David Hume's Claim Against Miracles

214 Words1 Page
Hume's claim against miracles is that it does not matter how strong the evidence for a miracle it may be it is rather more rational to reject the miracle than to believe in it. Hume states that there are two ways in order to decide to believe a piece of evidence. The reliability of a witness is the first factor. A witness can be dishonest or be ignorant about a situation which would make their claims worth little. So Humes says to take in consideration how reliable the witness is. The second factor is the probability of what a witness testifies. For example, Sandeep can claim to have seen a miracle. However, it is more than likely that his testimony is false. This also includes our own senses. For example, if I see a miracle it is more than
Open Document