Audience: As Dr. Barnetson is a current professor for Athabasca University, the obvious intended audience is students who are taking the relevant course. The size, layout and print style are not specifically geared towards academics, however, and the general feel of this book is more like a well-written narrative, with no charts or graphs and additional blurbs of information scattered throughout. The book would be useful tool for student studying this subject, but also to administrators of workers’ compensation systems, as well as policy writers and key decisions makers within for-profit companies. Thesis: Dr. Barnetson concludes throughout the book that the current workers’ compensation system in Canada falls very short of its goal and intentions. Although it is designed to assist employees who have sustained a workplace injury, the author continuously illustrates how injured workers are worse off after coming through the machine of workers’ compensation. Barnetson concludes that the “moral commitment to worker welfare is clearly absent,” as employers design jobs to maximize profit regardless of the harm to workers. Weak legal regulations also indicate “intentionally prioritizing profitability over safety.” The author …show more content…
Barnetson presents a unique and fresh voice into the space of workplace injury compensation. Instead of beginning with a long list of complaints and critiques, he first provides a historical context on the development of injury compensation and weaves the political drivers into what Canada currently has in place. This allows the reader to come to a conclusion without being coerced or swayed by the author’s own opinion or experience. He then applies relevant, contemporary data and statistics, mixed in with interview snippets and real headlines of today to further demonstrate his point of the shortcomings of the workers’ compensation system. Where necessary, he does use explanation marks and ironic conclusions to drive his arguments
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Summary of the Facts In TurnAround Couriers Inc. v. C.U.P.W. (2012), TurnAround Couriers Inc. is the Applicant, and The Canadian Union of Postal Workers is the Respondent. This case comment refers to a Federal Tribunal’s jurisdictional ability to hear a labour dispute concerning a courier company. TurnAround Couriers Inc. (“TurnAround”) is a Toronto-based “same-day” courier service that was established in 2002 and operated as a for-profit corporation. TurnAround’s primary business transactions included courier delivery by foot, bicycle and subway. Car delivery was also available but was outsourced through a separate company.
The organization highlights problems in the administrative system, assists in developing solutions, and examines impacts of some proposals. CWCI also lobbies through regulatory and legislative testimony. The CWCI estimate that great savings could arise through the adoption of the formulary by California. The WCRI (Worker’s Compensation Research Institute) is a non-profit and independent research organization that provides information regarding public policy issues regarding workers and compensation systems.
Pat Armstrong’s thesis in Managing Care the Canadian Way, is that expanding Canada’s public health care system the way that Canada has been doing so for the last 30 years, rather than privatizing it the way the United States’ health care system runs, is the best way to improve it. Armstrong argues that Canadian health care as a non-profit system is superior to the largely profited and privately administrated services in the United States. Canada has begun to bring American style health care into the system and Armstrong believes that this will have a negative impact on the Canadian health system in cost, accessibility and quality of health care. The strategies used in Canadian Medicare to manage costs are much more effective than managed care in the United States.
Jurgis burns his hand while working at the steel mill, because he is a child, he’s not familiar with all the labor laws. There was a significant gap between laws on the record in corporate America and job enforcement. Technically speaking Jurgis as permitted to receive some help from the corporate company to compensate for his wounds. Unfortunately, Jurgis was not aware that he could complain about his wounds resulting in some sort of payout or compensation. This revolves around power inequalities, the people who are poor and can’t afford an education aren’t well informed about the laws.
The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire was an influential event in American history that caused workers and business owners all of the country to revisit their work-related regulations. Many dangers that occurred as a result of the factory owners’ actions caused the tragedy to be more harmful than necessary. Other preventable mistakes made by the firemen and their equipment added to the tragic nature of this event. America has learned that factories and businesses need safer rules and work environments to protect their employees. Because of this tragic event in the nation’s history, the government passed an abundance of laws to support the safety of workers and their work conditions.
Sinclair exposed the problem of mutilated limbs and other horrors common to the workers. Sinclair also explained how even minor injuries could become fatal and how the labor intense work done at the factories caused workers to experience swollen joints (doc 1). Unfortunately, no laws were passed to protect workers from the awful conditions they faced. Although Sinclair’s attempt at reforming working conditions was fruitless, the public’s reaction to the truth about the meat they were purchasing sparked a nationwide attempt to enact consumer protection laws. The meat packing factories were doctoring their products with chemicals so they could profit from rotten meat.
In 1911, one of the most infamous incidents in American industrial history occurred when the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York City burned, killing 145 workers. It is one of the most remembered incidents since the deaths were largely preventable. Most victims died as a result of neglected safety features and locked doors within the factory building. While the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire did result in a new legislation for safety in the work place, it was not the most important result. The most important result was the institution of the process to enforce pre-existing legislation regarding worker safety and protection in the workplace along with the laws that followed.
After a worker accident you r lawyers must address issues in personal injury law, employment law an insurance law. Not all law firms have the knowledge or experience to do this but in El-Paso work injury lawyers have a dedicated focus on work place accident cases. After Ruhmann’s intervention, the court of appeal found that similarly situated to the other injured workers in state seeking compensation as both consists from of workers suffering from on-the-job injuries or disabilities who are in need of indemnity and medical
The work was also dangerous with not much supervising by the government. Workers, on the other hand, had little or even no bargaining power to leave the unsafe conditions. Nowadays, When Americans only pay attention when extreme work strike, levels of abuse are the norm hidden in the factories around the globe. Although the condition seems much improved, consumers don’t know the true fact- “Today, American citizens simply cannot know the working conditions of the factories that make the products they buy.
On this fateful Saturday afternoon, a vicious fire unexpectedly broke out at the factory, sending panic through its towering floors (Pence et al. 408). A total of 146 workers died in the tragedy, shocking the public and shaping the future of labor laws (Burt 190). "And all Who Jumped Died: The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire" by Patricia Pence et al. summarizes the fire, reviews the response of the factory owners, examines the laws that resulted from the fire, and offers three lessons to be learned from the incident (Pence et al 407). "
The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire On March 25, 1911, 123 women and 23 men, died as a result of a fire in a factory they worked in. That day was marked as the deadliest industrial disaster in Manhattan history. In the wake of such a terrible tragedy came the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union (ILGWU). The ILGWU fought for better working conditions for all sweatshop workers. However, the union wouldn’t gain attention until after the owners of the Triangle Waist Company, Max Blanck and Isaac Harris, were indicted on first and second degree manslaughter, but were ultimately found to be not guilty.
The Great Depression of 1929 not only hit America severely but also devastated the Canadian economy where had the USA as a main partner of trading. This high interdependency on America brought a huge shock to Canada and her economy was replete of increasing unemployment and poverty. Two governments, here, attempted different approaches to recover the massive aftermath and these can be divided into two phases: Bennett’s government of 1930-5 and King’s of 1935-9. Although they both faced failure from Laissez-Faire, they had made different attempts in terms of unemployment, trade and economy including foreign affairs, and agriculture. Both governments here tried to reduce the unemployment by providing pubic works schemes and relief programmes.
IBP was one company that took advantage of this and decided to lie about the amount of injuries. This resulted in a federal investigation that ended with the company having to pay fines and put a new safety program in place. However, this didn’t prevent the company from deceiving its workers. The book tells us that one worker was lied by a company nurse about his injury and on top of that the he had to return to work. This led to another investigation that proved that many injured employees had to return to work on drastic measures.
They have also helped the UK become one the countries with the lowest accident rates in the world. However it hasn’t completely stopped the amount of workplace accidents. “Over 200 people are killed each year at work in the UK and over 150,000 are injured. Two million people suffer from illnesses that have been caused, or made worse, by their work” (Aldworth, 2010)