Compare And Contrast The Most Dangerous Game And General Zaroff
Children may think that their parents are evil for not letting them do something or not letting them go somewhere, but in reality they always have a good reason for saying no. In our world today and in the stories we read, there are people who are more evil than anyone 's parents. In each of the stories “Cask of Amontillado” and “The Most Dangerous Game,” the two characters Montresor and General Zaroff are both very evil and two faced. General Zaroff is more evil of the two men because he does not value human life, he makes his prey feel comfortable while they are staying with him, and he gives his prey no chance for survival.
First of all, General Zaroff is the more evil of the two men, because he does not value the human life. When Rainsford figures out General Zaroff’s “new animal,” he is very shocked. He then replies with “Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff what you speak of is murder” (Connell 25).
…show more content…
He does give his prey weapons to fight with, but they are not strong enough weapons to help them fight back. He informs Rainsford of what weapons his prey gets when he first says “I give him a supply of food and an excellent hunt knife” (Connell 28). This may seem good, but really it is unfair because General Zaroff hunts with a pistol. A gun will most likely win every time, but Rainsford was very smart and knew just what to do because he was also a very skilled hunter. Rainsford also knew where to hide and how to cover up his tracks so it would be harder to find him. He won the game by getting back into General Zaroff’s room by the end of the third night. General Zaroff was very surprised and then said to really win you have to beat me in a fight and whoever wins will get to sleep in the bed tonight. Rainsford was the winner of the fight and this just shows how smart he is and the strength he has to never give up in even the toughest
Compare And Contrast The Most Dangerous Game
394 Words | 2 Pages“The Most Dangerous Game” Contrast paper The most dangerous game by Richard Connell states that there was a guy named General Zaroff who believed in hunting humans. Also there was a man named richard who was a book writer and they both had different opinions. But what the General didn 't know was that rainsford was that was very very smart.and that the book and the movie had two different sides to the story. There is a movie and and a book and the book and the movie are very different. In the movie some people will say that rainsford was dumb founded because when general Zaroff was about to hunt them rainsford
The Most Dangerous Game Rhetorical Analysis
364 Words | 2 PagesMost Dangerous Game Argumentation Paragraph The story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is about Sanger Rainsford ends up on an island with General Zaroff, who hunts humans. Rainsford ends up playing General Zaroff’s game and becomes the huntee while Zaroff is the hunter. Zaroff loses the game and gets killed by Rainsford.
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff
314 Words | 2 PagesGeneral Zaroff was born a Cossack and was known for their savagery. General Zaroff got bored with just hunting animals he wanted some great to kill- humans. Rainsford found out and refused to hunt with him, so General Zaroff decided to hunt Rainsford. Rainsford outsmarted him and had a fight to the death which Rainsford won. But you got to ask yourself.
General Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell
151 Words | 1 PagesAfter when Zaroff had talked to Rainsford about hunting humans he said, “I want to show you my new collection of heads. ”(9). General shows his barbarism when he talks about a collection of heads. It is
Themes In The Scarlet Ibis
600 Words | 3 PagesWhen Rainsford hears Zaroff say this, he realizes that Zaroff is a man hunter. So, Zaroff gave Rainsford a head start into the forest and then he would go hunt him. Rainsford had many challenges ahead of him, the top challenge he wanted to achieve was to stay alive, the next one was to survive in the forest. Day after day Zaroff was getting closer and closer to Rainsford, but Rainsford had a plan, he would build a trap to capture/kill Zaroff. Whenever one of the traps failed, his new challenge was to make a trap and hope that Zaroff would take the bait.
Rainsford Vs Zaroff Essay
616 Words | 3 PagesThe Most Dangerous Game In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff, are similar characters. Both Rainsford and Zaroff share common passions, skills and ideology. Initially, there is admiration between both characters, because Rainsford is Zaroff’s hero and Rainsford is grateful for Zaroff being welcome to him. However.
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff
259 Words | 2 PagesIn the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. Rainsford is a hunter who fell off a boat in the middle of no where. As he gets to land he runs into several obstacle courses, then gets to this big house and meets General Zaroff. General Zaroff also hunts, just not animals. He hunts something more dangerous such as humans who boats crashed like Rainsford.
Most Dangerous Game Movie Comparison
440 Words | 2 PagesAlso, General Zaroff is an extreme hunter and doesn’t find pleasure in hunting regular animals. Zaroff says the most dangerous game is humans because they have the ability to reason. Rainsford is going to be hunted and is given a certain amount of time to survive. Moreover, while Rainsford is being hunted Zaroff
General Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game
588 Words | 3 Pages“The Most Dangerous Game” shows how wealth and power can change people as well as starting the downfall of civilization. General Zaroff, is a wealthy, strong man. What he does with his wealth is unheard of though. Zaroff posits that because he is strong and rich, he can do whatever he wants. The thing he wants to do the most, kill humans.
Sanger Rainsford Character Analysis
624 Words | 3 Pages“‘You have won the game.’ Rainsford did not smile. ‘I am still a beast at bay…’Get ready General Zaroff’” (20) He doesn’t kill Zaroff for any reason other than revenge. By beast at bay Rainsford is saying he doesn’t have anywhere to go, so he wants to fight Zaroff, until someone dies which is ironic because Rainsford states that he is against killing another human being when he first meets Zaroff at the beginning of the story.
Zaroff Persuasion Quotes
287 Words | 2 PagesAnd the answer was, of course, `it must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason… Great Guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder. ’”(Connells 11). Referring to the quote, it exposes how Zaroff tells about the prey and Rainsford got surprised. He even tells Rainsford that he hunts different types of people.
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Analysis
662 Words | 3 PagesFirstly, in the story The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because on the island the only way to live is if the stranded people hunt or the stranded will in contrast become the ones being hunted. In the beginning of the story Rainsford is talking to Whitney about jaguars. Whitney is stating that the jaguars must feel some sort of feeling like fear or terror but in contrast Rainsford states that the jaguars have no understanding of feelings. Then Rainsford is put on a island where he symbolically represents the jaguar and General Zaroff would symbolically represent the hunter.
General Zaroff Murders
299 Words | 2 Pages“Hunting people is not murdering”. This shows General Zaroff 's problem , he hunts humans like animals . Most dangerous game is a short story where General Zaroff sets people up to land on his island , where he keeps them captive and kills them . General zaroff should be prosecuted for hunting humans . He kills innocent people , he sets them up so the people can land on his island and he feeds his victims to his dogs .
General Zaroff In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game
823 Words | 4 PagesThe character General Zaroff, the disturbed antagonist from The Most Dangerous Game, portrays some prominent traits including an arrogance/cockiness, skillful, and insanity. There is evidence
The Most Dangerous Game Theme Essay
653 Words | 3 PagesHunters believe animals are not capable of reasoning and they see them as something lesser than humans. Throughout time, these positions can change. The short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, consists of General Zaroff being the hunter and Rainsford being the hunted. During the story, their positions change to the complete opposite.
More about Compare And Contrast The Most Dangerous Game And General Zaroff
Compare And Contrast The Most Dangerous Game
394 Words | 2 PagesThe Most Dangerous Game Rhetorical Analysis
364 Words | 2 PagesWas Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff
314 Words | 2 PagesGeneral Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell
151 Words | 1 PagesThemes In The Scarlet Ibis
600 Words | 3 PagesRainsford Vs Zaroff Essay
616 Words | 3 PagesWas Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff
259 Words | 2 PagesMost Dangerous Game Movie Comparison
440 Words | 2 PagesGeneral Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game
588 Words | 3 PagesSanger Rainsford Character Analysis
624 Words | 3 PagesZaroff Persuasion Quotes
287 Words | 2 PagesWas Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Analysis
662 Words | 3 PagesGeneral Zaroff Murders
299 Words | 2 PagesGeneral Zaroff In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game
823 Words | 4 PagesThe Most Dangerous Game Theme Essay
653 Words | 3 Pages