Essay On Environmental Injustice

What do you think of when you hear the word racism? Many people would say negative things come to mind when they hear racism and shockingly some would say positive things and the reason why is because people still are racist and racism still live with us today. Racism stands right in front of everyone’s face. Sometimes, for example when people go out some people get treated differently because there skin color is darker than the person standing next to them. They say African Americans live in the ‘’ghetto’’ and white people are the rich people that lives in the big houses or they say Jewish people are wealthy, people should not be judged and classified under “rich people’’ or ‘’broke people’’ because of their race Environmental racism is something

In the early 1960’s, the original state of the American environmental justice movement can be traced back to the emergence of the American Civil Rights movement. Prior to the concerned environmentalism with humanity’s adverse impact upon the environment, but there are arguments that are primarily concerned with the impact of an unhealthy environment that forcefully pushes upon a collective body of life, entailing both human and non-human existence, including in some instances plant life.

Thomas Hill has an interesting perspective when it comes to human being’s relationship with the environment. Hill proposes that human beings should start looking at the problem of environmental destruction from a different view point. Instead of asking questions that pertain to the relativity of the environment to human beings, plants, God, and their intrinsic value, it must be asked what type of person, and their character traits, lead them to want to destroy the environment. More specifically, Thomas Hill raises the question of “What sort of person would destroy the natural environment--or even see its value solely in cost/benefit/terms?" (Hill 2008, pg 211). Hill’s perspective on the environment turns the argument to assess human being’s morals in relation to environmental issues instead of an an argument directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining. In this way, Hill believes that people who are destructive towards the environment are missing key traits in their moral virtue. Hill does not believe that it is enough to persuade human beings that their actions are wrong in themselves. He has a strong belief that human beings who cannot see the impact that their decisions have on the environment cannot truly see what good other people hold. In this he describes how human beings who support the destruction of the environment cannot posses the traits of true human virtue. To dive in deeper, Hill wonders if someone, “one who had a broad and deep understanding of his place in nature really be indifferent to the destruction of the natural environment?” (Hill 2008, pg 217). Hill argues that human beings need to understand that they are merely specks in the entire universe’s history. If they cannot do this, they will not have

Freedom of Speech, the right to vote, and the right to equality in public places. These are all basic rights that everyone in this world should have. All over the world, including in Australia discrimination of these rights occurred for the native people of the land. This happened because of their race and skin colour.

For the last 170 years, maybe longer, there has been a recurring displacement of local inhabitants from their native land or community. Motives ranging from greed in relations to an expansion of land and wealth or just wanting a change in “scenery”. While such actions can indeed have a positive outcome on the person doing the action it may not work out for the people it's happening to. Such examples are The Trail of Tears & the modern day Gentrification of the Chicago South Side. The Trail of Tears was the forced relocation of thousands of Native Americans from their native land in Southeastern U.S to the Mississippi River. While gentrification is the removal of lower income minorities from a deteriorated urban neighborhood in hopes to “revive

Unlike humans trying to reconnect back to nature, we rather seem to want to create an artificial nature in our cage of industrious lives. Regrettably, this author 's call to save the environment has not been fully applied, as of today humans are still releasing toxins into the environment at the highest rate in history, occupying forests with building in the name of owning something, in places such as Antarctica, the polar bears are starving, even worst humans had it illegal to feed them while they are exploding and destroying their homes, the seas-fishes are iced up, just to name a few reasons why connecting back to nature is critical. Although green activists such as Ecosia have been working on restoring the environment, however, more needs to be done. We must see to it that nature bounces back to its full

The purpose of environmental justice is fair treatment for everyone. Everyone should have respect to environmental practice and regulations, regardless of the their nationality, income, religion, and ethnicity. “The environmental justice movement has the idea that poor people are more exposed to a greater pollution, hazards, and environmental degradation than richer people.” (Withgott & Laposata, 2012). For example, during 1989 Exxon Valdez, a disaster struck causing an oil tanker with 38-million gallons of oil to wreck at Prince William Sound’s Bligh Reef offshore of Alaska. The disaster caused much damage such as wiping out ocean life as result Exxon paid billions in fines for the crisis.

Environmental racism is placement of low-income or minority communities in proximity of environmentally hazardous or degraded environments. the environment people live In can affect the way they live. people have died, some people have gone to jail over this issue government white people. there are a lot of toxic and polluted in the poor country or states. environmental racism is something that is bad for the community. To begin with, the environment that people live in are different from other environments. The reason why because they are polluted with chemicals and other things. For Example, ''Separate residential limits or districts for white and Negro residents. This shows that U.S minorities have been placed in a separate area for a long time, as noted in the article. In Addition , ''Government needs what no one wants, maybe a landfill or incinerator''. This shows that the government is building a system with the things people don’t want. To continue, the reason why this happens to black and the Hispanic community because the government don’t care who they hurt as long as they getting money. For Example, ''Garbage transfer station nobody wanted...........near the predominantly black Harlem neighborhood''. This shows that things like garbage dumps and toxic waste sites tend to be located in black and Hispanic area Clewiston. In Addition,'' Furthermore, the environment is bad for the community because people don’t know how to treat it. Many places or area in the U.S has toxins in it. Mostly in the black and Hispanic community. For example, '' By the 1952, no African-American lived in any Richmond's permanent low-rent housing''. People were living where it was cheap, the community was bad, but that was what they

Abram believes environmental ethics is about becoming one with the earth through learning more about it and implementing that knowledge through volunteering or a career. This relates to Singer because Abram is telling the reader to educate themselves not just about the earth or plants, but about animals as well. By better understanding animals and how they behave we can better consider their interests and therefore value their lives more. This will also help improve animals’ quality of life because as we improve the earth we will also be restoring habitats and become more considerate of animals. Abram also discusses how reducing our use of technology can help us renew our bond with the earth which can lead to an end to things like deforestation and poaching. By reducing our use of technology we will be more aware of how our actions affect other species and we can tailor our actions to benefit them rather than harm them. Singer’s statement of every species being considered equally can also extend to plants. While they do not experience suffering, they can be considered our equals to an extent. They are living organisms and do require certain things, like water and sunlight, to be kept alive. This means that we should treat plants with a certain amount of respect such as not cutting them all down or destroying environments for our benefit because plants are living and do benefit us in ways such as keeping animals alive and providing the world with

Environmental laws--do we actually know a lot about them? Many people fear for our environment’s future, while others are not aware that environmental issues are occurring around them. Even though we may have some knowledge about this devastation occurring in our communities, should we be questioning the Environmental Protection Agency and the president on these matters when we are not highly educated on them ourselves? Although the articles “Environmentalism Was Once a Social-Justice Movement” and “The EPA’s Failure to Protect People From the Environment” target different people about environmental issues and use the word “justice” at different frequencies, they both express that environmental laws are unjust and based upon race.

Environmental ethics refers to the relationship that humans share with the natural world (Buzzle, 2011), it involves people extending ethics to the natural environment through the exercise of self-discipline (Nash, 1989). Herein the essay will give examples of anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism as forms of environmental ethics, criticizing anthropocentrism in contrast with a defence of non- anthropocentrism precedents.

As the result of my experience this semester I can conclude that this experience was a life changing experience. The way I viewed things in the past about the environment has changed. In the past I was not aware of the importance of living a more sustainable life. Also, how protecting our environment is one of the today’s most serious issues. Some of issues and information that I learned throughout this semester was the web life, food web, overpopulation, mutualism & commensalism, climate change, pollution, rainforest & sea destruction, and the extinction of many animals and plants. It was interesting to learn about the cause and prevention of erosion, while doing my EACAP project. I was not aware of the importance of preventing erosion from the trail. I have many take away this semester not only I have learned about current environmental issue, but also the history of it. Now that I know that someday, we can run out of sources I value than more than ever.

Global environment can be defined as the environment about our nature and the surroundings that influence worldwide scale an environment could be a desert or polar land.

Our earth is the most precious gift of the universe. It is the sustenance of ‘nature’ that is the key to the development of the future of mankind. It is the duty and responsibility of each one of us to protect nature. It is here that the understanding of the ‘environment’ comes into the picture. The degradation of our environment is linked with the development process and the ignorance of people about retaining the ecological balance. Indeed, no citizen of the earth can afford to remain aloof from the issue related to the environment. It is therefore, essentially important that the study of the environment becomes an integral part of the education process. Environmental education increases public awareness and knowledge about environmental issues or problems. In doing so, it provides the public with the necessary skills to make informed decisions and take responsible actions.

Therefore, we need to think about tomorrow with respect to every action that we take in the environment and in this case we can say that sustainable development requires slower population growth. With this in mind, we need to be educated through our cultures about the impact we caused to the environment as we continue to reproduce.  The challenge of environmental ethics has led to the attempt to apply traditional ethical theories, including consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, to support contemporary environmental concerns; the preservation of biodiversity as an ethical goal; the broader concerns of some thinkers with wilderness, the built environment and the politics of poverty; the ethics of sustainability and climate change, and some directions for possible future developments of the discipline [ CITATION And15 \l 1033 ]. With this multi-dimensional approach one can see that it is more of a cultural issue to think of it from its origin. We have grown to see our parents have children, build houses, buy cars cultivate farmlands, explore timber and many other aspects. I think that this is the time to ask ourselves the question how good or bad are our actions to the environment? We should not inherit the habits of our forefathers because we are now responsible for the consequences of our action base on consequential ethics which states that it is common for us to determine our moral responsibility by weighing the consequences of our actions. According to consequentialism, correct moral conduct is determined solely by a cost-benefit analysis of an action's consequences. And in this case, if we apply sustainable development and consequential ethics, I am sure that we will protect our environment looking at it as a social