John Jardine Professor bishop History 2055 12 May 2023 Question #1 The compromises and decisions on slavery by Congress and the Supreme Court on slavery between 1850 and 1860. Slavey has always been a controversial topic in America. Many different political parties were formed with different ideas on slavery. These parties include but are not limited to the Whig, Free Soil, and Democratic parties. America gained land from the Louisiana Purchase, Mexican American War, and other means. In these territories, states began to form and as they reached requirements for admission into the United States they would apply for admission. As these states attempted to gain admission into the United States the debate of rather, they would be slave …show more content…
One of these policies was the nullification crisis in South Carolina. The nullification crisis started when Andrew Jackson was elected president and southerners thought he was going to lift the tariff of 1828, which raised taxes on European goods and forced southerners to purchase merchandise from northern states at higher prices and caused European countries to have high tariffs. South Carolina acted due to their poor economic state and feat the tariff was a way into the removal of slavery. When Jackson did not lift the tariff, John C. Calhoun, Jackson's vice president write the “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” which stated a nullified state may leave the union. Jackson responded to all of this by first replacing Calhoun after his first term, then stating South Carolina was committing treason and anyone associated with it would be hung, and the military would be sent in to enforce the tariff (Locke, Wright, 2019). One of the long-term effects of this event was the increase in the division between the North and the South. This event became very controversial for Andrew Jackson due to the extreme measures of action taken in response to the crisis, but his response was one of the reasons South Carolina did not …show more content…
Andrew Jackson had a history with the Native Americans from his days in the military, and the first Seminole war. Jackson wanted to remove the Cherokee Nation from land east of the Mississippi, so white settlers could peacefully move into the Cherokee territory. Therefore, the Indian removal act of 1830 was put in place, which allowed the federal government to move the Cherokee to western territory. The Cherokee fought back against the act in both the supreme court cases Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worchester v. Georgia. Although Worchester v. Georgia was successful, the government refused to enforce the ruling, Jackson attempted to remove and create a treaty with the natives but divided them and created conflict between the tribe. In the end, they signed a treaty, but many tribal people still refused to leave, and the Cherokees were pushed out of their homes on the Trail of Tears. Thousands of Cherokees died on the Trail of Tears from disease, weather, and resistance (Locke, Wright, 2019). Jackson's treatment of the Indian nation was a black stain not only on his presidency but in the history of the United States. Although few people were happy with the movement of the Cherokee Nation out to the east so white settlers could move, much of the U.S. was disgusted and enraged by this event. Therefore, Andrew Jackson's treatment of the terrible Cherokee tribe
Some southern people eventually saw the cruelness of slavery and fought against it to the best of their ability. Document I shows a street poster from 1851. This sign advises African Americans to avoid policemen because they are slave catchers. Inferring that any police officers can and will arrest blacks because they may be slaves. In 1850 Senator Clay installed the Compromise of 1850 to avert the crisis between the north and south.
His views regarding the Indians were distorted by his absolute loathe towards them, creating a toxic environment for the Natives. Due to the constant requests and suggestions to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi River, a dry place seemingly uninhabitable for farm life, Andrew passed the “Indian Removal Act” which remunerated the “Five Civilized Tribes,” the Creek, Chickasaw, Seminole, Cherokee, and Choctaw to abandon their lands and move west of the Mississippi. Although this may sound fair, paying the tribes to migrate someplace else, the lands that they were given was much too unsuitable for the sustainability of crops and the conditions they had to endure during their journey west were absolutely sickening. Some tribes accepted the policy, whereas the Cherokee was defiant against the unethical policies, stating that the policy did not apply to them as they were a separate and independent nation with their own individual laws. Jackson, being the tyrant he is, ignores the Cherokees’ statements and continues to enforce the policy, even though the Supreme Court had already settled on a final ruling.
Jackson, infuriated with South Carolina for threatening to break the union, compromised by making the tariff lower. Jackson marked a turning point in American political life because he prevented a break in the union and set an example for Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln used Jackson’s techniques in dealing with secession himself. As Jackson based his attack on democratic grounds, Lincoln based his attack on Democratic grounds as
In 1830, Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act, which gave the federal government the power to exchange Native-held land. As the Indian- removal process continued, the federal government drove the Creeks out from their land for the last time: out of 15,000 Creeks 3,500 of them did not survive in 1836. By 1838, about 2,000 Cherokee Indians had left their Georgia homeland for the Indian Territory. General Winfield Scott and 7,000 of his troops marched the Cherokees more than 1,200 miles to Indian Territory. 5,000 Cherokees died from whooping cough, cholera, typhus, starvation, and
There are complex reasons for the occurrence of such a major event, but not a single factor. In fact, although the negative impact of the general, but the decision for the separation of the southern states did not have an indirect or direct role. However, Dred Scott decision for both sides in this country to bridge the differences that do nothing. On the contrary, it gives one of them a complete victory. Worse than that, it weakened the people's sovereignty theory of compromise and pushed the Republicans to a more extreme position, in fact, to accelerate the pace of the country's civil war.
For example, the three-fifths cause of the Constitution had increased their power in Congress and the electoral college to gain control of the polices of the major parties on slavery. As a result, the Slaver Power consolidated their domination through the purchase of Louisiana and Florida without prohibition of slavery and the passages of the Missouri Compromise that allowed slavery to cross the Mississippi River, the annexation of Texas and the compromise measure of 1850. Observing the dominance of the Slave Power, the Republicans were deeply concerned the fact that Slave Power dominated the government and was using it to extend the peculiar institution and impose a new and alien interpretation of the Constitution on the American people. [3] Furthermore, the Slave Power provided the connection between the Republican view of the south as an alien society and their belief to unify as a political organization to confine the southern influence.
The conflict over slavery became more brutal as the United States expanded westward. It began to force Americans to either identify themselves as anti-slavery or pro-slavery. The discovery of new states led to the conflict on whether they should be admitted as free states or slaves states. Compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 were attempted to settle the conflict of free states or slave states. The Missouri Compromise declared that all new states above the line would be establish as free states, and all states below the line would be establish as slave states.
By the 1800s Westward expansion had been transpiring significantly in the United States with the gaining of new territories through prominent occurrences including the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican-American War. As new states were admitted into the union the imperative issue of slavery expansion arose as the states would have to decide if the new additions would utilize the institution of slavery. The preservation of the balance maintained between the number of slave states and free states was prevalent in constituting resolutions to the slavery issues. The issue of slavery expansion in the western territories repeatedly emerged, provoking conflict between Northerners and Southerners because of the balance of power shared between the northern, free states and the southern, slave states. Both sides feared one would become superior and, therefore, oppress the beliefs and abilities of the other side.
The now president Andrew Jackson, had little sympathy for the Indians and ignored the supreme court’s ruling, he was determined to remove the Cherokee at all coast. In the Removal Act of 1830 Congress provided Jackson the founds he needed to negotiate new treaties and resettle the tribes west of the Mississippi, this migration is known as the Trail of Tears, the Indians “traded” 100 million acres of land east of the Mississippi. (Document
Therefore, the consequence of the war for Mexico was the cession of territories like California, Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in February of 1848. Additionally, the United States acquired the Texan border at Rio Grande and paid Mexico fifteen million dollars for all of the newly acquired land. However, a negative repercussion for the United States was the new congressional debate over which territories would be slave states and which would be ‘free’ states. The Wilmot Proviso severed as a direction for some politicians to oppose slavery but for others to contest its publicized beliefs. New political factions like the Free Soil Party, the Liberty Party and the Conscience Whigs were formed to promote their beliefs that slavery needed to cease for the benefit of the country.
But this time according to the appeal on the Law made in 1830 which prohibited whites from living on Indian territory after March 31, 1831, without a license from that state. So when with the Supreme Court they decided that the Cherokee did not have a right to keep and have their own government in their land, the Georgia extensions of the state's law to be agents the law. From the Indian Removal Act you can see that Andrew Jackson different Values and beliefs than the CHerokees. Andrew Jackson valued American Progress and expansion, because he wanted and continuously was trying to remove the indians out of their land because he believed that they were obstacles to the american progress.
Throughout Jackson’s presidency, he was particularly insistent on the removal of Indians from American territory. Jackson’s Indian Removal Act of 1830 garnered support from both northern and southern regions with economic incentives in mind that prioritized expansion over preservation of Indian homelands. The law established Indians as foreign people who were subject to treaties with the United States. Therefore, the act allowed Jackson to withdraw Indians east of the Mississippi and coerce them westward. The brutality of Jackson’s policy was revealed in his opinions on the possible assimilation of Indians.
This created Sectionalism which meant that Jackson gave special privileges to states or regions that he liked. This stirred up more hate between the North and the
It was difficult to agree on any conflict because Americans were on two completely different sides of the story. When this problem was noticed Henry Clay tried to give peace to the United States, unfortunately, his compromise only worked temporarily. Before the Compromise of 1850, the U.S. had just had a war with Mexico, and the slave controversy was getting more and more out of hand. The Free states, who have high industry income, do not think slavery is right and want it abolished. The Slave states want slaves, because of the amount of agriculture they have; they need people to do the work.