Doctor Faustus is essentially a play by Christopher Marlowe firstly published in 1604, almost eleven years after Marlowe’s demise and at least ten years after the first recital of the play. It is a tale of a man suffering because of his voracious thirst for knowledge and power that led him to his final damnation. It is a play of deep questions which concerns integrity, religious conviction and man’s relation with both the things. This play actually fulfills the craving of the eccentric beliefs in the Elizabethan era. And this play also conveys a sturdy point to its readers that instead of being gluttonous about something one should simply listen to their principles and should then take a right assessment accordingly. Doctor Faustus was a great scholar from Germany. His aim was to gain knowledge. And after being dissatisfied by his study of medicine, law, reason and theology as he did not find any of these up to his expectations. So, at last he turn to the treacherous practice of necromancy or black magic, which he thought would be apt for him as then everything will be at his command. Basically, he wanted to do something that could level him equivalent him to God to which he says: “O what a world of profit and delight, Of power, of honour, of omnipotence, Is promis’d to the studious artisan! All things that move between the quiet poles Shall be at my command.” There were certain rudiments in the play that helped in portraying the tangible quandary faced by Doctor Faustus,
Through his dialogue and actions, Friar Laurence has proven to be benevolent and erudite, but also illogical. He truly cares about Romeo and wants what is best for him, and he uses prior knowledge and life experience to attempt to fulfill this. However, I find Friar Laurence’s ideas illogical and I believe they could harm Romeo rather than help
The field is freshly raked, the sun is blaring in, the game is beginning, but before she is ready, the ball is hit. With the spot light on her, she quickly stumbles over her feet and misses the ball. “Stupid rock” she mumbles under her breath. Her parents protect her with words like “good job” then she proceeds to smile. Ignorance is bliss, for some.
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is widely considered to be one of the greatest literary works of all time. For centuries, it has captivated the audience, enchanting them with the good of the love and the bad of the tragedy. It also features powerful, underlying suggestions of the nature of man. Through Friar Lawrence's belief in doing the best, his inconsiderate decisions, and his plans ruined by things out of his control, Shakespeare suggests that man always thinks he is doing good, but whether he is doing good depends on outside forces and individuals. Friar Lawrence constantly demonstrates his belief in doing the best from his point of view.
The Blame As is the case with many others, Romeo and Juliet fell in love accidentally in the story “Romeo and Juliet,” by William shakespeare. Romeo’s unreal love for Rosaline was soon cleared with the introduction of the capulets daughter, Juliet. As can be known with any tragedy, their love failed. While many reasons remain for this failure, including fate, young age and a no rationality, it will be argued in this essay that Friar Lawrence also played a role in their love’s failure. Without thinking, Romeo and Juliet became victims of their own love chargeable to Friar Lawrence, young age and fate.
Friar Laurence When facing a menacing situation, how does one respond? If the two star-crossed lovers in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet commit suicide by choice, how could someone else be responsible for their deaths? A legendary example is Friar Laurence, a respected holy man who is known as the mentor and trustworthy friend of Romeo. However, this is not who The Friar really is. Although he was completely aware of his actions and could have prevented events that led up to the two deaths, Friar Laurence's negligence and poor decision-making ultimately costs Romeo and Juliet their lives.
Through downward spiraling plots and character developments that depict obsessions prompting madness, the three pieces of literature, Hamlet, Frankenstein, and “Porphyria’s Lover” show how the distraction of obsession ultimately leads to tragedy, delusion, and even death. The character's descent into madness from obsession is shown with the plot and mood of each piece. In each story there are a number of characters who become obsessed with something and then perish. The infamous story Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, offers one of the most supportive examples of obsession in a piece of literature.
In Document 6, a monologue is taken from the play Faust by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, which states, “I’ve studied now Philosophy and Jurisprudence, Medicine, and even, alas! Theology… And now I’m nearly ten years through… and see there’s nothing we can know.” The character in distress has forgotten to be spontaneous and spent his time researching a myriad subjects all to be disappointed by the outcome. The result of the character in Faust is what romantics tried to avoid by escaping to spiritual heights through their art.
While Faustus' practice of black magic and his pact with Mephastophilis condemns him to damnation, until almost the last lines of the play Faustus is conscious of the possibility of salvation if he repents. He is reminded throughout the play that if he truly repents, God will forgive him. It is for this reason that every time Faustus called out to God Mephastophilis is alarmed, because he knows that Faustus could be saved if he only repents and asks for forgiveness. The true conflict of the play is a battle between good and evil, and the prize is Faustus' soul. Faustus himself is represented through the Good and Evil Angles, they represent the two sides of Faustus’s character that are constantly fighting over which way he will turn.
In Act II Scene 2, as Hamlet berates himself for his irresoluteness and cowardice and contemplates vengeance for his father, the concluding soliloquy vividly portrays Hamlet’s transition from irritation to insanity. Shakespeare extensively utilizes analogies and carefully chosen diction and syntax to dramatize the state of uneasiness in Hamlet’s conflicted mind. Shakespeare makes both direct and indirect comparisons and contrasts throughout the soliloquy. For instance, Hamlet’s remarks about the player makes a clear illustration of their subtle similarities and differences to the readers. The imaginary situation in which the player had Hamlet’s “motive and cue for passion” demonstrates that the player, who would be able to “make mad the guilty and appall the free,” is not only keen on, but also subliminally excellent at the art of acting (II.2.520-524).
William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is filled with numerous irresponsible choices that determine the outcome of the play. Some choices barely affect the outcome of the play, while others are for what the play is known. Of these many pivotal choices, many are made by Romeo. Romeo’s personality and belief in fate are the main reasons for the careless decisions.
Frankenstein questions his own morals and purpose, as he realizes, “‘Satan had his companions, fellow devils, to admire and encourage him, but I am solitary and abhorred. '” (pg. 133). After viewing such acts of hatred and prejudice committed against him by the people around him, he reconsiders how he should be behaving, and wonders why there are no others similar to him. He explains, “Increase of knowledge only discovered to me more clearly what a wretched outcast I was.” (pg. 133).
Religious representation in the play brings contrary connotations to symbols of blasphemy, idolatry, zealous obsession and inherent sinfulness that are subtle clues as to the deeper meaning of this relationship and its inevitable fate. The religious symbolism in Romeo and Juliet, rather than exalting their relationship as sacred and condoned, grounding it as fundamentally flawed and marked for failure The metaphor of their
" Or if love be blind, it best agrees with night" ( act 3 scene 2 pg 13 line 9) In the play Romeo and Juliet the author William Shakespeare uses personification. William Shakespear uses a lot of personification in his play theses are the 3 ones that will be covered in this paper: " Some say the lark and loathed toad changed eyes"(pg 31 line 31 William Shakespeare act 3 scene 5), " Or if love be blind, it best agrees with night" ( act 3 scene 2 pg 13 line 9 by William Shakespeare), come gentle night. come loving black-browed night" ( act 3 scene 2 pg 13 line 20 by William Shakespeare )
Marry Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’ or ‘The Modern Prometheus’, largely resembles the Greek myth, where the subject makes severe mistakes, attempting to play god, as he disregards the ethics of humanity, as well as his own moral. Victor Frankenstein, who is the ‘Modern Prometheus’ in Mary Shelley’s novel, attempt to do the impossible – create life! While the Greek Prometheus (a titan), commits three sins against Zeus, one of them being the giving of fire to humans. Both are in their own way absurd, however in both cases, they succeed. However both are subjected to either pain or suffering, whether it is physical or mental, after realizing what they have done.