Introduction In the following report, I will be discussing how the manufacturing of synthetic fibres can have an effect on the economy and the environment. The aim of this research topic is to see if the manufacturing of synthetic fibres will create a positive or a negative effect on our environment, our economy, businesses involved to the consumer issues and what fibre are being used. Definition about synthetic fibres and brief history and how synthetic fibres are new invention in the industry and have not been around for many years Different types of synthetic fibres and how they have their advantages and disadvantages which can create a negative effect on the environment through pollution as they are not biodegradable. Advantages …show more content…
Synthetic fibres were produced to fix the flaws or the problems of natural fibres, flaws such as moth resistance, wrinkle resistances and lengthens the wearing period. Rayon and nylon were made around 100 years ago. In 1855 the first patent synthetic fibre was made by dissolving fibrous inners of the bark off of a mulberry tree and by adding chemicals to make cellulose. In 1924 the Celanse company was the first company to manufacture cellulose into rayon and was used in the textile industry, this is remarkable since silk had high prices and rayon mimics al the properties of silk and rayon can be manufactured at a lower price. Different types of synthetic fibres and their properties • Acetate is soft and silky and drapes well, is resistant to mildew, moths and shrinkage and is fast drying but does not absorb moisture, has a poor abrasion resistance. • Acrylic is soft and luxurious, has a high resistance to chemicals and degradation from sunlight, is light weight, strong and drapes well and gives warmth but pills easily. High heat can melt the fabric and is made from a petrochemical called acrylonitrile. • Nylon is made from petroleum, it is durable, strong, resistant to stains, resists mildew and bacteria, prevents static and abrasion resistant and does not absorb moisture which cause the skin to become clammy and makes it uncomfortable to wear next to the skin. It can melt when hot heat is applied …show more content…
Carbon footprint The carbon footprint is seen in two ways, the primary foot print which is what monitors carbon emission directly through energy consumption, e.g. electricity and transport and the secondary footprint which is the indirect carbon emission. Synthetic fibres use a large amount of energy when extracting oil from the ground and the production of polymers. Making a ton of nitrogen fertilizers releases almost 7 tons of carbon dioxide. Effect on the economy Synthetic fibres effect the economy because they are more profitable to produce. They are cheaper, which mean manufacturers producing synthetic fibres will be more competitive and manufacturers who produce natural fibres will not get as many sales and will be affected because people will buy more synthetic fibres. The manufacturing of synthetic fibres provides less jobs which affects the unemployment rate of the country negatively, it provides less jobs because synthetic fibres are manufactured by machines and requires less people to manufacture
The amount of greenhouse gas emitted in the production of tar-sands oil is three times that of conventional oil and gas production. An increase in tar-sands development could increase U.S. green-house gas emissions from 27 to 125 million tons by 2015. The tar-sands fields in Alberta are Canada's largest source of carbon dioxide emissions. Tar-sands oil also creates emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide, which contribute to acid rain
How did the Rise of Factories Change American Family, Social, Economic, and Political Life? After the war of 1812, people began to think manufacturing was a brilliant idea. Manufacturing inside the United States would benefit the economy tremendously. Manufactured goods appealed more to the people than homemade, the price was a lot cheaper.1 (textbook) In 1790 Samuel Slater brought over ideas from England to create the first cotton spinning mill in Pawtucket, Rhode Island2
This example proves to show that the factories were dangerous, not clean, and unhealthy to work in. With more factories coming in at a faster rate, it may help the economy, but it has its negatives. For example, it increases the amount
This led to the increase in material production and made manufacturing easier and cheaper. However, when coal is burned it gives off pollution so an increase in coal usage also impacted the environment.
With every new organization started there are always quite a few questions. I plan to map it out for you. As you may see in Figure 1 the pros outweigh the cons by a huge
Title of experiment: Sequence B: The stepwise synthesis of Nylon-6,6 Oxidation of cyclohexanol: Adipic acid Student’s Name: Nico John McQuiston Lab partner’s name: Christine Sullivan Instructor’s & TA’s name: Dr. Behnoush Memari Date Of Experiment: 9/18/2014 Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to prepare nylon-6,6 utilizing step-growth polymerization.
The release of harmful gases into the air from factories pollutes the world 's air, doing harm to the environment, further leading to global warming. Then, though it did boost many job opportunities, the living condition of the workers during the industrialization were poor. Company towns owned by business were rented out to employees. The owners forced them to live in isolated communities near workshops and forced them to buy goods with high interests. The cities were poorly constructed and crowded with people and residents.
To extract and produce the oil from the sands, carbon is released into the air 17% more than that of conventional oil. The increasing carbon emissions in the air can speed up the changing climate, and can lead to severe health risks. Pollution is a result of extracting this alternative oil, but
How has cotton contributed to the advancement of nations and shaped the world we live in today? Since there is not a single answer to this question, there are multiple factors to consider. In addition to playing a monumental role in the industrial revolution, cotton was responsible for stimulating further technological advancements. Moreover, cotton has made huge impacts in world history, such as leading to the Civil War, expanding poor factory conditions, and even leading to an alternate source of explosives (LeCouteur and Burreson 86). As demand for cotton rose during the industrial revolution, the textile industry was vastly transformed.
Introduction “Cotton is woven into Memphis's history and culture. “ (The Cotton Museum of Memphis). In fact, cotton plantation slaves shouted chants that soon became the blues we all know and love today. Cotton is a plant fiber that is difficult growing, yet could make many fabrics and textiles. Also, thanks to Memphis and it’s cotton there were many more jobs in the city.
“Some immigrants accepted jobs at factories because they had skills that were useful to industry developers and factory owners. Most joined factories because they needed money for food and necessities as they settled into their new lives in America” (Tucker). The addition of Irish labor to the economy impacted the American economy. Many factories were producing items, such as clothing, at a faster rate die to the Irish’s prerequisites. And many farmers were producing their crops faster.
Factories helped produce more goods, in less amounts of time. However, it led to the development of numerous enviromental hazards. The use of factories and mass production casued a depletion of certain resources such as coal and iron. It increased air polution, water pollution, population growth, and disrupted rural villages with the construction of railroads.
Although not much can be done to emission of GHGs from natural sources, but emission through human activities can be evaluated and corrective measures can be suggested so as to minimize them. Carbon footprinting is the measure
In order to explicitly analysis the clothing industry, emphasis must be laid on Textile
Major Facts Herman Miller is an internationally recognized furniture company founded in 1905. The company is deciding if they should continue to use polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in the manufacturing of the arm pads of their chairs. Arm pads are crucial in determining comfort for their customers and make up ten percent of the cost of the chair. Unfortunately, PVC goes against the company’s protocol because of the harmful chemicals it releases during production. Furthermore, Herman Miller international presence represents 15% of its sales and is predicted to be an important area for future growth.