Censorship In China Essay

1052 Words5 Pages

Censorship in China
Once China entered World Trade Organisation, it was forced to open its markets to foreign companies, granting unprecedented access to the Chinese market. As this happened, the companies operating in China started to demand the advancement of telecommunications, more modern infrastructure and so on. The Chinese government agreed that innovation was required, and began to invest in modernisation, making China one of the world’s largest consumers of telecommunications equipment. However, modernisation leads not only to an increased trade and communication with the world outside of China, but also a great inflow of information into the country from the outside world which in many cases share different political views from that …show more content…

. . security and inspection of public information networks.”
These duties include policing the expression of certain ideas and the attainment of sensitive information. For example, all private subscribers to Chinanet, the main ISP that is administrated by the state telecomm monopoly, were obliged to register with the Public Security Bureau, supply the government with detailed personal information about themselves, and sign a pledge not to “read, copy or disseminate information that threatens state security.” Moreover, all Internet service providers were required to make sure to filter out anything deemed harmful.
Chinese authorities are dedicated to keep up with the development of more advanced information networks by acquiring new …show more content…

It became trusted by millions of users to protect and store their personal information. Nevertheless, in early 2006, Google was requested to stand in front of the Committee on International Relations of the U.S. House of Representatives, defending its actions in China along with Microsoft, Yahoo!, and Cisco Systems. Google’s choice to accept self-censorship, and the discussion and debate generated by this choice, made Google to re-examine itself as a company and the international community to reconsider the repercussions of

Open Document