not to vaccinate their children is on the rise, and so are outbreaks of diseases that were thought to be gone long ago like the measles and whooping cough. Parents are citing philosophical, religious, and medical reasons to opt out of mandatory vaccinations for their children. The reasoning behind many parents when choosing not to vaccinate their children is usually based on the perceived risk of vaccinations because there are risks when putting chemicals into the human body. The problem that can occur when parents choose not to vaccinate their children is that it impacts others, and when enough parents choose not to vaccinate it causes herd immunization to be down.
Vaccinations When it comes to vaccinations, there are many different opinions on immunizing a child, especially when that child’s parent has a strong like or dislike towards vaccinating. Immunizations have existed for at least a thousand years and as technology advances more, there are new vaccines being designed to help protect our children from contracting contagious and sometimes deadly diseases, such as Bordetella pertussis, polio, and even influenza. For decades, all 50 states have required that parents vaccinate their children against various diseases, including polio and measles, as a prerequisite to enrolling them in public schools (Ciolli, 2008). Enrollment in public school requires up to date vaccinations in order to protect the children and even the adults from contracting and spreading a disease, possibly causing an epidemic.
Comparing health from children who are vaccinated to children who aren't, has an outstanding result realising that the children that weren’t vaccinated are usually up to five times healthier than the vaccinated ones. Teachers, do you honestly want your students being consumed with a disease that could possibly spread to you, all because you believe vaccinations are signified to everyone. Trust me, you would not like it if all that was around you was; fevers, fatigued people, diarrhoea, stuffy noses, and sore throats, can’t you just hear the sounds of sniffing and scratching, “Put an end to it and you won't need to”. Children and beings are not beneficial despite being loaded with bacterial toxins. The manufacturer vaccine inserts offer lists of known reactions – Many which are permanent, life-threatening or worse.
I just wanted to say that I believe everyone should have the opportunity to be vaccinated. Think about it, if they didn’t, there may be a chance of diseases breaking out. Another reason why people should be vaccinated are the fact that people’s lives are at risk. Vaccination keeps people healthy. My final reason is that how easily diseases can spread now.
Whether to vaccinate or not? A question on many new parents mind. Should vaccination be compulsory? Vaccinations should not be compulsory as it is their child however are they putting their child life at risk? To fully understand the many benefits that vaccinations provide to the health of a child the correct description and biological process of how vaccines work must be known.