Through this discussion, both sides of politics and science nearly outdid each other in stating facts about IQ and race. Many times the two in this discussion would bring up the suffering of African Americans and how their IQs were at a low. But through the two different debates of Sam Harris and Ezra Klein. They use their styles of speaking to try and educate yet persuade the audience on IQ scores with race. The debate itself was interesting due to both strong characters. They both took the initiative by stating evidence and had their own opinions to back it up. At times snobby comments were being thrown at each other to prove a point. But the two would always go back to the book,” The Bell curve” written by Charles Murray. It was a controversial …show more content…
He first says that he really has a low interest in the race and IQ debate. But later on, says that Klein’ s arguments aren’t really factual and labeling Murray to be a bad person and not really taking much about racism. But then later says that the Bell curve isn’t all about race and IQ, there really is one chapter that goes in depth with it. He even argues that Nature vs. Nurture is not equal and should not be taken seriously. Once, after saying that he proceeds to say that Murray = social policy when Klein is arguing otherwise and that Nature cannot change an IQ. But as well claims that Klein’s evidence says that African Americans are inferior. But instead of really focusing on all the different races we really need to focus on the people who are on the left side of the curve. But towards the end of his argument, he believes that there is intellectual dishonesty and we need to focus on other racial issues apart from the ones we deal with …show more content…
He at first claimed that the way Harris is being treated due to his opinion of,”The Bell Curve” is the same way as Murray and he feels that they both can relate to the same amount of hatred they receive. He also claims which he's a good point that throughout his last podcast Harris never really mentioned race and racism. He also brings up the fact Sam always avoids things like talking about segregation to slavery. But after basing and pointed out some flaws of Harris. He begins to show his side of the argument stating his evidence. Stating that Losing Ground another book Murray created is more towards why whites think they are racist. With “The Bell Curve” it talks about Race and IQ only. Another thing he points out is Murray once said,” European push forward for human characteristics and different race as well have achieved.” Another thing he points out about Sam is that through his ignorance of slavery and segregation he never really had any other race on his show the majority he brings is white. However, towards the end, he explains to everyone that we should treat everyone equally even if one race is inferior to the other. A key point mentioned was that a 12 to 18 point increase in IQ score is met when a child of an adoptive family who lives high needly tend to have that increase. Which is amazing to see, but not surfing because it goes to show you that with money you can have a
However, he did not discuss ramifications. Black expresses more opinions than facts which makes his argument less
Professor Dorothy Roberts discussed her latest book Fatal Invention where she made references to how science, politics, and big business recreate race in the 21st Century. She discussed with Tavis Smiley the different incentives that are used in science, business as well as the Government to categorized race. Despite research that showed that the black race and the white race is only .1% genetically different from each other many are still making an argument that the races are very different and merit ongoing discussions In terms of commercial incentives, Professor Roberts believed that many products are produced based on the assumptions that you can divide the human species into biological groups call race. This was evident in the labeling
In Grant Penrod’s “Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids,” the reader is presented with a piece concerning the attitude of society towards the academically gifted and intellectually advanced. Throughout the piece, Penrod brings forth the general claim that intellectual growth has been forced to take a backseat to the growing mindset that heightened intelligence is now a faux pas. Society as a whole has become less supportive of expanding our knowledge, and has moved from nurturing those who lead a quest for knowledge in favor of hindering them through a slurry of verbal and mental trauma. Within the first paragraph, Penrod exemplified that one high school in Arizona glorified their football team for coming home with the State Championship
Hidden Intellectualism is an article written by Gerald Graff on the school system and how being street smart is better than being book smart. Graff fills most of the article with stories from his childhood and relating the issue back to himself. He starts the article by asserting that “…schools and colleges might be at fault for missing the opportunity to tap into such street smarts and channel them into good academic work.” Immediately Graff blames the school system for not providing a way for street smart students to be academically engaged. Graff goes on to talk about his childhood throughout most of the article and strongly relates his love of sports to how this love could be academically applied in a classroom.
There are certain tools that are essential in schools for the success of education. Whether it be reading, writing, comprehending, or problem solving; these are all tools that are advantageous to possess in one’s education. Unfortunately, not all groups are able to acquire all these tools as easily as other groups are. It is unequivocal that education plays a major role in one’s future, but certain students cannot achieve their ideal education because of the lack of a proper education system. This is what leads to the inequality in education for students of color who are from an underprivileged area, compared to students on the contrary.
He continued to explain that white and black people, in America, come from different backgrounds, they both share the same origins. Therefore, America denying black people rights granted to all humans is immoral. His second claim is that white people separate black people from humanity in
Rush Limbaugh discusses multiculturalism and its possible failings to America culture. Limbaugh believes teaching minorities about their roots hinder their “future as Americans.” He continues to say “If you want to prosper in America, if you want access to opportunity in America, you must be able to assimilate: to become part of the American culture.” This statement, personally, implies other cultures cannot have the same work ethic and values as “regular” Americans, which is a presumptuous statement to make. To a certain point, yes, incoming immigrants and generational immigrants do have to adapt to the American culture, but their roots do not discount their ability to succeed in American society.
He states that book smart can hide inside of people that are street smart, meaning their intellectualism are hiding inside of them. Graff wanted to express his smartness, but was afraid now he is forming
Too many people are receiving degrees while their ideal profession does not involve extraneous education. In the article, “Are Too Many People Going to College?”, Charles Murray uses the maxim of quality and conveys his opinion intending to persuade his vast audience, whom can be inferred as upcoming, or presently, college students along with their parents and educational administrators; such as teachers and guidance counselors. Through the use of a simply structured article with equally understandable syntax and diction, his hidden meaning could not be more obvious of an ideology, however, he is not infallible, he also violates the maxim of quality, assuming his audience knows more than they truly do and at times, flouts the maxim of manner
“Hidden Intellectualism,” by Gerald Graff starts off with an older argument between being book smart and street smart. Throughout the reading, Graff uses his own life experiences to critique the education system today. Points made focus on the idea of overlooking the intellectual potential of those who come across as being, “street smart”. Different authors cited in the reading to show how to accept another’s different intellectual. However, we realize that people who come across as being intellectual weren’t always labeled as that.
This logically explains the rout the United States will take if it keeps on discriminating against African Americans, especially when it comes to education. He challenges his
TED is one of the non-profit organizations that does help to share different ideas of different people to the world through their persuasive talk. Sir Ken Robinson, in his Ted Talk, discusses how systems of public education disregard the creativity as it is an important factor related with the growth of students, academically. Robinson does focus on the creativity by arguing through different examples, which does make audience, and other viewers to think on this issue and take action which is being ignored by public education system. The use of pathos, ethos, and logos while his talk regarding creativity in school makes the case of education system entertaining and understand, by giving proper examples with the use of humorous tone.
Standardized testing has become one of the most popular types of testing in U.S. public schools to date. Students take numerous standardized tests throughout their childhood schooling. (Studies show that a typical student takes an average of 112 mandated standardized tests between Pre-K and 12th grade.) While standardized testing is one of the main procedures that Universities use to judge incoming students, it is not proven to be the most effective way to convey a student’s actual intelligence level. The U.S. should not focus so heavily on standardized testing because it is not a complete accurate measurement of a student’s intelligence.
Henry Wadworth Longfellow, and American poet from the 1800s, said, “Men of genius are often dull and inert in society; as the blazing meteor, when it descends to earth, is only a stone.” This concept I explained by, Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers. He devotes chapters three and four to discussing “The Trouble with Geniuses.” The theory he outlines in this section of the book discusses how much of a factor high intelligent quotient is in determining success, versus how important upbringing is. He examines geniuses, who are commonly considered “the true outliers,” and their successes.
THEORIES OF INTELLIGENCE INTRODUCTION Throughout history, numerous researchers have suggested different definitions regarding intelligence and that it is a single, general ability, while other researchers believed that the definition of intelligence includes a range of skills. Spearman (general intelligence), Gardner (multiple intelligence) and Goleman (emotional intelligence) have all looked into further research regarding intelligence, where 3 different theories were formed regarding what intelligence is and how it should be defined. Since then, Binet, Simon and Terman have all contributed to intelligence testing. Although, there is still controversy over intelligence testing.